8 research outputs found
Evidence of Non-microtubule Spindle Forces in <i>Mesostoma ehrenbergii</i> Spermatocytes.
Chromosomes selectively detach at one pole and quickly move towards the opposite pole when kinetochore microtubules are depolymerized in Mesostoma ehrenbergii spermatocytes.
In a typical cell division chromosomes align at the metaphase plate before anaphase commences. This is not the case in Mesostoma spermatocytes. Throughout prometaphase the three bivalents persistently oscillate towards and away from either pole, at average speeds of 5-6 μm/min., without ever aligning at a metaphase plate. In our experiments nocodazole (NOC) was added to prometaphase spermatocytes to depolymerize the microtubules. Traditional theories state that microtubules are the producers of force in the spindle, either by tubulin depolymerizing at the kinetochore (PacMan) or at the pole (Flux). Accordingly, if microtubules are quickly depolymerized, the chromosomes should arrest at the metaphase plate and not move. However, in 57/59 cells at least one chromosome moved to a pole after NOC treatment, and in 52 of these cells all three bivalents moved to the same pole. Thus the movements are not random to one pole or other. After treatment with NOC chromosome movement followed a consistent pattern. Bivalents stretched out towards both poles, paused, detached at one pole, and then the detached kinetochores quickly moved towards the other pole, reaching initial speeds up to more than 200 μm/min., much greater than anything previously recorded in this cell. As the NOC concentration increased the average speeds increased and the microtubules disappeared faster. As the kinetochores approached the pole they slowed down and eventually stopped. Similar results were obtained with colcemid treatment. Confocal immunofluorescence microscopy confirms that microtubules are not associated with moving chromosomes. Thus these rapid chromosome movements may be due to non-microtubule spindle components such as actin-myosin or the spindle matrix
Precocious cleavage furrows simultaneously move and ingress when kinetochore microtubules are depolymerized in Mesostoma ehrenbergii spermatocytes.
A “precocious” cleavage furrow develops and ingresses during early prometaphase in
Mesostoma ehrenbergii spermatocytes (Forer and Pickett-Heaps, 2010). In response to
chromosome movements which regularly occur during prometaphase, and that alter the
balance of chromosomes in the two half-spindles, the precocious furrow shifts its position
along the cell, moving 2-3 µm towards the half cell with fewer chromosomes (FerraroGideon et al. 2013). This process continues until proper segregation is achieved and the
cell enters anaphase with the cleavage furrow again in the middle of the cell. At anaphase
the furrow recommences ingression. Spindle MTs are implicated in various furrow
positioning models and our experiments studied the responses of the precocious furrows
to the absence of spindle microtubules (MTs). We depolymerized spindle MTs during
prometaphase using various concentrations of nocodazole (NOC) and colcemid. The
expected result is the furrow should regress and chromosomes remain in the midzone of
the cell (Cassimeris et al. 1990). Instead, the furrows commenced ingression and all three
bivalent chromosomes moved to one pole while the univalent chromosomes, that usually
reside at the two poles, either remained at their poles or moved to the opposite pole along
with the bivalents, as described elsewhere (Fegaras and Forer, 2018). The microtubules
were completely depolymerized by the drugs, as indicated by immunofluorescence
staining of treated cells (Fegaras and Forer, 2018), and in the absence of microtubules the
furrows often ingressed (in 33/61 cells) at a rate similar to normal anaphase ingression
(~1 µm/min), while often simultaneously moving toward one pole. Thus, these results
indicate that in the absence of anaphase and of spindle microtubules, cleavage furrows
resume ingression
Recommended from our members
Evidence of Non-microtubule Spindle Forces in Mesostoma ehrenbergii Spermatocytes.
We tested conclusions reached in previous experiments in which Mesostoma spermatocyte chromosomes moved rapidly to a pole in the absence of microtubules: after 10 μM nocodazole (NOC) depolymerized metaphase spindle microtubules, kinetochores from each of the 3 bivalents detached from the same pole and rapidly moved to the other pole, at speeds averaging 37.7 μm/min. with some as high as 100 μm/min. We concluded that these very fast movements were due to non-microtubule forces arising from a spindle matrix. However, since the chromosomes stretch out before detaching, there is tension in the chromosomes from the stretch. Thus the movements of detached kinetochores conceivably might be due to recoil from the tension, though we argued against this possibility (Fegaras and Forer, 2018a). In this article we test whether recoil causes the movements. We cut bivalents into 2 pieces, using a femtosecond laser, before addition of NOC. When 1 bivalent was severed, all kinetochores moved to one pole in 12/15 cells; when 2 bivalents were severed, all kinetochores moved to one pole in 4/6 cells; and when all 3 bivalents were severed all kinetochores moved to one pole in 3/9 cells. The bivalent "halves" moved rapidly, with average speeds of 47 μm/min, velocities that are not significantly different from those in cells without any laser-cut bivalents (p > 0.05). Since kinetochores move at the same speeds whether they are part of bivalents or not, NOC-induced chromosome movements are not due to recoil from tension along the full-length bivalent, strongly supporting the idea that non-microtubule forces move chromosomes in Mesostoma spermatocytes
Recommended from our members
Evidence of Non-microtubule Spindle Forces in Mesostoma ehrenbergii Spermatocytes.
We tested conclusions reached in previous experiments in which Mesostoma spermatocyte chromosomes moved rapidly to a pole in the absence of microtubules: after 10 μM nocodazole (NOC) depolymerized metaphase spindle microtubules, kinetochores from each of the 3 bivalents detached from the same pole and rapidly moved to the other pole, at speeds averaging 37.7 μm/min. with some as high as 100 μm/min. We concluded that these very fast movements were due to non-microtubule forces arising from a spindle matrix. However, since the chromosomes stretch out before detaching, there is tension in the chromosomes from the stretch. Thus the movements of detached kinetochores conceivably might be due to recoil from the tension, though we argued against this possibility (Fegaras and Forer, 2018a). In this article we test whether recoil causes the movements. We cut bivalents into 2 pieces, using a femtosecond laser, before addition of NOC. When 1 bivalent was severed, all kinetochores moved to one pole in 12/15 cells; when 2 bivalents were severed, all kinetochores moved to one pole in 4/6 cells; and when all 3 bivalents were severed all kinetochores moved to one pole in 3/9 cells. The bivalent "halves" moved rapidly, with average speeds of 47 μm/min, velocities that are not significantly different from those in cells without any laser-cut bivalents (p > 0.05). Since kinetochores move at the same speeds whether they are part of bivalents or not, NOC-induced chromosome movements are not due to recoil from tension along the full-length bivalent, strongly supporting the idea that non-microtubule forces move chromosomes in Mesostoma spermatocytes
Elastic ‘tethers’ connect separating anaphase chromosomes in a broad range of animal cells.
We describe the general occurrence in animal cells of elastic components ("tethers") that connect individual chromosomes moving to opposite poles during anaphase. Tethers, originally described in crane-fly spermatocytes, exert force on chromosome arms opposite to the direction the anaphase chromosomes move. We show that they exist in a broad range of animal cells. Thus tethers are previously unrecognised components of general mitotic mechanisms that exert force on chromosomes and they need to be accounted for in general models of mitosis in terms of forces on chromosomes and in terms of what their roles might be