46 research outputs found
Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of the preparation benzydamine hydrochloride
Introduction. With an increase in the level of acquired antibiotic resistance of pathogens, treatment becomes more complicated and slows down, especially in infections associated with biofilms. There is a growing need for the development and use of new antibacterial drugs with specific antimicrobial activity.Aim. To study the antimicrobial action and the dynamics of the formation of resistance to benzydamine hydrochloride from a various infection agents.Β Materials and methods. To obtain biofilms, microorganisms were cultivated in flat-bottomed culture plates. Planktonic cells were obtained by suspending and reseeding single colonies of the daily culture into flat-bottomed culture plates. To determine the antimicrobial activity of the studied preparations, two-fold dilutions were prepared and added to the wells of the plate with a bacterial culture. The dynamics of the formation of resistance to benzydamine hydrochloride was studied by passaging the cultures in a liquid nutrient medium with increasing concentrations of the antiseptic by a twofold step. After 2β3 days of incubation from a test tube with the maximum concentration of the drug, in which bacterial growth was observed, the bacteria were transferred to new ones with higher concentrations of the drug.Results. It was shown that benzydamine hydrochloride showed a high level of activity against bacteria M. catarrhalis and yeast-like fungi C. albicans. A slightly lower activity of the drug was noted for bacteria of the species S. aureus and E. coli, however, within the limits of the therapeutic concentration of the drug in finished dosage forms. Benzydamine hydrochloride had a significantly higher level of antibacterial activity against pre-formed biofilms compared to drugs such as chlorhexidine and hexetidine. An analysis of the dynamics of the formation of resistance to the drug benzydamine hydrochloride in microorganisms of various species showed that the possibility of developing resistance to benzydamine hydrochloride is extremely small. The process of adaptation was observed only in E. coli. The studied strains of the species S. aureus, C. albicans, and M. catarrhalis did not acquire resistance to the test drug.Conclusion. Benzydamine hydrochloride can be effectively used against a wide range of pathogens of ENT infections, as it has been shown to have a significantly higher level of antibacterial activity against pre-formed biofilms, various types of bacteria and yeast-like fungi and an extremely low level of resistance compared to other antiseptic drugs
ΠΠ°Π½Π΄ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΡ Ρ ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ : ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΡΠΈΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Ρ Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΡΠΈΠ±ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠΌ Π»Π΅ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²Π°ΠΌ, Π³Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Candida spp.
Relevance. The global trend of rapid increase in resistance to antifungal drugs due to multiple factors, dictates the need for continuous monitoring of taxonomic structure and susceptibility of nosocomial pathogens, causing invasive fungal infections, for permanent correction of the optimal prevention and treatment strategies.Purpose: to determine antifungal susceptibility of the main yeast pathogens in candidemia in cancer patients, as well as to determine resistance genes and pathogenic factor genes.Material and Methods. Eighty-two strains of Candida spp. isolated from blood of cancer patients from 2015 to 2021 were analyzed. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of fuconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, anidulafungin and micafungin were determined by a gradient method (E-test, BioMerieux, France). The EUCAST and CLSI criteria were used for MIC value assessment. The genes, associated with pathogenicity factors, and resistance to antifungal drugs were identifed.Results. Our study results based on EUCAST 2020, v.10.0 criteria showed that triazoles, especially fuconazole, were the least effective drugs in empirical therapy for invasive candidiasis (including candidemia). Resistance of Candida spp. fuconazole was superior to that of voriconazole (47.2 % vs 23.2 %, respectively, p<0.01) and posaconazole (47.2 % vs 30.4 %, respectively, p><0.05). The highest in vitro activity was observed in echinocandins, and anidulafungin was 2 times more active than micafungin (4.1 % of resistant strains vs 11.4 %, respectively), with no statistically signifcant difference (p>0.05). The ERG11 and FKS1 genes associated with resistance to antifungal drugs were detected in 28.6 % of Candida spp. strains. The ERG11 gene was detected in 8.6 % of cases, exclusively in Candida albicans strains. The FKS1 gene was identifed in 20.0 % of strains (85.7 % of them were C. parapsilosis, 7.1 % each were C. tropicalis and C. glabrata). Pathogenic factor genes were identifed in 78.6 % of C. albicans and in 79.1 % of C. parapsilosis strains.Conclusion. Molecular genetic methods for the detection of Candida spp strains carrying resistance genes to antifungal drugs, and the determination of pathogenicity factors are promising trends in searching for biomarkers. They facilitate interpretation of results of microbiological study to assess the ability of Candida spp. strains to develop invasive mycoses.ΠΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ. ΠΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ ΡΠ΅Π½Π΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΡΠΈΠ±ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ°Ρ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π° ΡΠΎ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, Π΄ΠΈΠΊΡΡΠ΅Ρ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½Π³Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π²ΠΎΠ·Π±ΡΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΈΠ½Π²Π°Π·ΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
Π³ΡΠΈΠ±ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΡΠ½Π³Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ Π»Π΅ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²Π°ΠΌ Ρ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½Π²Π°Π·ΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
Π³ΡΠΈΠ±ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΉ.Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ β ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΡΠ½Π³Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
Π²ΠΎΠ·Π±ΡΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΊΠ°Π½Π΄ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠΈ Ρ ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ.ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π» ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ. ΠΡΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ 82 ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠ° Candida spp., Π²ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ· ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈ ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 2015β21 Π³Π³. ΠΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ½Π³ΠΈΠ±ΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½Π°Π·ΠΎΠ»Π°, Π²ΠΎΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ½Π°Π·ΠΎΠ»Π°, ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π°Π·ΠΎΠ»Π°, Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ»Π°ΡΡΠ½Π³ΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠ½Π³ΠΈΠ½Π° Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π³ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ (Π-ΡΠ΅ΡΡ, BioMerieux, France). ΠΠ»Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΠΠ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΈ EUCAST ΠΈ CLSI. ΠΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ Π³Π΅Π½Ρ, Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Ρ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΡΠΈΠ±ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠΌ Π»Π΅ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²Π°ΠΌ.Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ. ΠΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ (ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΈ EUCAST) Π² ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΡΠΌΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ½Π²Π°Π·ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠ°Π½Π΄ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ·Π° (Π² Ρ. Ρ. ΠΊΠ°Π½Π΄ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠΈ) Π½Π°ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π΅ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ ΡΡΠΈΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ»Ρ, ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½Π°Π·ΠΎΠ», ΠΊ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΌΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΡ Candida spp. ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½Ρ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ Π²ΠΎΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ½Π°Π·ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΌ (47,2 % ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² 23,2 %, p<0,01) ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π°Π·ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΌ (47,2 % ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² 30,4 %, p><0,05). ΠΠ°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ°Ρ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ in vitro ΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π½Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ², ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ»Π°ΡΡΠ½Π³ΠΈΠ½ Π² 2 ΡΠ°Π·Π° Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½Π΅Π΅ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠ½Π³ΠΈΠ½Π° (4,1 % ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² 11,4 %), Π½ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΌ Π½Π΅ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ. ΠΠ΅Π½Ρ ERG11 ΠΈ FKS1, Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Ρ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΊ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΡΠΈΠ±ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌ, Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ Ρ 28,6 % ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ² Candida spp.. ΠΠ΅Π½ ERG11 Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ Π² 8,6 % ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Π², ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ Ρ ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ² Candida albicans. ΠΠ΅Π½ FKS1 ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ Ρ 20,0 % ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ² (85,7 % β C. parapsilosis, ΠΏΠΎ 7,1 % β C. tropicalis ΠΈ C. glabrata). ΠΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ Ρ 78,6 % ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ² C. albicans ΠΈ Ρ 79,1 % ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΎΠ² C. parapsilosis. ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ² Candida spp., Π½Π΅ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
Π³Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΡΠ½Π³Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌ, ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ β><Β 0,01) ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π°Π·ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΌ (47,2 % ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² 30,4 %, p<0,05). ΠΠ°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ°Ρ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ in vitro ΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π½Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ², ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ»Π°ΡΡΠ½Π³ΠΈΠ½ Π² 2 ΡΠ°Π·Π° Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½Π΅Π΅ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠ½Π³ΠΈΠ½Π° (4,1 % ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² 11,4 %), Π½ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΌ Π½Π΅ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ. ΠΠ΅Π½Ρ ERG11 ΠΈ FKS1, Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Ρ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΊ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΡΠΈΠ±ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌ, Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ Ρ 28,6 % ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ² Candida spp.. ΠΠ΅Π½ ERG11 Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ Π² 8,6 % ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Π², ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ Ρ ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ² Candida albicans. ΠΠ΅Π½ FKS1 ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ Ρ 20,0 % ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ² (85,7 % β C. parapsilosis, ΠΏΠΎ 7,1 % β C. tropicalis ΠΈ C. glabrata). ΠΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ Ρ 78,6 % ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ² C. albicans ΠΈ Ρ 79,1 % ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΎΠ² C. parapsilosis. ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ² Candida spp., Π½Π΅ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
Π³Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΡΠ½Π³Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌ, ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ β>< 0,05). ΠΠ°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ°Ρ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ in vitro ΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π½Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ², ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ»Π°ΡΡΠ½Π³ΠΈΠ½ Π² 2 ΡΠ°Π·Π° Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½Π΅Π΅ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠ½Π³ΠΈΠ½Π° (4,1 % ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² 11,4 %), Π½ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΌ Π½Π΅ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ. ΠΠ΅Π½Ρ ERG11 ΠΈ FKS1, Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Ρ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΊ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΡΠΈΠ±ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌ, Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ Ρ 28,6 % ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ² Candida spp.. ΠΠ΅Π½ ERG11 Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ Π² 8,6 % ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Π², ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ Ρ ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ² Candida albicans. ΠΠ΅Π½ FKS1 ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ Ρ 20,0 % ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ² (85,7 % β C. parapsilosis, ΠΏΠΎ 7,1 % β C. tropicalis ΠΈ C. glabrata). ΠΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ Ρ 78,6 % ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ² C. albicans ΠΈ Ρ 79,1 % ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΎΠ² C. parapsilosis.ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ² Candida spp., Π½Π΅ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
Π³Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΡΠ½Π³Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌ, ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ β ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΈΡΠΊΠ° Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠΊΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ², ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΡ Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΡ ΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ΅ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ² Candida spp. ΠΊ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½Π²Π°Π·ΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ²
On the Issue of the Berber Written Tradition
The article is devoted to the study of the linguistic tradition of the Berbers, who are the indigenous people of North Africa. The Berbers have maintained a rich tradition of spoken language. At the turn of the 20th β21st centuries, against the backdrop of the intensification of the movement for selfβdetermination, their cultural and linguistic rights, the Berbers launched a largeβscale activity aimed at restoring the national written language. The author suggested that the need to develop standardized writing was partly due to the desire of the Berbers to consolidate the official status of their language in the Constitution. The author notes that the aggravation of the soβcalled βBerber questionβ at the end of the 20th century spurred the interest of scientists and researchers in the Berber written heritage. Most of the surviving handwritten documents make Berber texts (mostly religious), recorded using the Arabic alphabet between the 15th and early 20th centuries. The study of conditions for their creation and fields of their application shows that these texts played a significant role in the dissemination of religious and scientific knowledge among the Berbers. It is concluded that despite the use of the predominantly oral form of the language, the Berbers managed to create a unique written tradition. The article discusses in detail the main problems of the study of Berber manuscripts, among which: the requirement from the researcher of serious preβknowledge in various fields; the problem of accessibility of texts stored in private collections; the need to develop unified approaches to the description of Berber manuscripts, their digitization and other important arrangements to ensure the availability of documents for the scientificβresearch community. Particular attention is paid to the history of the creation of the first collections of Berber manuscripts and their cataloging. The author has also highlighted the work of scientists, who made a qualitative contribution to the study of the Berber manuscripts, most of which have not yet been discovered and carry significant potential aimed at preβ serving and enhancing the Berber cultural and historical heritage
Does the wall thickness of the left atrial appendage and its isthmus depend on their macroscopic characteristics?
Knowledge in interrelations between gross anatomy of the left atrial appendage (LAA) and thickness of the walls of LAA and periauricular area enables decreasing operational risks in LAA ostium occluding and Β«Cox-MazeΒ» surgery for atrial fibrillation. The aim of the study was to identify significant interrelations between the macroscopic characteristics of the LAA (size, shape, number of lobes) and the parameters of the wall thickness of the LAA and its isthmus. Material and methods. The study includes 50 heart specimens of patients died from non-cardiac diseases. We examined 60 anatomical sections from 30 hearts by means Olympus SZX2-ZB10 microscope, and histological slices from 20 hearts. Results. The layers of the LAA wall were thinner than those in the isthmus. The thickness of LAA walls did not show direct correlation with the external dimensions of LAA. We found inverse correlation (Rs = β 0.4, p < 0,05) between the thickness of the myocardium, endocardium and some external sizes of LAA. The wall thickness of Β«chicken wingΒ», Β«cauliflowerΒ» and Β«arrowheadΒ» was the same. The wall of single-lobe LAA was thinner than that of two-lobed LAA (p = 0.036). The LAA isthmus wall was thinner (p = 0.03) in hearts with Β«cauliflowerΒ» LAA compared to hearts with LAA resembled a Β«chicken wingΒ». Differences in wall thickness in LAA of various shapes were due to the degree of subepicardial fatty tissue development. Intracardiac operations should be done with the utmost care in patients with Β«cauliflowerΒ» LAA and single-lobe LAA to avoid damage of the LAA and periauricular area. Conclusions. The research found clinically significant interrelations between the LAA wall thickness and the number of its lobes as well as between the LAA isthmus wall thickness and LAA shape variants
Early-late genes of the ecdysone cascade as models for transcriptional studies
<p>The <i>DHR3</i> and <i>Hr4</i> early-late genes of the ecdysone cascade are described as models for transcriptional studies in <i>Drosophila</i> cells. In a set of experiments, it became clear that these genes are a convenient and versatile system for research into the physiological conditions upon 20-hydroxyecdysone induction. <i>DHR3</i> and <i>Hr4</i> gene transcription is characterized by fast activation kinetics, which enables transcriptional studies without the influence of indirect effects. A limited number of activated genes (only 73 genes are induced one hour after treatment) promote the selectivity of transcriptional studies via 20-hydroxyecdysone induction. <i>DHR3</i> and <i>Hr4</i> gene expression is dose dependent, is completely controlled by the hormone titer and decreases within hours of 20-hydroxyecdysone withdrawal. The <i>DHR3</i> and <i>Hr4</i> gene promoters become functional within 20Β minutes after induction, which makes them useful tools for investigation if the early activation process. Their transcription is controlled by the RNA polymerase II pausing mechanism, which is widespread in the genome of <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i> but is still underinvestigated. Uniform expression activation of the <i>DHR3</i> and <i>Hr4</i> genes in a cell population was confirmed at both the RNA and protein levels. Homogeneity of the transcription response makes DHR3/Hr4 system valuable for investigation of the protein dynamics during transcription induction.</p