5 research outputs found
20 ps Time Resolution with a Fully-Efficient Monolithic Silicon Pixel Detector without Internal Gain Layer
A second monolithic silicon pixel prototype was produced for the MONOLITH
project. The ASIC contains a matrix of hexagonal pixels with 100 {\mu}m pitch,
readout by a low-noise and very fast SiGe HBT frontend electronics. Wafers with
50 {\mu}m thick epilayer of 350 {\Omega}cm resistivity were used to produce a
fully depleted sensor. Laboratory and testbeam measurements of the analog
channels present in the pixel matrix show that the sensor has a 130 V wide
bias-voltage operation plateau at which the efficiency is 99.8%. Although this
prototype does not include an internal gain layer, the design optimised for
timing of the sensor and the front-end electronics provides a time resolutions
of 20 ps.Comment: 11 pages, 11 figure
Radiation Tolerance of SiGe BiCMOS Monolithic Silicon Pixel Detectors without Internal Gain Layer
A monolithic silicon pixel prototype produced for the MONOLITH ERC Advanced
project was irradiated with 70 MeV protons up to a fluence of 1 x 10^16 1 MeV
n_eq/cm^2. The ASIC contains a matrix of hexagonal pixels with 100 {\mu}m
pitch, readout by low-noise and very fast SiGe HBT frontend electronics. Wafers
with 50 {\mu}m thick epilayer with a resistivity of 350 {\Omega}cm were used to
produce a fully depleted sensor. Laboratory tests conducted with a 90Sr source
show that the detector works satisfactorily after irradiation. The
signal-to-noise ratio is not seen to change up to fluence of 6 x 10^14 n_eq
/cm^2 . The signal time jitter was estimated as the ratio between the voltage
noise and the signal slope at threshold. At -35 {^\circ}C, sensor bias voltage
of 200 V and frontend power consumption of 0.9 W/cm^2, the time jitter of the
most-probable signal amplitude was estimated to be 21 ps for proton fluence up
to 6 x 10 n_eq/cm^2 and 57 ps at 1 x 10^16 n_eq/cm^2 . Increasing the sensor
bias to 250 V and the analog voltage of the preamplifier from 1.8 to 2.0 V
provides a time jitter of 40 ps at 1 x 10^16 n_eq/cm^2.Comment: Submitted to JINS
Reliable metal-graphene contact formation process flows in a CMOS-compatible environment
The possibility of exploiting the enormous potential of graphene for microelectronics and photonics must go through the optimization of the graphene-metal contact. Achieving low contact resistance is essential for the consideration of graphene as a candidate material for electronic and photonic devices. This work has been carried out in an 8′′ wafer pilot-line for the integration of graphene into a CMOS environment. The main focus is to study the impact of the patterning of graphene and passivation on metal-graphene contact resistance. The latter is measured by means of transmission line measurement (TLM) with several contact designs. The presented approaches enable reproducible formation of contact resistivity as low as 660 Ω μm with a sheet resistance of 1.8 kΩ/□ by proper graphene patterning, passivation of the channel and a post-processing treatment such as annealing
Radiation tolerance of SiGe BiCMOS monolithic silicon pixel detectors without internal gain layer
A monolithic silicon pixel prototype produced for theMONOLITH ERC Advanced project was irradiated with 70 MeV protons upto a fluence of 1 × 101 MeV n/cm. The ASIC contains a matrix ofhexagonal pixels with 100 μm pitch, readout by low-noise andvery fast SiGe HBT frontend electronics. Wafers with 50 μmthick epilayer with a resistivity of 350 Ωcm were used toproduce a fully depleted sensor. Laboratory tests conducted with aSr source show that the detector works satisfactorily afterirradiation. The signal-to-noise ratio is not seen to change up tofluence of 6 × 10n/cm. The signaltime jitter was estimated as the ratio between the voltage noise andthe signal slope at threshold. At -35°C, sensor bias voltageof 200 V and frontend power consumption of 0.9 W/cm, the timejitter of the most-probable signal amplitude was estimated to be σSr = 21 ps for proton fluence up to6 × 10n/cm and 57 ps at1 × 10n/cm. Increasing the sensorbias to 250 V and the analog voltage of the preamplifier from 1.8to 2.0 V provides a time jitter of 40 ps at1 × 10n/cm.A monolithic silicon pixel prototype produced for the MONOLITH ERC Advanced project was irradiated with 70 MeV protons up to a fluence of 1 x 10^16 1 MeV n_eq/cm^2. The ASIC contains a matrix of hexagonal pixels with 100 μm pitch, readout by low-noise and very fast SiGe HBT frontend electronics. Wafers with 50 μm thick epilayer with a resistivity of 350 Ωcm were used to produce a fully depleted sensor. Laboratory tests conducted with a 90Sr source show that the detector works satisfactorily after irradiation. The signal-to-noise ratio is not seen to change up to fluence of 6 x 10^14 n_eq /cm^2 . The signal time jitter was estimated as the ratio between the voltage noise and the signal slope at threshold. At -35 {^∘}C, sensor bias voltage of 200 V and frontend power consumption of 0.9 W/cm^2, the time jitter of the most-probable signal amplitude was estimated to be 21 ps for proton fluence up to 6 x 10 n_eq/cm^2 and 57 ps at 1 x 10^16 n_eq/cm^2 . Increasing the sensor bias to 250 V and the analog voltage of the preamplifier from 1.8 to 2.0 V provides a time jitter of 40 ps at 1 x 10^16 n_eq/cm^2
Time resolution of a SiGe BiCMOS monolithic silicon pixel detector without internal gain layer with a femtosecond laser
Abstract
The time resolution of the second monolithic silicon pixel prototype produced for the MONOLITH H2020 ERC Advanced project was studied using a femtosecond laser. The ASIC contains a matrix of hexagonal pixels with 100 μm pitch, readout by low-noise and very fast SiGe HBT frontend electronics. Silicon wafers with 50 μm thick epilayer with a resistivity of 350 Ωcm were used to produce a fully depleted sensor. At the highest frontend power density tested of 2.7 W/cm 2 , the time resolution with the femtosecond laser pulses was found to be 45 ps for signals generated by 1200 electrons, and 3 ps in the case of 11k electrons, which corresponds approximately to 0.4 and 3.5 times the most probable value of the charge generated by a minimum-ionizing particle. The results were compared with testbeam data taken with the same prototype to evaluate the time jitter produced by the fluctuations of the charge collection. </p