IGF-1 is not related to long-term outcome in hyperglycemic acute coronary syndrome patients

PURPOSE: Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) has been associated with both protective and detrimental effects on the development of ischemic heart disease. The relationship between IGF-1 levels and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between IGF-1 admission levels in hyperglycemic ACS patients and: (1) MACE over a 5 years follow-up, (2) type 2 diabetes at discharge, and (3) post-ACS myocardial infarct size and dysfunction. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of the BIOMArCS-2 randomized controlled trial. From July 2008 to February 2012, 276 ACS patients with admission plasma glucose level between 140 and 288 mg/dL were included. Records of the composite of all-cause mortality and recurrent non-fatal myocardial infarction were obtained during 5 years follow-up. Venous blood samples were collected on admission. IGF-1 was measured batchwise after study completion. Oral glucose tolerance test was performed to diagnose type 2 diabetes, whereas infarct size and left ventricular function were assessed by myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) imaging, 6 weeks post-ACS. RESULTS: Cumulative incidence of MACE was 24% at 5 years follow-up. IGF-1 was not independently associated with MACE (HR:1.00 (95%CI:0.99–1.00), p = 0.29). Seventy-eight patients (28%) had type 2 diabetes at discharge, and the highest quartile of IGF-1 levels was associated with the lowest incidence of diabetes (HR:0.40 (95%CI:0.17–0.95), p = 0.037). IGF-1 levels were not associated with post-ACS myocardial infarct size and dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: IGF-1 carries potential for predicting type 2 diabetes, rather than long-term cardiovascular outcomes and post-ACS myocardial infarct size and dysfunction, in hyperglycemic ACS patients

Clinical evaluation of geriatric outpatients with suspected heart failure:value of symptoms, signs, and additional tests

Aims Heart failure (HF) is common in geriatric patients. Clinicians face diagnostic challenges primarily due to comorbidity and limited access to echocardiography. The purpose of this study was to identify independent determinants of the presence of HF in geriatric outpatients and to determine the optimal diagnostic strategy. Methods and results Geriatric outpatients [mean age 82 (+/- 6) years, 30% men] with suspected HF underwent an extensive standardized diagnostic work-up. An expert consensus panel determined the presence of HF. Heart failure was present in 94 of 206 participants (46%). Male sex [odds ratio (OR) 2.0], age per 10 years (OR 1.6), nocturnal dyspnoea (OR 1.7), absence of wheezing (OR 2.1), loss of appetite (OR 1.7), and lower body mass index (BMI; OR 0.9) were independently associated with the presence of HF: the c-statistic of the model containing these items was 0.75. Of all additional tests, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) improved the diagnostic accuracy the most (OR ln NT-proBNP 2.8; c-statistic 0.92). A diagnostic rule, consisting of six clinical variables and NT-proBNP, showed good negative and positive predictive values. Conclusion Half of geriatric patients suspected of HF actually have HF. Apart from age, gender, and nocturnal dyspnoea, absence of wheezing, loss of appetite, and lower BMI were independently associated with the presence of HF. Symptoms and signs in combination with NT-proBNP reliably identified the presence or absence of HF in the vast majority of patients. Additional diagnostic tests, in particular echocardiography, can be targeted at those in whom the presence of HF remains uncertain and to ascertain the cause of HF

Real-World Effectiveness of Reslizumab in Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma - "First Initiators" and "Switchers"

BACKGROUND: Reslizumab, a biologic targeting interleukin-5 has been shown to reduce asthma exacerbations and maintenance oral corticosteroid (OCS) use in randomized controlled trials and pre-post studies in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. However, real-world effectiveness data of reslizumab are scarce, and it is unknown whether reslizumab has added value after switching from another type-2 biologic. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate (1) real-world effectiveness of reslizumab on severe asthma exacerbations, maintenance OCS-use and overall treatment response, both in biologic naïve patients who initiated reslizumab, and in patients who switched from another type-2 biologic. (2) physicians experience with reslizumab treatment. METHODS: This observational real-world study evaluated data from 134 adults with severe eosinophilic asthma included in the Dutch severe asthma registry (RAPSODI) who initiated reslizumab treatment (4-weekly infusions, 0.3 mg/kg) before April 2020 and had follow-up data ≥6 months. Clinical asthma experts completed surveys on their experience with reslizumab treatment. RESULTS: Overall, reslizumab reduced exacerbation rate (OR(95%CI): 0.10(0.05-0.21), p<0.001), oral corticosteroid use (OR(95%CI) 0.2(0.0-0.5), p<0.001) and maintenance dose, median(CI): 5.0(0.0-10.0) to 0.0(0.0-5.0), p<0.001), with comparable results in biologic-naïve reslizumab initiators and switchers. The overall response to reslizumab was graded 'good' or 'excellent' in 59.2% of patients. The additive effectiveness of reslizumab after switching from another biologic was reflected in physicians' surveys. CONCLUSION: Real-world data show that reslizumab reduces severe asthma exacerbations and oral corticosteroid use in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, both in biologic-naïve reslizumab initiators and in those who switched from another type-2 biologic. This additional value of reslizumab was recognized by clinical asthma experts

Real-World Effectiveness of Reslizumab in Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma - "First Initiators" and "Switchers"

BACKGROUND: Reslizumab, a biologic targeting interleukin-5 has been shown to reduce asthma exacerbations and maintenance oral corticosteroid (OCS) use in randomized controlled trials and pre-post studies in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. However, real-world effectiveness data of reslizumab are scarce, and it is unknown whether reslizumab has added value after switching from another type-2 biologic. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate (1) real-world effectiveness of reslizumab on severe asthma exacerbations, maintenance OCS-use and overall treatment response, both in biologic naïve patients who initiated reslizumab, and in patients who switched from another type-2 biologic. (2) physicians experience with reslizumab treatment. METHODS: This observational real-world study evaluated data from 134 adults with severe eosinophilic asthma included in the Dutch severe asthma registry (RAPSODI) who initiated reslizumab treatment (4-weekly infusions, 0.3 mg/kg) before April 2020 and had follow-up data ≥6 months. Clinical asthma experts completed surveys on their experience with reslizumab treatment. RESULTS: Overall, reslizumab reduced exacerbation rate (OR(95%CI): 0.10(0.05-0.21), p<0.001), oral corticosteroid use (OR(95%CI) 0.2(0.0-0.5), p<0.001) and maintenance dose, median(CI): 5.0(0.0-10.0) to 0.0(0.0-5.0), p<0.001), with comparable results in biologic-naïve reslizumab initiators and switchers. The overall response to reslizumab was graded 'good' or 'excellent' in 59.2% of patients. The additive effectiveness of reslizumab after switching from another biologic was reflected in physicians' surveys. CONCLUSION: Real-world data show that reslizumab reduces severe asthma exacerbations and oral corticosteroid use in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, both in biologic-naïve reslizumab initiators and in those who switched from another type-2 biologic. This additional value of reslizumab was recognized by clinical asthma experts