Training Models in Counseling Psychology: Scientist-Practitioner Versus Practitioner-Scholar

Considerable discussion has occurred through the years regarding models of training. With the recent accreditation of counseling psychology programs espousing the practitioner-scholar model, the importance of reexamining the merits of this as well as the traditional scientist-practitioner is now very important for the future of the field. This article consists of two positions: One pro practitioner-scholar and the other pro scientist-practitioner and con practitioner-scholar. The first position (first part of the article) by Biever, Patterson, and Welch argues for inclusion of the practitioner-scholar model as an alternative for training in counseling psychology. The second position (in the second part of the article) by Stoltenberg, Pace, and Kashubeck reviews concerns with two competing models. These authors conclude that the scientist-practitioner model is a better fit for training in counseling psychology. Recommendations for training within models are presented.Yeshttps://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/manuscript-submission-guideline

Do syllables exist? Psycholinguistic evidence for the retrieval of syllabic units in speech production

Cholin J. Do syllables exist? Psycholinguistic evidence for the retrieval of syllabic units in speech production. In: Cairns CE, Raimy E, eds. Handbook of the Syllable. Brill's Handbooks in Linguistics. Leiden / Boston: Brill Academic Publishers; 2010: 225-253

Aminoglucósidos en las sepsis respiratorias bajas

Se realizó un estudio del uso de antibióticos aminoglucósidos en 70 pacientes con diagnóstico de infección respiratoria baja. Se demostró la poca efectividad de estos antimicrobianos en nuestra investigación. Se efectuó un análisis de los costos de tiempo hospitalario y antibióticos empleados en 50 casos que adquirieron la infección en la comunidad y se comparó con un grupo de 50 pacientes con el mismo diagnóstico tratados con cefazolina. Se obtuvieron resultados significativos en cuanto a la eficacia, disminución de la estadía y costo hospitalarios así como el consumo de antibióticos. En nuestro trabajo se determinó que con el uso de la cefazolina se logró un ahorro considerable de $11 055,98<br>A study on the use of aminoglycoside antibiotics was conducted among 70 patients with diagnosis of low respiratory infection. The low effectiveness of these antimicrobial drugs was proved in this research. It was made an analysis of the hospital stay costs and of the antibiotics used in 50 cases that got infected in the community. It was also made a comparison with a group of 50 patients with the same diagnosis treated with cefazolin. Significant results were obtained concerning efficacy, and the reduction of hospital stay and cost, and of antibiotics consumption. A considerable saving of$ 11 055.98 was attained with the use of cefazoli