Long-Term Results with Surgery Alone and Multimodal Treatments

Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma survival improved recently, thanks to the use of multimodal treatments. Survival with surgery alone is instead still poor in all locally advanced and node-positive patients. Recurrence is still the main cause of death, and it is particularly high within 24 months. In this chapter we will discuss the long-term results with surgery alone and multimodal treatments in EGJ cancer patients and then the characteristics and types of recurrence

Thoracic Aortic Pseudoaneurysm after Esophageal Perforation and Mediastinitis Caused by Accidental Ingestion of a Mutton Bone: A Case Report on Staged Endoscopic and Endovascular Treatments

Background Esophageal perforation involving the thoracic aorta is a rare but potentially life-threatening event. Esophageal wall dehiscence, aortoesophageal fistula, mycotic aneurysms, or mediastinitis may complicate this challenging condition, and a multidisciplinary approach is mandatory. Aggressive endoscopic and medical therapy followed by thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) may be a valuable approach to reduce the mortality rate of this catastrophic event. Case Report A 79-year-old man presented at the emergency department with a 2-day history of worsening dysphagia and fever, suddenly appeared after consuming mutton meat. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and computed tomography (CT) scan at admission showed a bone fragment penetrating the esophagus very close to the thoracic aorta, associated with signs of mild mediastinitis. After endoscopic removal of the bone, an esophageal fistula occurred. A conservative approach by means of endoscopic clipping of the esophageal perforation, nasojejunal tube for enteral nutrition and broad spectrum antibiotic therapy was preferred at this stage. Control chest X-ray with oral water-soluble contrast (Gastrografin) and repeat CT at 10- and 20-day follow-up showed a complete resolution of the esophageal fistula and mediastinitis. On the other hand, an increase of the aortic pseudoaneurysm was noted. This was treated by means of TEVAR. Subsequent clinical evolution was uneventful, and the patient was discharged in optimal clinical conditions with a 4-week course of home antibiotic therapy. The 6-month follow-up was uneventful. Conclusions Foreign body esophageal perforation causing mediastinitis and aortic pseudoaneurysm is a very rare and challenging situation that requires a strict follow-up and an intensive multidisciplinary approach. A staged approach, first by endoscopy followed by endovascular treatment, may be safe and effective in selected patients

Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer: a single center experience

This article is about an emerging issue in esophageal surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) Few data are published in literature and its safety and feasibility is still debated. The focus of our paper is on the feasibility of an ERAS protocol for esophagectomy (including both the Ivor-Lewis and McKeown procedure) in a high volume center comparing to a standard perioperative protocol. We introduced a novelty item on this type of surgery: resume of oral feeding in the first postoperative day. We analyzed the dropout rate for each item and the postoperative morbidity. We studied 39 patients operated in the Upper GI division of Verona University Hospital between January 2013 and August 2014; 22 patients (ERAS group) were studied in a perspective way while 17 patients (standard group) were studied retrospectively. The enhanced recovery protocol included intraoperative fluid management, time of extubation after surgery, intensive care unit discharge, drains and nasogastric tube management, mobilization of the patient, oral food intake. We compared the results between the two groups in term of hospital stay, postoperative morbidity and mortality. We also calculated the percentage completion of the protocol, evaluating patient drop-out rates for each of the items. Patients showed an improvement in the ERAS group in terms of earlier extubation, earlier intensive care unit discharge (p < 0.01), earlier thoracic drain, urinary catheter (p < 0.01) and nasogastric tube removal (p = 0.02), earlier mobilization (p < 0.01), and resume of oral feeding (p < 0.01). Median length of hospital stays in the ERAS group was 9 days while in the standard group was 10 days (p = 0.23). Postoperative morbidity and mortality were comparable between the two groups. This study shows the feasibility and safety of an ERAS protocol for esophageal surgery in a high-volume center. These data strengthen the literature results on this argument calling for larger sample size studies

Management of portal annular pancreas during laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Portal annular pancreas (PAP) is a pancreatic congenital anomaly consisting of pancreatic parenchyma encircling the portal vein and/or the superior mesenteric vein. It has been reported that the risk of developing a post-operative pancreatic fistula is higher following pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with PAP, probably because of the possibility of leaving undrained a portion of pancreatic parenchyma during the reconstructive phase. Few manuscripts have reported a surgical technique of pancreaticoduodenectomy in case of PAP, herein we report the first case of a patient with PAP undergoing laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

The amount of signet ring cells is significantly associated with tumour stage and survival in gastric poorly cohesive tumours

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the amount of signet ring cells (SRCs) affects clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of poorly cohesive (PC) gastric tumours

Current practice on the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy in Italy: the Abdominal Drain in Gastrectomy (ADiGe) survey

Evidence against the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy are increasing and ERAS guidelines suggest the benefit of drain avoidance. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether this practice is still widespread. We conducted a survey among Italian surgeons through the Italian Gastric Cancer Research Group and the Polispecialistic Society of Young Surgeons, aiming to understand the current use of prophylactic drain. A 28-item questionnaire-based survey was developed to analyze the current practice and the individual opinion about the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy. Groups based on age, experience and unit volume were separately analyzed. Response of 104 surgeons from 73 surgical units were collected. A standardized ERAS protocol for gastrectomy was applied by 42% of the respondents. Most of the surgeons, regardless of age, experience, or unit volume, declared to routinely place one or more drain after gastrectomy. Only 2 (1.9%) and 7 surgeons (6.7%) belonging to high volume units, do not routinely place drains after total and subtotal gastrectomy, respectively. More than 60% of the participants remove the drain on postoperative day 4–6 after performing an assessment of the anastomosis integrity. Interestingly, less than half of the surgeons believe that drain is the main tool for leak management, and this percentage further drops among younger surgeons. On the other hand, drain’s role seems to be more defined for duodenal stump leak treatment, with almost 50% of the surgeons recognizing its importance. Routine use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy is still a widespread practice even if younger surgeons are more persuaded that it could not be advantageous

Clinical nutrition in surgical oncology: Young AIOM-AIRO-SICO multidisciplinary national survey on behalf of NutriOnc research group

Malnutrition is a common condition in cancer patients which is usually associated with functional limitations, as well as increased morbidity and mortality. Based on the support of the young sections of Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) and Italian Society of Surgical Oncology (SICO) merged into the NutriOnc Research Group, we performed a multidisciplinary national survey with the aim to define the awareness of nutritional issues among healthcare professionals delivering anticancer care. The questionnaire was organized in four sections, as follows: Knowledge and practices regarding Nutritional Management of cancer patients; Timing of screening and assessment of Nutritional Status; Nutritional Treatment and prescription criteria; Immunonutrition and educational topics. The modules focused on esophagogastric, hepato-bilio-pancreatic and colorectal malignancies. Overall, 215 physicians completed the survey. As regards the management of Nutritional Status of cancer patients, many responders adopted the ERAS program (49.3%), while a consistent number of professionals did not follow a specific validated nutritional care protocol (41.8%), mainly due to lack of educational courses (14.5%) and financial support (15.3%). Nearly all the included institutions had a multidisciplinary team (92%) to finalize the treatment decision-making. Cancer patients routinely underwent nutritional screening according to 57.2% of interviewed physicians. The timing of nutritional assessment was at diagnosis (37.8%), before surgery (25.9%), after surgery (16.7%), before radiochemotherapy (13.5%) and after radiochemotherapy (7%). Most of the responders reported that nutritional status was assessed throughout the duration of cancer treatments (55.6%). An important gap between current delivery and need of nutritional assessment persists. The development of specific and defined care protocols and the adherence to these tools may be the key to improving nutritional support management in clinical practice