35 research outputs found

    Ligand-Directed Reactivity in Dioxygen and Water Binding to cis-[Pd(NHC)2(2O2)]

    No full text
    Reaction of [Pd(IPr)(2)] (IPr = 1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene) and O-2 leads to the surprising discovery that at low temperature the initial reaction product is a highly labile peroxide complex cis-[Pd(IPr)(2)(eta(2)-O-2)]. At temperatures greater than or similar to -40 degrees C, cis-[Pd(IPr)(2)(eta(2)-O-2)] adds a second O-2 to form trans-[Pd(IPr)(2)(eta(1)-O-2)(2)]. Squid magnetometry and EPR studies yield data that are consistent with a singlet diradical ground state with a thermally accessible triplet state for this unique bis-superoxide complex. In addition to reaction with O-2 , cis-[Pd(IPr)(2)(eta(2)-O-2)] reacts at low temperature with H2O in methanol/ether solution to form trans-[Pd(IPr)(2)(OH)(OOH)]. The crystal structure of trans-[Pd(IPr)(2)(OOH) (OH)] is reported. Neither reaction with O-2 nor reaction with H2O occurs under comparable conditions for cis-[Pd(IMes)(2)(eta(2)-O-2)] (IMes = 1,3-bis(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene). The increased reactivity of cis-[Pd(IPr)(2)(eta(2)-O-2)] is attributed to the enthalpy of binding of O-2 to [Pd(IPr)(2)] (-14.5 +/- 1.0 kcal/mol) that is approximately one-half that of [Pd(IMes)(2)] (-27.9 +/- 1.5 kcal/mol). Computational studies identify the cause as interligand repulsion forcing a wider C-Pd-C angle and tilting of the NHC plane in cis-[Pd(IPr)(2)(eta(2)-O-2)]. Arene-arene interactions are more favorable and serve to further stabilize. cis-[Pd(IMes)(2)(eta(2)-O-2)]. Inclusion of dispersion effects in DFT calculations leads to improved agreement between experimental and computational enthalpies of O-2 binding. A complete reaction diagram is constructed for formation of trans-[Pd(IPr)(2)(eta(1)-O-2)(2)] and leads to the conclusion that kinetic factors inhibit formation of trans-[Pd(IMes)(2)(eta(1)-O-2)(2)] at the low temperatures at which it is thermodynamically favored. Failure to detect the predicted T-shaped intermediate trans-[Pd(NHC)(2)(eta(1)-O-2)] for either NHC = IMes or IPr is attributed to dynamic effects. A partial potential energy diagram for initial binding of O-2 is constructed. A range of low-energy pathways at different angles of approach are present and blur the distinction between pure "side-on" or "end-on" trajectories for oxygen binding

    Thermodynamic, kinetic, and computational study of heavier chalcogen (S, Se, and Te) terminal multiple bonds to molybdenum, carbon, and phosphorus

    No full text
    Enthalpies of chalcogen atom transfer to Mo(N[t-Bu]Ar)(3), where Ar = 3,5-C(6)H(3)Me(2), and to IPr (defined as bis-(2,6-isopropylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene) have been measured by solution calorimetry leading to bond energy estimates (kcal/mol) for EMo(N[t-Bu]Ar)(3) (E = S, 115; Se, 87; Te, 64) and EIPr (E = S, 102; Se, 77; Te, 53). The enthalpy of S-atom transfer to PMo(N[t-Bu]Ar)(3) generating SPMo(N[t-Bu]Ar)(3) has been measured, yielding a value of only 78 kcal/mol. The kinetics of combination of Mo(N[t-Bu]Ar)(3) with SMo(N[t-Bu]Ar)(3) yielding (mu-S)[Mo(N[t-Bu]Ar)(3)](2) have been studied, and yield activation parameters Delta H double dagger = 4.7 +/- 1 kcal/mol and Delta S double dagger = -33 +/- 5 eu. Equilibrium studies for the same reaction yielded thermochemical parameters Delta H degrees = -18.6 +/- 3.2 kcal/mol and Delta S degrees = -56.2 +/- 10.5 eu. The large negative entropy of formation of (mu-S)[Mo(N[t-Bu]Ar)(3)](2) is interpreted in terms of the crowded molecular structure of this complex as revealed by X-ray crystallography. The crystal structure of Te-atom transfer agent TePCy(3) is also reported. Quantum chemical calculations were used to make bond energy predictions as well as to probe terminal chalcogen bonding in terms of an energy partitioning analysis

    Thermodynamic, kinetic, and computational study of heavier chalcogen (S, Se, and Te) terminal multiple bonds to molybdenum, carbon, and phosphorus

    No full text
    Enthalpies of chalcogen atom transfer to Mo(N[t-Bu]Ar)(3), where Ar = 3,5-C6H3Me2, and to IPr (defined as bis-(2,6-isopropylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene) have been measured by solution calorimetry leading to bond energy estimates (kcal/mol) for EMo(N[t-Bu]Ar)(3) (E = S, 115; Se, 87; Te, 64) and EIPr (E = S, 102; Se, 77; Te, 53). The enthalpy of S-atom transfer to PMo(N[t-Bu]Ar)(3) generating SPMo(N[t-Bu]Ar)(3) has been measured, yielding a value of only 78 kcal/mol. The kinetics of combination of Mo(N[t-Bu]Ar)(3) with SMo(N[t-Bu]Ar)(3) yielding (mu-S)[Mo(N[t-Bu]Ar)(3)](2) have been studied, and yield activation parameters Delta H double dagger = 4.7 +/- 1 kcal/mol and Delta S double dagger = -33 +/- 5 eu. Equilibrium studies for the same reaction yielded thermochemical parameters Delta H degrees = -18.6 +/- 3.2 kcal/mol and Delta S degrees = -56.2 +/- 10.5 eu. The large negative entropy of formation of (mu-S)[Mo(N[t-Bu]Ar)(3)](2) is interpreted in terms of the crowded molecular structure of this complex as revealed by X-ray crystallography. The crystal structure of Te-atom transfer agent TePCy3 is also reported. Quantum chemical calculations were used to make bond energy predictions as well as to probe terminal chalcogen bonding in terms of an energy partitioning analysis.</p
    corecore