Drug treatment in children with focus on off-label drug use

ABSTRACT There is a lack of paediatric documentation concerning efficacy and safety of many drugs, which contribute to drug use outside the terms of the product license (off-label). In the present thesis, four studies (I-IV), using different settings and design to evaluate pharmacological treatment in children, with focus on off-label drug use, is presented. Outpatient records of purchased prescriptions were retrieved to investigate the frequency and characteristics of paediatric off-label prescribing (I). In Stockholm, 1.8 prescribed drugs per child were purchased in the year 2000. Every fifth drug was classified as an off-label prescription. The proportion of off-label prescriptions was highest for topical drugs, due to lack of paediatric information. A survey of all adverse drug reaction reports to the Medical Products Agency concerning paediatric outpatients in the year 2000 was performed, to investigate the frequency of off-label drug prescribing (II). One hundred and twelve paediatric cases, corresponding to 158 adverse reactions were reported. One third of the reports were regarded as serious, and these were more often associated with off-label drug prescribing. Antiasthmatic drugs were most commonly reported. Psychiatric symptoms were the most commonly reported adverse drug reactions. Paediatric questions and answers to a Drug Information Centre in Stockholm were retrieved and analysed regarding off-label drug use and paediatric literature information adding to the labelling of the drug (III). During a 10-year period, 249 paediatric questions were handled. Every third question concerned off-label treatment, often concerning psychotropic drugs. In every other response to off-label questions, additional paediatric documentation concerning the drug was found in the literature. In a prospective, nation-wide, cross-sectional study, paediatric prescriptions and offlabel drug use to children at hospitals in Sweden were analysed (IV). Enrolment of more than 200 hospital departments resulted in data from 2947 paediatric patients, that received altogether11294 prescriptions within two two-day-periods in 2008. Half of all administered prescriptions concerned either off-label drug use or unlicensed or extemporaneously prepared drugs. Paracetamol was the most common drug used both on- and off-label. Absence of paediatric information was the main reason for the large proportion of off-label prescribing of carbohydrates and electrolytes in hospitals. This thesis has demonstrated substantial off-label prescribing to children in both primary and hospital health care. A common reason for this is the lack of paediatric documentation. Children have the same right as adults to well documented and safe drug therapy. Therefore, it is necessary to improve paediatric documentation through harmonization of existing scientific knowledge and clinical experience, improved structure of SPC information, and more appropriate administration forms. Furthermore, the documentation of drug treatment and its outcomes, including the reporting of adverse drug reactions, need to be improved

Does the EU's Paediatric Regulation work for new medicines for children in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden? : A cross-sectional study

Objective The aim of this study was to assess the marketing status of the new paediatric medicinal products listed in the 10-year report as initially authorised between 2007 and 2016, reflecting the product availability in four Nordic countries. Design This is a cross-sectional study. Setting Analysis of the national medicine agency's databases in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. Data source New medicinal products with paediatric indications and new paediatric formulations listed in the Annex of European Medicines Agency's EU Paediatric Regulation 10-year report. Data analysis The products were classified according to national marketing status between January 2019 and March 2019, whether a product was authorised and whether the product was marketed. Main outcome measures The percentages of the new medicinal products with paediatric indications and new paediatric formulations having a valid marketing authorisation and being marketed, both in terms of the sums of all countries and separately for each country. Results Across the four countries, 21%-32% (16/76-24/76) of the new medicinal products were not marketed. Of the new formulations relevant to children, 29%-50% (16/56-28/56) were not marketed, and a significant proportion of these products had never been marketed. Conclusions This study reflects the reality of the implementation of the Paediatric Regulation. The results show that several new paediatric medicines and new formulations are not marketed. This affects the product availability. Similar data from other countries are needed to evaluate the overall European status to find remedies to current situation and increase the availability of the medicines for children. ©Peer reviewe

Off-label drug treatment and related problems in children : A register based investigation

Introduction: There is a lack of pediatric documentation concerning efficacy and safety of many drugs, which may contribute to off-label drug treatment and increase the risk for adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Aims: To; (I) analyse the frequency and characteristics of pediatric off-label prescribing; (II) investigate frequency of off-label drug prescribing in pediatric ADR reports; (III) analyse drug related problems, the extent of off-label drug treatment in pediatric questions to a Drug Information Centre (DIC) and pediatric literature information adding to the labelling of the drug in DIC answers. Methods: Three retrospective register based investigations on drug treatment of children less than 16 years of age were performed. In study I, outpatient records of purchased prescriptions were retrieved and analysed. The analysis was restricted to the drugs that account for 90% of the total use (DU90%). In study II, a nation-wide survey of ADR reports to the Medical Products Agency in relation to prescriptions among suspected drugs in outpatients was performed. In study III, questions and answers (Q&A) to a DIC in Stockholm (1995-2004) were characterised and analysed. Results: In Stockholm 1.8 prescribed drugs per pediatric outpatient were purchased in the year 2000. Every fifth drug was classified as an off-label prescription. The proportion of off-label prescription was highest for topical drugs, followed by psychotropic drugs. In the year 2000, 112 pediatric ADR reports corresponding to 158 ADRs in outpatients were reported. The off-label proportion in ADR reports was more than 40%. One third of the reports was regarded as serious and these were more often associated with off-label drug prescribing. Antiasthmatic drugs were most commonly reported. Psychiatric symptoms were the most commonly reported ADRs. During a 10-year period DIC in Stockholm handled 249 pediatric questions and each question addressed on average 1.5 drugs. The questions mainly concerned drugs licensed in Sweden. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs), drug choice or dosing were the most common drug related problems. Every third question was off-label and among these the most common therapeutic group was psychotropic drugs. In every other response to offlabel questions, pediatric documentation concerning drug efficacy and safety was found. The most common reason for a drug to be classified as off-label was lack of pediatric labelling in the Swedish catalogue of medical products. Conclusion: This thesis has demonstrated substantial off-label prescribing in primary health care. Off-label prescribing were common in pediatric ADR reports from primary care. We also found literature information adding to the labelling of the drug. There is a great need for evidence based pediatric drug information, which can be retrieved from a DIC. A future challenge is to further diffuse this knowledge to pediatric prescribers through Internet, expert committees and medical journal databases

Melatonin Prescription in Children and Adolescents in Relation to Body Weight and Age

The prescription of melatonin to children and adolescents has increased dramatically in Sweden and internationally during the last ten years. In the present study we aimed to evaluate the prescribed melatonin dose in relation to body weight and age in children. The population-based BMI Epidemiology Study Gothenburg cohort has weight available from school health care records, and information on melatonin prescription through linkage with high-quality national registers. We included prescriptions of melatonin to individuals below 18 years of age where a weight measurement not earlier than three months before, or later than six months after the dispensing date, was available (n = 1554). Similar maximum doses were prescribed to individuals with overweight orobesity as to individuals with normal weight, and to individuals below and above 9 years of age. Age and weight only explained a marginal part of the variance in maximum dose, but were inversely associated and explained a substantial part of the variance in maximum dose per kg. As a result, individuals overweight or with obesity, or age above 9 years, received lower maximum dose per kg of body weight, compared with individuals with normal weight or below 9 years of age. Thus, the prescribed melatonin dose to individuals under 18 years of age is not primarily informed by body weight or age, resulting in substantial differences in prescribed dose per kg of body weight across BMI and age distribution

Prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions in Swedish pediatric outpatients.

PurposeTo describe the occurrence of potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in prescribed drugs, dispensed to pediatric outpatients in Sweden.MethodsA cross sectional study was conducted based on data from a national register of prescribed drugs, dispensed at pharmacies, to children 0-17 years old. The study period was January 1 to April 30, 2010. Drug dispensing data was linked to the DDI database SFINX. Prevalence and frequencies of potential interactions were investigated, and drugs commonly involved in interactions were identified. The study focused on clinically relevant potential interactions, class D (should be avoided), and class C (can be handled, e.g. by dose adjustment).ResultsIn the Swedish pediatric population, 0 to 17 years of age, 12% (n = 231 078) of children had at least two dispensed drugs. In this group of patients, 0.14% had potential D-interactions and 1,3% had potential C-interactions. The number of D- and C-interactions that may lead to reduced effects were 181 (52%), and 1224 (32%) respectively. The ten most frequent drugs were involved in 78% and 65% of all potential D-, and C-interactions respectively. Furthermore, 80%, and 58% of the D-, and C-interactions respectively occurred in patients aged 12 to 17.ConclusionsWe identified a limited number of drugs that were represented in the majority of potential interactions. Interactions that can lead to a reduced treatment effect constituted approximately half of D-interactions, and a third of C-interactions. The frequency of potential interactions was higher in older children. The results may contribute to increased prescriber awareness of important potential drug interactions among pediatric outpatients

Evidence-based Anti-seizure Monotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy: a New Approach

ObjectivesTo describe the process and results of the updated Swedish practice guidelines for monotherapy in epilepsy.Materials and MethodsThe Swedish Medical Products Agency led the process together with medical experts. Evidence rating in accordance with the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) template was linked to the Cochrane group's GRADE system. Evidence from recently published trials and meta‐analyses was added. A national expert panel participated in the project and contributed their clinical experience.ResultsIn seizures with focal onset, carbamazepine, lamotrigine, or levetiracetam is recommended for children and adults (ILAE level A‐C for adults/Cochrane level strong for children and adults). Oxcarbazepine is an alternative for children, although its level A evidence, in a single class I trial, could relate to poor phenytoin tolerability. Eslicarbazepine acetate, lacosamide, and zonisamide are alternatives for adults and gabapentin for the elderly (ILAE level A). Carbamazepine is not a first choice for the elderly due to its high potential for interactions. In generalized epilepsy with tonic‐clonic seizures (GTC), lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and sodium valproate are recommended for children and adults (ILAE level C‐D/Cochrane level moderate‐strong) although sodium valproate is contraindicated in girls and women of childbearing age unless special considerations are met. Ethosuximide is the first choice in absence epilepsy without GTC (ILAE level A).ConclusionsLamotrigine and levetiracetam can be used as first choice for focal seizures and generalized epilepsy with GTC, suitable in all age‐groups and for both men and women. Recommendations for GTC seizures have lower evidence than those for focal seizures