Stabilization of helical magnetic structures in thin multilayers

Based on micromagnetic simulations, we report on a novel helical magnetic structure in a soft magnetic film that is sandwiched between and exchange-coupled to two hard magnetic layers. Confined between antiparallel hard magnetic moments, a helix with a turn of 180$^{\circ}$ is stable without the presence of an external magnetic field. The magnetic stability is determined by the energy minimization and is a result of an internal field created by exchange interaction and anisotropy. Since the internal field stores magnetic energy, the helix can serve as an energy-storing element in spin-based nanodevices. Due to the significantly different magnetic resonance frequencies, the ferromagnetic and helical ground states are easy to distinguish in a broadband ferromagnetic resonance experiment.Comment: 4 pages, 3 figure

In situ observations of the atomistic mechanisms of Ni catalyzed low temperature graphene growth.

The key atomistic mechanisms of graphene formation on Ni for technologically relevant hydrocarbon exposures below 600 °C are directly revealed via complementary in situ scanning tunneling microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. For clean Ni(111) below 500 °C, two different surface carbide (Ni2C) conversion mechanisms are dominant which both yield epitaxial graphene, whereas above 500 °C, graphene predominantly grows directly on Ni(111) via replacement mechanisms leading to embedded epitaxial and/or rotated graphene domains. Upon cooling, additional carbon structures form exclusively underneath rotated graphene domains. The dominant graphene growth mechanism also critically depends on the near-surface carbon concentration and hence is intimately linked to the full history of the catalyst and all possible sources of contamination. The detailed XPS fingerprinting of these processes allows a direct link to high pressure XPS measurements of a wide range of growth conditions, including polycrystalline Ni catalysts and recipes commonly used in industrial reactors for graphene and carbon nanotube CVD. This enables an unambiguous and consistent interpretation of prior literature and an assessment of how the quality/structure of as-grown carbon nanostructures relates to the growth modes.L.L.P. acknowledges funding from Area di Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica of Trieste and from MIUR through Progetto Strategico NFFA. C.A. acknowledges support from CNR through the ESF FANAS project NOMCIS. C.A. and C.C. acknowledge financial support from MIUR (PRIN 2010-2011 nº 2010N3T9M4). S.B. acknowledges funding from ICTP TRIL program. S.H. acknowledges funding from ERC grant InsituNANO (n°279342). R.S.W. acknowledges funding from EPSRC (Doctoral training award), and the Nano Science & Technology Doctoral Training Centre Cambridge (NanoDTC). The help of C. Dri and F. Esch (design) and P. Bertoch and F. Salvador (manufacturing) in the realization of the high temperature STM sample holder is gratefully acknowledged. We acknowledge the Helmholtz-Zentrum-Berlin Electron storage ring BESSY II for provision of synchrotron radiation at the ISISS beamline and we thank the BESSY staff for continuous support of our experiments.This is the accepted manuscript. The final version is available from ACS at http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/nn402927q

Edge-Catalyst Wetting and Orientation Control of Graphene Growth by Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth

Three key positions of graphene on a catalyst surface can be identified based on precise computations, namely as sunk (S), step-attached (SA), and on-terrace (OT). Surprisingly, the preferred modes are not all alike but vary from metal to metal, depending on the energies of graphene-edge "wetting" by the catalyst: on a catalyst surface of soft metal like Au(111), Cu(111) or Pd(111), the graphene tends to grow in step-attached or embedded mode, while on a rigid catalyst surface such as Pt(111), Ni(111), Rh(111), Ir(111), or Ru(0001), graphene prefers growing as step-attached or on-terrace. Accordingly, as further energy analysis shows, the graphene formed via the S and SA modes should have orientations fixed relative to the metal crystal lattice, thus prescribing epitaxial growth of graphene on Au(111), Cu(111) and Pd(111). This conclusion indeed correlates well with numerous experimental data, also solving some puzzles observed, and suggesting better ways for growing larger-area single-crystalline graphene by making proper catalyst selections