24 research outputs found

    Intracellular Bacterial Infection and Invariant NKT Cells

    Get PDF
    The invariant (i) natural killer (NK)T cells represent a unique subset of T lymphocytes which express the Vα14 chain of the T cell receptor (TCR), that recognizes glycolipid antigens presented by the nonpolymorphic major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-like antigen presentation molecule CD1d, and they participate in protection against some microbial pathogens. Although iNKT cells have originally been regarded as T cells co-expressing NKR-P1B/C (NK1.1: CD 161), they do not seem to consistently express this marker, since NK1.1 surface expression on iNKT cells undergoes dramatic changes following facultative intracellular bacterial infection, which is correlated with functional changes of this cell population. Accumulating evidence suggests that NK1.1 allows recognition of "missing-self", thus controling activation/inhibition of NK1.1-expressing cells. Therefore, it is tempting to suggest that iNKT cells participate in the regulation of host immune responses during facultative intracellular bacterial infection by controlling NK1.1 surface expression. These findings shed light not only on the unique role of iNKT cells in microbial infection, but also provide evidence for new aspects of the NK1.1 as a regulatory molecule on these cells

    Critical role of NK cells rather than V alpha 14(+)NKT cells in lipopolysaccharide-induced lethal shock in mice.

    No full text
    Although macrophages play a central role in the pathogenesis of septic shock, NK1(+) cells have also been implicated. NK1(+) cells comprise two major populations, namely NK cells and V alpha 14(+)NKT cells. To assess the relative contributions of these NK1(+) cells to LPS-induced shock, we compared the susceptibility to LPS-induced shock of beta(2)-microglobulin (beta(2)m)(-/-) mice that are devoid of V alpha 14(+)NKT cells, but not NK cells, with that of wild-type (WT) mice. The results show that beta(2)m(-/-) mice were more susceptible to LPS-induced shock than WT mice. Serum levels of IFN-gamma following LPS challenge were significantly higher in beta(2)m(-/-) mice, and endogenous IFN-gamma neutralization or in vivo depletion of NK1(+) cells rescued beta(2)m(-/-) mice from lethal effects of LPS. Intracellular cytokine staining revealed that NK cells were major IFN-gamma producers. The J alpha 281(-/-) mice that are exclusively devoid of V alpha 14(+)NKT cells were slightly more susceptible to LPS-induced shock than heterozygous littermates. Hence, LPS-induced shock can be induced in the absence of V alpha 14(+)NKT cells and IFN-gamma from NK cells is involved in this mechanism. In WT mice, hierarchic contribution of different cell populations appears likely

    Rapid Development of a Gamma Interferon-Secreting Glycolipid/CD1d-Specific Vα14(+) NK1.1(−) T-Cell Subset after Bacterial Infection

    No full text
    The phenotypic and functional changes of glycolipid presented by CD1d(glycolipid/CD1d) specific Vα14(+) T cells in the liver of mice at early stages of bacterial infection were investigated. After Listeria monocytogenes infection or interleukin-12 (IL-12) treatment, α-galactosylceramide/CD1d tetramer-reactive (α-GalCer/CD1d(+)) T cells coexpressing natural killer (NK) 1.1 marker became undetectable and, concomitantly, cells lacking NK1.1 emerged in both euthymic and thymectomized animals. Depletion of the NK1.1(+) subpopulation prevented the emergence of α-GalCer/CD1d(+) NK1.1(−) T cells. Before infection, NK1.1(+), rather than NK1.1(−), α-GalCer/CD1d(+) T cells coexpressing CD4 were responsible for IL-4 production, whereas gamma interferon (IFN-γ) was produced by cells regardless of NK1.1 or CD4 expression. After infection, IL-4-secreting cells became undetectable among α-GalCer/CD1d(+) T cells, but considerable numbers of IFN-γ-secreting cells were found among NK1.1(−), but not NK1.1(+), cells lacking CD4. Thus, NK1.1 surface expression and functional activities of Vα14(+) T cells underwent dramatic changes at early stages of listeriosis, and these alterations progressed in a thymus-independent manner. In mutant mice lacking all α-GalCer/CD1d(+) T cells listeriosis was ameliorated, suggesting that the subtle contribution of the NK1.1(−) T-cell subset to antibacterial protection is covered by more profound detrimental effects of the NK1.1(+) T-cell subset

    Dissociated expression of natural killer 1.1 and T-cell receptor by invariant natural killer T cells after interleukin-12 receptor and T-cell receptor signalling

    No full text
    Invariant (i) natural killer T (NKT) cells become undetectable after stimulation with α-galactosylceramide (α-GalCer) or interleukin (IL)-12. Although down-modulation of surface T-cell receptor (TCR)/NKR-P1C (NK1.1) expression has been shown convincingly after stimulation with α-GalCer, it is unclear whether this also holds true for IL-12 stimulation. To determine whether failure to detect iNKT cells after IL-12 stimulation is caused by dissociation/internalization of TCR and/or NKR-P1C, or by block of de novo synthesis of these molecules, and to examine the role of IL-12 in the disappearance of iNKT cells after stimulation with α-GalCer, surface (s)/cytoplasmic (c) protein expression, as well as messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of TCR/NKR-P1C by iNKT cells after stimulation with α-GalCer or IL-12, and the influence of IL-12 neutralization on the down-modulation of sTCR/sNKR-P1C expression by iNKT cells after stimulation with α-GalCer were examined. The s/cTCR+s/cNKR-P1C+ iNKT cells became undetectable after in vivo administration of α-GalCer, which was partially prevented by IL-12 neutralization. Whereas s/cNKR-P1C+ iNKT cells became undetectable after in vivo administration of IL-12, s/cTCR+ iNKT cells were only marginally affected. mRNA expression of TCR/NKR-P1C remained unaffected by α-GalCer or IL-12 treatment, despite the down-modulation of cTCR and/or cNKR-P1C protein expression. By contrast, cTCR+cNKR-P1C+ sTCR− sNKR-P1C− iNKT cells and cNKR-P1C+ sNKR-P1C− iNKT cells were detectable after in vitro stimulation with α-GalCer and IL-12, respectively. Our results indicate that TCR and NKR-P1C expression by iNKT cells is differentially regulated by signalling through TCR and IL-12R. They also suggest that IL-12 participates, in part, in the disappearance of iNKT cells after stimulation with α-GalCer by down-modulating not only sNKR-P1C, but also sTCR
    corecore