Creating Excellence in Dementia Care: A Research Review for Ireland's National Dementia Strategy

Examines the prevalence and economic and social costs of dementia; policies, practices, and data on health and social care services in community-based, acute care, and long-term residential settings; and proposed elements for a new strategy

Postponing Maternity in Ireland

As in many other developed countries, Ireland in recent decades has experienced a postponement of maternity. In this paper we consider the main trends in this phenomenon, considering changes in first and later births separately. We adapt the theoretical model due to Walker (1995) to incorporate a declining marginal return to experience to provide a human capital/career planning explanation for this postponement. We estimate a hazard model based upon the 1994 Living in Ireland Survey to empirically test this model. The career-planning hypothesis was found to hold. However an assumption about perfect capital markets failed indicating the impact of an income effect on the timing of maternity. The model also identified the importance of cohort differences in the timing of marriage in explaining much of the inter-cohort specific differences in the timing of maternity.labour markets, fertility

Genio Dementia Programme Year 1

This report examines the workings of the Genio programme in 2013, the first year of operation, and its impact in relation to the public awareness of dementia, diagnosis, community-based supports, integrated provision, and sustainability. The report also covers the relevance and implications of the Genio programme over the coming years for public policy and its role in heralding and showcasing a new, person-centred approach to dementia care in Ireland. The report draws on information provided by Genio, information-gathering visits to each site to meet with key personnel, and a structured questionnaire completed by each site as part of this evaluation process (see Appendix A), which invited the sites to reflect on their progress in the first year

Multiple stakeholders' perspectives on respite service access for people with dementia and their carers

Background and Objectives: People with dementia and carers do not always access respite services in a timely manner, or in some cases, at all. Although carers’ perspectives on respite access have been explored, other stakeholder perspectives, especially providers and people with dementia, are underrepresented in the existing literature. The aim of this study was to synthesize multiple stakeholders’ perspectives, including people with dementia, on accessing respite services in the context of dementia. Research Design and Methods: Purposive maximum variation sampling was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 35 key stakeholders, including people with dementia (n = 6), carers (n = 9), respite frontline staff (n = 4), respite managers (n = 8), primary care professionals (n = 3), and policy-makers/academics (n = 5). The process of consent is outlined. Data were interpreted inductively using thematic analysis. Reflexivity was considered throughout the research process. Results: Three themes (“Service Acceptability,” “Navigational Knowledge and Skills,” “Constructing and Adjudicating Respite Need”) were identified that relate to how access to respite services is negotiated between service providers and dyads. Discussion and Implications: A number of the findings support previous research; however, novel findings discussed relating to the access negotiation process include (a) the ambiguous legitimacy of respite needs, in a system configured to deliver a biomedical model of care and which considers nonmedical care as a family responsibility, and (b) the constraining effects of disparate conceptualizations of “respite” between carers and providers. Future research should interrogate the appropriate boundaries of public responsibility in relation to respite service planning/delivery for dementia, with particular reference to client preferences for community and in-home provision

The Role of Migrant Care Workers in Ageing Societies: Report on Research Findings in the U.K., Ireland, Canada and the U.S.

Migrants play an increasingly significant role in caring for the elderly due to a growing number of older people and declining domestic labour supplies, according to this report in the IOM Migration Research Series. It examines the demand for migrant care workers; compares the experiences of migrants, employers and older people; and presents recommendations for addressing the increasing significance of elder care and its implications for migrant labour

Respite in dementia: an evolutionary concept analysis

Aim: There is a lack of conceptual clarity around ‘respite’ as it relates to people with dementia and their carers. This study provides clarification on the use and meaning of the term and considers the concept in relation to the dominant care paradigm in dementia, i.e. person-centred care. Methods: Rodgers’ (1989) evolutionary framework was employed. A systematic search was conducted on the Pubmed/MedLine, Embase, Cinahl, PsychInfo, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane databases (1980–2016, English) with fixed search terms relating to ‘respite’ and ‘dementia’. Papers with primary qualitative data and literature reviews were included. This search was supplemented with snowballing techniques (back/forward searching, generic search engines). Data were analysed thematically, through an iterative process of constant comparison. Results: Respite is understood both as a service that provides a physical break for the carer and as a psychological outcome, i.e. a mental break for the carer, which can be facilitated by formal services, under certain conditions. The conceptual model outlines how client factors (dyadic relations, recognising/accepting need, carer psychosocial issues, restorative occupation, and stigma) and service factors (model/characteristics, care quality, staff expertise, meaningful occupation for people with dementia and communication and support), interact to influence a respite outcome. The key antecedent for a positive respite experience is that the carer perceives that mutual benefit is garnered from service use. Conclusion: The term respite can be interpreted as both a service and an outcome. However, it is clear that ‘respite’, as currently understood, acknowledges the relational experience of the carer only; it is, therefore, potentially damaging to the planning and delivery of person-centred dementia care. We suggest ‘restorative care’ as a potential alternative nomenclature to respite care, thereby highlighting the importance of providing mutual, personalised health and social care services that serve to enhance care relationships rather than diminish them

The Role and Future Development of Nursing Homes in Ireland

Against a background of rapid growth in the number of private nursing home beds, this report draws together theoretical insights and factual material on a range of relevant issues concerning the future of nursing homes in Ireland. It sets out the factors likely to influence the future demand for and provision of nursing homes in Ireland. The study deals with the demographic, social, economic and policy variables which should be taken into consideration. The study bears out the importance of policy in determining the future direction and role of nursing homes. Financing arrangements and incentive structures play a critical role in the allocation of resources between home and institutional settings

Key stakeholders' experiences of respite services for people with dementia and their perspectives on respite service development: a qualitative systematic review

Background: Respite services provide a break in the caregiving relationship for people with dementia and their carers, however they are often under-used and service acceptability can be low. This study aims to understand key stakeholders' experiences of respite services for people with dementia, with a view to informing respite service development. Methods: A systematic search was conducted of the Pubmed/MedLine, Embase, Cinahl, PsychInfo, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases (1980-2016, English) with fixed search terms relating to 'respite' and 'dementia', following PRISMA guidelines. Noblit and Hare's approach to meta-ethnography was employed. Key concepts were identified across the papers and reciprocal and refutational translation techniques were applied to primary studies; findings were synthesized into third order interpretations and finally, a 'line-of-argument' was developed. Results: In total 23 papers were reviewed, which described 20 independent samples across 12 countries. The views of 889 participants were synthesized (13 people with dementia, 690 carers, 44 'service providers', 52 frontline staff, 70 managers, 12 volunteers, six academic/policy-makers, and two independent consultants). Five key concepts were identified and outlined i.e. 1) the transition to service use 2) expanding organizational capacity 3) dementia care quality 4) building a collaborative care partnership and 5) dyad restoration. There was broad agreement around the key areas for service development across the range of stakeholders (flexible and responsive person-centred care, meaningful activity for people with dementia, enhanced client-service communication and informational support). However, there was clear divergence in stakeholder perspectives around the barriers to implementation of such developments. Organizational tension was evident between frontline staff and management in respite services, hindering the cultural change necessary to facilitate service development in line with dyad's needs and preferences. Conclusion: Respite services must surmount internal organizational barriers to change, and cultivate a collaborative solution-focused care culture, which acknowledges the centrality of the dyad and their care preferences. Future research should explore the development of alternative/modified community respite service models, which have greater capacity to be responsive to the needs of each individual dyad. The perspectives of people with dementia must be included in research in this area going forward

Predicting admission to long‐term care and mortality among community‐based, dependent older people in Ireland

Objective: To identify factors that predict admission to long‐term care (LTC) and mortality among community‐based, dependent older people in Ireland, who were in receipt of formal home support. Methods: An audit was conducted of all community‐dwelling older adults receiving government funded home support during 2017 in the Dublin North Central, Health Service Executive administrative area. Data were extracted from the Common Summary Assessment Report (CSAR), a mandatory form used in the provision of home support. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine the factors associCorrespondence A. Warters, PhD, Community Healthcare Organisation, Ballymun Healthcare Facility, Dublin, Ireland. Email: [email protected] ated with admission to LTC and mortality, with the results presented as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals. Results: The audit comprised 1597 community‐dwelling older adults with a mean age of 83.3 (SD: 7.2) years. The prevalence of transition to LTC and mortality was 8%and 9%, respectively, during the 12‐month period. Factors significantly associated with admission to LTC were “cognitive dysfunction” [OR 2.10 (1.41‐3.14), P < .001] and the intensity of home support [OR 1.05 (1.01‐1.06), P < .003], as measured by weekly formal care hours. Physical dependency and advanced age (aged 95 years +) were significantly associated with mortality in this population (P < .001). Conclusion: “Cognitive dysfunction” and intensity of formal home support were associated with transition to LTC, while physical dependency and advanced age were associated with mortality. Investment in personalised, cognitive‐specific, services and supports are necessary to keep people with dementia and related cognitive impairments living at home for longer

Intensive home care supports, informal care and private provision for people with dementia in Ireland.

BACKGROUND: This study analysed the cost of intensive home care packages for people with dementia living on the boundary of home care and residential care facilities in Ireland. The cost of community-based services and supports, including informal care and private out-of-pocket expenditure, was compared to the cost of public and private residential care. METHODS: The study recruited 42 people with dementia and/or their caregivers, who were living on the boundary of home care and residential care, to an in-depth study on the cost of care. The Resource Utilization in Dementia scale was used to collect data on the utilization of standard formal care and informal care by people with dementia in receipt of an intensive home care package. Information on private out-of-pocket expenditure on care was also collected. Unit costs were assigned and community-based care was compared with public and private residential care alternatives. RESULTS: The average weekly cost of home care, including the intensive home care package, standard formal community care provision, medications, consumption and housing, was estimated at €1127. This is lower than the average weekly cost of public long-stay care facilities (€1526) and around the same as for private nursing home fees in the Dublin region (€1149). When the opportunity cost valuation of informal care is included, the cost of home care is higher than all types of residential care. Adding private care expenditure further inflates the cost of home care. CONCLUSION: Keeping highly dependent people with dementia living at home is not cheap and raises questions about optimal resource allocation on the boundary of home care and residential care. Even with significant public spending on intensive home care packages, family care costs remain high. So too does private out-of-pocket expenditure on care for some people with dementia