Depositional age and provenance in the San Luis Formation, Sierras Pampeanas, Argentina: Evidence from detrital zircon studies

The San Luis Formation is one of the lithostratigraphic units constituting the early Paleozoic crystalline basement of the Sierras de San Luis, which are part of the Sierras Pampeanas of central Argentina. The low-grade metamorphic overprint of the San Luis Formation makes it a key unit for the modelling of its sedimentary environment, which belongs to a deep-marine environment. This formation crops out in two belts named as Eastern and Western, whose stratigraphic correlation has not been clarified. Five samples from both belts of the San Luis Formation show U-Pb age distributions of detrital zircons with dominant peaks that are characteristic of orogenic systems of the West Gondwanan landmasses. However, detrital zircon age spectra and maximum depositional ages differ substantially in each belt of the San Luis Formation. While the Western belt displays polymodal age patterns with its most prominent age peaks at ∼635 Ma, a second most important population appears at 535–575 Ma with subordinate groups at 720–775 Ma and 1.7–2.2 Ga; the Eastern belt shows an almost unimodal age pattern dominated by an age peak at ∼535 Ma, with very subordinate peaks at ∼620 Ma, ∼780 Ma and ∼1,017 Ma. Regarding the maximum depositional age, two different ages have been recognized in the Western belt, ∼555 Ma at its bottom and ∼530 Ma at its top; whereas in the Eastern belt the maximum depositional age is ∼515 Ma. The age spectra of detrital zircons from the San Luis Formation record the evolution of the nearby Pampean orogen. At an early stage of exhumation, the Pampean orogenic system chiefly liberated recycled sedimentary detritus containing zircons with Neoproterozoic (∼635 Ma), Mesoproterozoic (∼1,000 Ma) and subordinate amounts of Paleoproterozoic (∼2,200 Ma) ages. Upon advanced unroofing and active erosion, the Pampean sequences sourced first-cycle detritus with latest Neoproterozoic to early Cambrian ages (555–525 Ma). A major conclusion is that the San Luis Formation accumulated in at least two stages, filling successive deep-marine basins that were marginal to the Pampean orogen during and after its latest Neoproterozoic to Cambrian development.Fil: Perón Orrillo, Juan Matías. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - San Luis; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Ciencias Físico Matemáticas y Naturales. Departamento de Geología; ArgentinaFil: Ortiz Suarez, Ariel Emilio. Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Ciencias Físico Matemáticas y Naturales. Departamento de Geología; ArgentinaFil: Rivarola, David Luciano. Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Ciencias Físico Matemáticas y Naturales. Departamento de Geología; ArgentinaFil: Otamendi, Juan Enrique. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra, Biodiversidad y Ambiente - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra, Biodiversidad y Ambiente; ArgentinaFil: Morosini, Augusto Francisco. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - San Luis; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Ciencias Físico Matemáticas y Naturales. Departamento de Geología; ArgentinaFil: Romero, Rurik. Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas. Departamento de Geología; ChileFil: Leisen, Mathieu. Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas. Departamento de Geología; ChileFil: Barra, Fernando. Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas. Departamento de Geología; Chil

Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of neuropathic pain: Consensus of a group of latin american experts

These consensus guidelines have been developed by a group of Latin American experts in pain management, to point out patterns and make practical recommendations to guide the diagnosis, identify warning signs (yellow and red flags), and establish comprehensive medical management (pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment) and monitoring plans for patients enduring neuropathic pain. From the viewpoint of pharmacologic management, drugs are classified into groups according to efficacy, availability/accessibility, and safety criteria. Drugs are recommended for use depending on the disease and particular circumstances of each patient, with an approach that favors multimodal treatment while taking into consideration the idiosyncrasies of medical practice in Latin America

Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of neuropathic pain: Consensus of a group of latin american experts

These consensus guidelines have been developed by a group of Latin American experts in pain management, to point out patterns and make practical recommendations to guide the diagnosis, identify warning signs (yellow and red flags), and establish comprehensive medical management (pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment) and monitoring plans for patients enduring neuropathic pain. From the viewpoint of pharmacologic management, drugs are classified into groups according to efficacy, availability/accessibility, and safety criteria. Drugs are recommended for use depending on the disease and particular circumstances of each patient, with an approach that favors multimodal treatment while taking into consideration the idiosyncrasies of medical practice in Latin America