27 research outputs found

    A clinical link between apoptosis and autoimmunity

    No full text

    MCTD: a concept which stood the test of time

    No full text

    Diagnosis and risk stratification in patients with anti-RNP autoimmunity

    No full text
    INTRODUCTION: Anti-RNP autoantibodies occur either in Mixed Connective Tissue Disease (MCTD) (with a frequently favorable prognosis), or in systemic lupus (SLE) cases with aggressive major organ disease. It is uncertain how to assess for the risk of severe disease in anti-RNP+ patients. METHODS: Following IRB-approved protocols, clinical data and blood was collected from patients with known or suspected anti-RNP autoimmunity and normal controls in a cohort study. Samples were screened for parameters of immune activation. Groups were compared based on clinical diagnoses, disease classification criteria, disease activity, and specific end-organ clinical manifestations. RESULTS: 97% of patients satisfying Alarcon-Segovia MCTD criteria also met SLICC SLE criteria, while 47% of the anti-RNP+ SLE patients also met MCTD criteria. Among SLICC SLE patients, MCTD criteria were associated with reduced rates of renal disease (Odds Ratio 4.3, 95% confidence interval 1.3–14.0), increased rates of Raynaud’s Phenomenon (OR 3.5, 95% c.i. 1.3–9.5), and increased serum BCMA, TACI, and TNFa levels. Circulating immune markers and markers of Type I Interferon activation were not effective at distinguishing clinical subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Among anti-RNP patients, the question of MCTD versus SLE is not either/or: most MCTD patients also have lupus. MCTD classification criteria (but not a broad set of immune markers) distinguish a subset of SLE patients at reduced risk for renal disease

    Epitope mapping of the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and mixed connective tissue disease

    No full text
    Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) are autoimmune illnesses characterized by the presence of high titers of autoantibodies directed against a wide range of ‘self ’ antigens. Proteins of the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle (U1 snRNP) are among the most immunogenic molecules in patients with SLE and MCTD. The recent release of a crystallized U1 snRNP provides a unique opportunity to evaluate the effects of tertiary and quaternary structures on autoantigenicity within the U1 snRNP. In the present study, an epitope map was created using the U1 snRNP crystal structure. A total of 15 peptides were tested in a cohort of 68 patients with SLE, 29 with MCTD and 26 healthy individuals and mapped onto the U1 snRNP structure. Antigenic sites were detected in a variety of structures and appear to include RNA binding domains, but mostly exclude regions necessary for protein–protein interactions. These data suggest that while some autoantibodies may target U1 snRNP proteins as monomers or apoptosis-induced, protease-digested fragments, others may recognize epitopes on assembled protein subcomplexes of the U1 snRNP. Although nearly all of the peptides are strong predictors of autoimmune illness, none were successful at distinguishing between SLE and MCTD. The antigenicity of some peptides significantly correlated with several clinical symptoms. This investigation implicitly highlights the complexities of autoimmune epitopes, and autoimmune illnesses in general, and demonstrates the variability of antigens in patient populations, all of which contribute to difficult clinical diagnoses

    Apoptosis-linked changes in the phosphorylation status and subcellular localization of the spliceosomal autoantigen U1-70K.

    No full text
    Contains fulltext : 69873.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)Apoptosis consists of highly regulated pathways involving post-translational modifications and cleavage of proteins leading to sequential inactivation of the main cellular processes. Here, we focused on the apoptotic processing of one of the essential components of the mRNA splicing machinery, the U1-70K snRNP protein. We found that at an early stage of apoptosis, before the cleavage of the C-terminal part of the protein by caspase-3, the basal phosphorylation of the Ser140 residue located within the RNA recognition motif, increases very significantly. A caspase-dependent, PP1-mediated dephosphorylation of other serine residues takes place in a subset of U1-70K proteins. The U1-70K protein phosphorylated at Ser140 is clustered in heterogeneous ectopic RNP-derived structures, which are finally extruded in apoptotic bodies. The elaborate processing of the spliceosomal U1-70K protein we identified might play an important role in the regulated breakdown of the mRNA splicing machinery during early apoptosis. In addition, these specific changes in the phosphorylation/dephosphorylation balance and the subcellular localization of the U1-70K protein might explain why the region encompassing the Ser140 residue becomes a central autoantigen during the autoimmune disease systemic lupus erythematosus

    Can SLE classification rules be effectively applied to diagnose unclear SLE cases?

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: Develop a novel classification criteria to distinguish between unclear SLE and MCTD cases. METHODS: A total of 205 variables from 111 SLE and 55 MCTD patients were evaluated to uncover unique molecular and clinical markers for each disease. Binomial logistic regressions (BLR) were performed on currently used SLE and MCTD classification criteria sets to obtain six reduced models with power to discriminate between unclear SLE and MCTD patients which were confirmed by Receiving Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Decision trees were employed to delineate novel classification rules to discriminate between unclear SLE and MCTD patients. RESULTS: SLE and MCTD patients exhibited contrasting molecular markers and clinical manifestations. Furthermore, reduced models highlighted SLE patients exhibit prevalence of skin rashes and renal disease while MCTD cases show dominance of myositis and muscle weakness. Additionally decision trees analyses revealed a novel classification rule tailored to differentiate unclear SLE and MCTD patients (Lu-vs-M) with an overall accuracy of 88%. CONCLUSIONS: Validation of our novel proposed classification rule (Lu-vs-M) includes novel contrasting characteristics (calcinosis, CPK elevated and anti-IgM reactivity for U1-70K, U1A and U1C) between SLE and MCTD patients and showed a 33% improvement in distinguishing these disorders when compare to currently used classification criteria sets. Pending additional validation, our novel classification rule is a promising method to distinguish between patients with unclear SLE and MCTD diagnosis
    corecore