Interest of intra-operative 3D imaging in spine surgery: a prospective randomized study

International audienceWe report a single-center, prospective, randomized study for pedicle screw insertion in opened and percutaneous spine surgeries, using a computer-assisted surgery (CAS) technique with three-dimensional (3D) intra-operative images intensifier (without planification on pre-operative CT scan) vs conventional surgical procedure.MATERIAL AND METHOD:We included 143 patients: Group C (conventional, 72 patients) and Group N (3D Fluoronavigation, 71 patients). We measured the pedicle screw running time, and surgeon's radiation exposure. All pedicle runs were assessed according to Heary by two independent radiologists on a post-operative CT scan.RESULTS:3D Fluoronavigation appeared less accurate in percutaneous procedures (24 % of misplaced pedicle screws vs 5 % in Group C) (p = 0.007), but more accurate in opened surgeries (5 % of misplaced pedicle screws vs 17 % in Group C) (p = 0.025). For one vertebra, the average surgical running time reached 8 min in Group C vs 21 min in Group N for percutaneous surgeries (p = 3.42 × 10(-9)), 7.33 min in Group C vs 16.33 min in Group N (p = 2.88 × 10(-7)) for opened surgeries. The 3D navigation device delivered less radiation in percutaneous procedures [0.6 vs 1.62 mSv in Group C (p = 2.45 × 10(-9))]. For opened surgeries, it was twice higher in Group N with 0.21 vs 0.1 mSv in Group C (p = 0.022).CONCLUSION:The rate of misplaced pedicle screws with conventional techniques was nearly the same as most papers and a little bit higher with CAS. Surgical running time and radiation exposure were consistent with many studies. Our work hypothesis is partially confirmed, depending on the type of surgery (opened or closed procedure)

Qualitative and quantitative assessment of cartilage degeneration using full-field optical coherence tomography ex vivo

International audienceThe purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of full-field optical coherence tomography (FFOCT) to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate cartilage degeneration using the qualitative evaluation of histology sections as the reference.DESIGN:Thirty-three human knee cartilage samples of variable degeneration were included in the study. A closely matching histology and FFOCT image was acquired for each sample. The cartilage degeneration was qualitatively evaluated by assigning a grade to each histology and FFOCT image. The relevance of the performed grading was assessed by calculating the intra- and inter-observer reproducibility and calculating the concordance between the histology and FFOCT grades. A near-automatic algorithm was developed to quantitatively characterize the cartilage surface in each image. The correlation between the quantitative results and the reference qualitative histology was calculated.RESULTS:An almost perfect agreement was achieved for both the intra- and inter-reproducibility of the histology and FFOCT qualitative grading (κ ≥ 0.91). A high and statistically significant level of agreement was measured between the histology and FFOCT grades (W = 0.95, P < 0.05). Strong and statistically significant correlations were measured between the quantitative results and the reference qualitative histology grades (ρ ≥ 0.75, P < 0.05).CONCLUSIONS:We have demonstrated that FFOCT is an alternative approach to conventional optical coherence tomography (OCT) that is as well adapted for the qualitative and quantitative assessment of human cartilage as the reference gold standard - histology. This study constitutes the first promising results towards developing a new diagnostic tool in the field of osteoarthritis

Evaluation of the clinical benefit of an electromagnetic navigation system for CT-guided interventional radiology procedures in the thoraco-abdominal region compared with conventional CT guidance (CTNAV II): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

International audienceBACKGROUND: Interventional radiology includes a range of minimally invasive image-guided diagnostic and therapeutic procedures that have become routine clinical practice. Each procedure involves a percutaneous needle insertion, often guided using computed tomography (CT) because of its availability and usability. However, procedures remain complicated, in particular when an obstacle must be avoided, meaning that an oblique trajectory is required. Navigation systems track the operator's instruments, meaning the position and progression of the instruments are visualised in real time on the patient's images. A novel electromagnetic navigation system for CT-guided interventional procedures (IMACTIS-CT®) has been developed, and a previous clinical trial demonstrated improved needle placement accuracy in navigation-assisted procedures. In the present trial, we are evaluating the clinical benefit of the navigation system during the needle insertion step of CT-guided procedures in the thoraco-abdominal region.METHODS/DESIGN: This study is designed as an open, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled interventional clinical trial and is structured as a standard two-arm, parallel-design, individually randomised trial. A maximum of 500 patients will be enrolled. In the experimental arm (navigation system), the procedures are carried out using navigation assistance, and in the active comparator arm (CT), the procedures are carried out with conventional CT guidance. The randomisation is stratified by centre and by the expected difficulty of the procedure. The primary outcome of the trial is a combined criterion to assess the safety (number of serious adverse events), efficacy (number of targets reached) and performance (number of control scans acquired) of navigation-assisted, CT-guided procedures as evaluated by a blinded radiologist and confirmed by an expert committee in case of discordance. The secondary outcomes are (1) the duration of the procedure, (2) the satisfaction of the operator and (3) the irradiation dose delivered, with (4) subgroup analysis according to the expected difficulty of the procedure, as well as an evaluation of (5) the usability of the device.DISCUSSION: This trial addresses the lack of published high-level evidence studies in which navigation-assisted CT-guided interventional procedures are evaluated. This trial is important because it addresses the problems associated with conventional CT guidance and is particularly relevant because the number of interventional radiology procedures carried out in routine clinical practice is increasing.TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01896219 . Registered on 5 July 2013