4 research outputs found
Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibilities of rapidly growing mycobacteria by Sensititre RAPMYCO panel
WOS: 000302339200009PubMed ID: 22378556This study used Sensititre RAPMYCO to test the activities of amikacin, cefoxitin, ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, doxycycline, imipenem, linezolid, sulfamehoxazole, tigecycline and tobramycin against 25 clinical isolates of rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM), including the common disease producing species Mycobacterium abscessus, Mycobacterium chelonae, Mycobacterium fortuitum and Mycobacterium peregrinum. Analysis of the four different RGM species showed that isolates of M. fortuitum and M. peregrinum were more susceptible than M. abscessus and M. chelonae. Different antimicrobials showed a variable sensitivity in all strains. Therefore, each species and strain must be individually evaluated, and it is always advisable to perform in vitro sensitivity tests before the treatment of infections due to RGM
Subungual myiasis in a woman with psychiatric disturbance
WOS: 000260514600016PubMed ID: 18571464Myiasis is caused by the invasion of tissues or organs of men and animals by dipterous larvae. The disease is infrequent in Turkey. A case of a 65-year-old woman having been initially diagnosed with chronic psychosis, and found to have a left big toe nail invaded by the larvae of Calliphora spp., is presented. A total of 17 maggots were removed from the left big toe of the patient, which were then determined as Calliphora spp. The patient has undergone surgical withdrawal of both nails of her big toes, followed by the administration of oral prophylactic antimicrobial treatment. This is the second recorded case of subungual myiasis by Calliphora spp. in Turkey. Myiasis should be considered in patients with lower personal hygiene, especially with chronic psychiatric disturbances. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved
A Multicenter Analysis of Subjectivity of Indirect Immunofluorescence Test in Antinuclear Antibody Screening
Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the interpretation of the antinuclear antibody (ANA)-indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) test results based on the interpreter-related subjectivity and to examine the inter-center agreement rates with the performance of each laboratory