8 research outputs found

    Quality evaluation of Payam Noor University of Isfahan in the field of student based on Baldrige Excellence Model

    Get PDF
    The objective of the present study was to examine the quality performance of Payame Noor University of Isfahan about student based on Baldrige Excellence Model. Among all students and the students of economy and educational sciences who had been studying in 2012-2013 year, the numbers of 196 people were selected randomly based on stratified sampling and Cochran formula, among which 66 questionnaires were eliminated. As a result, the analysis was performed on 130 (99 females and 31 males) students. The results show that between male and female students, there is a significant difference about performance qualities of university and male students’ opinions are more favorable than females’ in this respect. Also, there is no significant difference between undergraduate and postgraduate students, and opinions are the same in both groups and there is no significant difference between educational sciences and economics students. The results of the Friedman test indicates there is significant differences between three measured components of the questionnaire, information and knowledge component have been located in the first place, satisfaction in the second place and communication component in the third, respectively. Thus, it can be stated that these three factors are effective on evaluating the performance of students, and information and knowledge component influence has an effective role in the evaluating.  

    Quality evaluation of Payam Noor University of Isfahan in the field of student based on Baldrige Excellence Model

    Get PDF
    The objective of the present study was to examine the quality performance of Payame Noor University of Isfahan about student based on Baldrige Excellence Model. Among all students and the students of economy and educational sciences who had been studying in 2012-2013 year, the numbers of 196 people were selected randomly based on stratified sampling and Cochran formula, among which 66 questionnaires were eliminated. As a result, the analysis was performed on 130 (99 females and 31 males) students. The results show that between male and female students, there is a significant difference about performance qualities of university and male students’ opinions are more favorable than females’ in this respect. Also, there is no significant difference between undergraduate and postgraduate students, and opinions are the same in both groups and there is no significant difference between educational sciences and economics students. The results of the Friedman test indicates there is significant differences between three measured components of the questionnaire, information and knowledge component have been located in the first place, satisfaction in the second place and communication component in the third, respectively. Thus, it can be stated that these three factors are effective on evaluating the performance of students, and information and knowledge component influence has an effective role in the evaluating.  

    Quality evaluation of Payam Noor University of Isfahan in the field of student based on Baldrige Excellence Model

    Get PDF
    The objective of the present study was to examine the quality performance of Payame Noor University of Isfahan about student based on Baldrige Excellence Model. Among all students and the students of economy and educational sciences who had been studying in 2012-2013 year, the numbers of 196 people were selected randomly based on stratified sampling and Cochran formula, among which 66 questionnaires were eliminated. As a result, the analysis was performed on 130 (99 females and 31 males) students. The results show that between male and female students, there is a significant difference about performance qualities of university and male students’ opinions are more favorable than females’ in this respect. Also, there is no significant difference between undergraduate and postgraduate students, and opinions are the same in both groups and there is no significant difference between educational sciences and economics students. The results of the Friedman test indicates there is significant differences between three measured components of the questionnaire, information and knowledge component have been located in the first place, satisfaction in the second place and communication component in the third, respectively. Thus, it can be stated that these three factors are effective on evaluating the performance of students, and information and knowledge component influence has an effective role in the evaluating.  

    Determining the relation between using knowledge management and learning organization to perceived competition-creating organizational climate based on the mediation of career achievement motivation

    Get PDF
    The objective of the present study was to determine the relationship of the use of knowledge management and learning organization to perceived competition-Creating organizational climate based on the mediation of career achievement motivation. The study is descriptive correlational research. The population comprised all professors of Islamic Azad University, Mahallat Branch in the academic year 2013-2014. Due to the small size of the population, all members of the population were selected as the sample. The research tools comprised four researcher-made questionnaires: 1.researcher-made questionnaire of components of knowledge management, 2.researcher-made questionnaire of learning organization, 3.researcher-made questionnaire of perceived competition-creating organizational climate, 4. researcher-made questionnaire of career achievement motivation. In general, the findings revealed that knowledge management and learning organization have a significant relation to perceived competition-creating organizational climate. The indirect effect of knowledge acquisition on perceived competition-creating organizational climate (0.034), the indirect effect of knowledge sharing (0.032), the indirect effect of knowledge use (0.030), the indirect effect of individual learning (0.031), the indirect effect of group learning (0.248), and the indirect effect of organizational learning (0.262) are significant at P<0.0000 level. According to the findings, RMSEA=0.059, RMR=0.026, GFI=0.95, AGFI=0.90, P (value) =0.0000, df=92, x2, and indicates the relative fitness of the model used in the study

    Determining the relation between using knowledge management and learning organization to perceived competition-creating organizational climate based on the mediation of career achievement motivation

    Get PDF
    The objective of the present study was to determine the relationship of the use of knowledge management and learning organization to perceived competition-Creating organizational climate based on the mediation of career achievement motivation. The study is descriptive correlational research. The population comprised all professors of Islamic Azad University, Mahallat Branch in the academic year 2013-2014. Due to the small size of the population, all members of the population were selected as the sample. The research tools comprised four researcher-made questionnaires: 1.researcher-made questionnaire of components of knowledge management, 2.researcher-made questionnaire of learning organization, 3.researcher-made questionnaire of perceived competition-creating organizational climate, 4. researcher-made questionnaire of career achievement motivation. In general, the findings revealed that knowledge management and learning organization have a significant relation to perceived competition-creating organizational climate. The indirect effect of knowledge acquisition on perceived competition-creating organizational climate (0.034), the indirect effect of knowledge sharing (0.032), the indirect effect of knowledge use (0.030), the indirect effect of individual learning (0.031), the indirect effect of group learning (0.248), and the indirect effect of organizational learning (0.262) are significant at P<0.0000 level. According to the findings, RMSEA=0.059, RMR=0.026, GFI=0.95, AGFI=0.90, P (value) =0.0000, df=92, x2, and indicates the relative fitness of the model used in the study

    Relationship between organizational justice and perceived organizational agility: Meditating the effect of achievement motivation (A case study on teachers’ viewpoints in Mahallat Azad University)

    Get PDF
    The aim of this research is to determine the relationship between organizational justice and perceived organizational activity based on the mediating effect of job achievement motivation. The method of this research is descriptive-correlational. The population of the investigation included all professors in Mahallat Azad University (121 members) in the educational year of 2012-2013. Due to the small number of the population all of members were selected as sample. The data were collected through the library and survey method. The instrument of the research consisted of three researcher-made questionnaires: (a) Moreman and Niove (2001) organizational justice questionnaire (α=0.91); (b) the researcher-made organizational agility questionnaire (α = 0.89); (c) the researcher-made job achievement motivation questionnaire (α = 0.94). All questionnaires were set and calibrated according to 5-point Likert scale. To determine the content validity of the questionnaire, we consulted the experts. The data were analyzed through Pearson correlation and stepwise multiple regression methods. Generally the results of the research showed that there was a significant relationship between organizational justice in three dimensions (distributing, procedural, interactive) and organizational agility. The results also illustrated that the indirect influence of distributive justice on the enhancement of the perceived organizational agility was 0.019, the indirect influence of procedural justice on the enhancement of perceived organizational agility was 0.02, and the indirect influence of interactive justice on the enhancement of perceived organizational agility was 0.023. The results also showed that according to findings: RMSEA = 0.048, RMR= 0.029, GFI =0.96, AGFI =0.089, P (value) = 0.0072,df =2, =5.62, and illustrating the good fit of the case study

    Relationship between organizational justice and perceived organizational agility: Meditating the effect of achievement motivation (A case study on teachers’ viewpoints in Mahallat Azad University)

    Get PDF
    The aim of this research is to determine the relationship between organizational justice and perceived organizational activity based on the mediating effect of job achievement motivation. The method of this research is descriptive-correlational. The population of the investigation included all professors in Mahallat Azad University (121 members) in the educational year of 2012-2013. Due to the small number of the population all of members were selected as sample. The data were collected through the library and survey method. The instrument of the research consisted of three researcher-made questionnaires: (a) Moreman and Niove (2001) organizational justice questionnaire (α=0.91); (b) the researcher-made organizational agility questionnaire (α = 0.89); (c) the researcher-made job achievement motivation questionnaire (α = 0.94). All questionnaires were set and calibrated according to 5-point Likert scale. To determine the content validity of the questionnaire, we consulted the experts. The data were analyzed through Pearson correlation and stepwise multiple regression methods. Generally the results of the research showed that there was a significant relationship between organizational justice in three dimensions (distributing, procedural, interactive) and organizational agility. The results also illustrated that the indirect influence of distributive justice on the enhancement of the perceived organizational agility was 0.019, the indirect influence of procedural justice on the enhancement of perceived organizational agility was 0.02, and the indirect influence of interactive justice on the enhancement of perceived organizational agility was 0.023. The results also showed that according to findings: RMSEA = 0.048, RMR= 0.029, GFI =0.96, AGFI =0.089, P (value) = 0.0072,df =2, =5.62, and illustrating the good fit of the case study
    corecore