9 research outputs found
Analysis of Traffic Congestion on Lagos/Abeokuta Expressway-Agege Motorway in Lagos Metropolis
Traffic congestion is one of the most persistent problems facing road users and urban planners, across the world and Lagos is not an exception. This study analysed traffic congestion along the Lagos/Abeokuta expressway-Agege motorway in Lagos metropolis. It explored the volume of vehicular traffic (VVT) along the road corridor, conducted a road network analysis, and investigated the causative factors of traffic congestion on the road corridor. Traffic count data of vehicles plying the road between 7 a.m.-8 p.m. was obtained from Lagos Metropolitan Area Transport Authority (LAMATA) to aid the assessment of VVT. Graph theory-based network index was used in determining road connectivity level, and a cross sectional survey of 384 commuters was conducted to obtain information on traffic congestion along the road corridor. Results of the analysis indicated that the VVT is higher at Ikeja (27.4%) than other locations such as (Alimosho 21.5%, Oshodi 16.2%, etc.). Road network analysis showed high connectivity of Lagos/Abeokuta expressway-Agege motorway with gamma, alpha, and beta indexes (0.8, 0.83 & 2.67) respectively, indicating that road connectivity is not a cause of congestion on the corridor. However, the causative factors of traffic congestion include; overdependence on road, shortage of traffic light, insufficient number of traffic warden, and disobeying of traffic laws (p < 0.05). In conclusion, overdependence on road is the major cause of congestion in the metropolis. Thus, there is an urgent need to improve alternative transport modes in the Lagos metropolis. Keywords: traffic congestion, road network analysis, overdependence on roa
Online support: Impact on anxiety in women who experience an abnormal screening mammogram
To determine whether an online support tool can impact anxiety in women experiencing an abnormal mammogram
Recommended from our members
Advanced Breast Imaging Availability by Screening Facility Characteristics
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship between screening mammography facility characteristics and on-site availability of advanced breast imaging services required for supplemental screening and the diagnostic evaluation of abnormal screening findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from all active imaging facilities across six regional registries of the National Cancer Institute-funded Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium offering screening mammography in calendar years 2011-2012 (n = 105). We used generalized estimating equations regression models to identify associations between facility characteristics (eg, academic affiliation, practice type) and availability of on-site advanced breast imaging (eg, ultrasound [US], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) and image-guided biopsy services. RESULTS: Breast MRI was not available at any nonradiology or breast imaging-only facilities. A combination of breast US, breast MRI, and imaging-guided breast biopsy services was available at 76.0% of multispecialty breast centers compared to 22.2% of full diagnostic radiology practices (P = .0047) and 75.0% of facilities with academic affiliations compared to 29.0% of those without academic affiliations (P = .04). Both supplemental screening breast US and screening breast MRI were available at 28.0% of multispecialty breast centers compared to 4.7% of full diagnostic radiology practices (P < .01) and 25.0% of academic facilities compared to 8.5% of nonacademic facilities (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Screening facility characteristics are strongly associated with the availability of on-site advanced breast imaging and image-guided biopsy service. Therefore, the type of imaging facility a woman attends for screening may have important implications on her timely access to supplemental screening and diagnostic breast imaging services
Caveat Medicus: Consequences of Federal Investigations of Marketing Activities of Pharmaceutical Suppliers of Prostate Cancer Drugs
Recommended from our members
Pharmacovigilance and reporting oversight in US FDA fast-track process: bisphosphonates and osteonecrosis of the jaw
More than half of all serious adverse reactions are identified 7 or more years after a drug receives approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In 2002, 9 months after the intravenous bisphosphonate zoledronic acid received regulatory approval for marketing, the FDA received reports of nine patients with cancer, who were treated with zoledronic acid, who unexpectedly developed osteonecrosis of the jaw. During the next 2 years, three oral surgeons described 104 patients with cancer with osteonecrosis of the jaw in the medical literature and identified intravenous bisphosphonate therapy as being common to the care of these patients. In subspecialty medical, radiology, and dental journals, case reports and case series described clinical features of osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with cancer who were treated with bisphosphonates. Manufacturer-sponsored epidemiological studies reported the first estimates of the incidence of this toxic effect, ranging from 0·1% to 1·8%. By contrast, independent epidemiological efforts from clinicians and the International Myeloma Foundation reported incidence estimates between 5% and 10%. Between 2003 and 2005, warnings about the risks of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis were disseminated by national regulatory agencies, the manufacturers of bisphosphonates, and the International Myeloma Foundation. From 2006, independent clinical recommendations for diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of this toxic effect have been disseminated by manufacturers, national regulatory authorities, the International Myeloma Foundation, and medical specialty organisations. Furthermore, independent efforts by pharmaceutical manufacturers, dental and medical professionals, a non-profit organisation (the International Myeloma Foundation), patients, and regulatory authorities has led to the rapid identification and dissemination of safety information for this serious adverse reaction. Better coordination of safety-related pharmacovigilance initiatives is now needed
Online support: Impact on anxiety in women who experience an abnormal screening mammogram
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether an online support tool can impact anxiety in women experiencing an abnormal mammogram. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed an online support system using the Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System (CHESS) designed for women experiencing an abnormal mammogram as a model. Our trial randomized 130 of these women to online support (the intervention group) or to a list of five commonly used Internet sites (the comparison group). Surveys assessed anxiety and breast cancer worry, and patient satisfaction at three important clinical time points: when women were notified of their abnormal mammogram, at the time of diagnostic imaging, and at the time of biopsy (if biopsy was recommended). RESULTS: Study participants in the intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety at the time of biopsy compared to the comparison group (p=0.017). However, there was no significant difference in anxiety between the intervention group and the comparison group at the time of diagnostic work-up. We discontinued assessment of patient satisfaction after finding that many women had substantial difficulty answering the questions that referenced their physician, because they did not understand who their physician was for this process of care. CONCLUSION: The combination of the inability to identify the physician providing care during the mammography work-up and anxiety effects seen only after an interaction with the breast imaging team may indicate that online support only decreases the anxiety of women in concert with direct interpersonal support from the healthcare team