81 research outputs found

    Survivability in hierarchical telecommunications networks under dual homing

    Get PDF
    Cataloged from PDF version of article.The motivation behind this study is the essential need for survivability in the telecommunications networks. An optical signal should find its destination even if the network experiences an occasional fiber cut. We consider the design of a two-level survivable telecommunications network. Terminals compiling the access layer communicate through hubs forming the backbone layer. To hedge against single link failures in the network, we require the backbone subgraph to be two-edge connected and the terminal nodes to connect to the backbone layer in a dual-homed fashion, i.e., at two distinct hubs. The underlying design problem partitions a given set of nodes into hubs and terminals, chooses a set of connections between the hubs such that the resulting backbone network is two-edge connected, and for each terminal chooses two hubs to provide the dual-homing backbone access. All of these decisions are jointly made based on some cost considerations. We give alternative formulations using cut inequalities, compare these formulations, provide a polyhedral analysis of the smallsized formulation, describe valid inequalities, study the associated separation problems, and design variable fixing rules. All of these findings are then utilized in devising an efficient branch-and-cut algorithm to solve this network design problem

    Modelling critical illness claim diagnosis rates II: results

    No full text
    This is Paper II in a series of two papers. In Paper I we developed a methodology for estimating and graduating Critical Illness (CI) insurance diagnosis rates. In this paper we use data from the UK for 1999–2005 supplied by the Continuous Mortality Investigation (CMI) to illustrate our methodology by deriving and discussing all causes and cause specific critical illness diagnosis rate

    Modelling critical illness claim diagnosis rates II: results

    No full text
    This is Paper II in a series of two papers. In Paper I we developed a methodology for estimating and graduating Critical Illness (CI) insurance diagnosis rates. In this paper we use data from the UK for 1999–2005 supplied by the Continuous Mortality Investigation (CMI) to illustrate our methodology by deriving and discussing all causes and cause specific critical illness diagnosis rate
    corecore