Health care providers' perceptions of the vulnerability of persons with disabilities: Sociological frameworks and empirical analyses

In this study, we explored health care providers' perceptions about their professional responsibility for persons with disabilities. We examined the providers' perceptions of the vulnerability of persons with disabilities to sexual exploitation. We also elicited the professionals' assumptions about the consequences of such exploitation to the persons with disability and the professionals working with them. Our analyses indicated that these professionals perceived that different categories of disability pose different risk of sexual exploitation. Populations with forms of cognitive impairment were considered most vulnerable. In terms of professional responsibility for the care of persons who might have experienced sexual exploitation, respondents reported least confidence in their ability to detect instances of exploitation. In contrast, respondents expressed greater confidence in their ability to report and conduct follow-up of abuse. The professionals anticipated providing emotional support to persons who experienced exploitation. We discuss the study's implications for training and policy formation.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45566/1/11195_2005_Article_BF01102394.pd

Effectiveness of a national quality improvement programme to improve survival after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH): a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial

Background: Emergency abdominal surgery is associated with poor patient outcomes. We studied the effectiveness of a national quality improvement (QI) programme to implement a care pathway to improve survival for these patients. Methods: We did a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial of patients aged 40 years or older undergoing emergency open major abdominal surgery. Eligible UK National Health Service (NHS) hospitals (those that had an emergency general surgical service, a substantial volume of emergency abdominal surgery cases, and contributed data to the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit) were organised into 15 geographical clusters and commenced the QI programme in a random order, based on a computer-generated random sequence, over an 85-week period with one geographical cluster commencing the intervention every 5 weeks from the second to the 16th time period. Patients were masked to the study group, but it was not possible to mask hospital staff or investigators. The primary outcome measure was mortality within 90 days of surgery. Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN80682973. Findings: Treatment took place between March 3, 2014, and Oct 19, 2015. 22 754 patients were assessed for elegibility. Of 15 873 eligible patients from 93 NHS hospitals, primary outcome data were analysed for 8482 patients in the usual care group and 7374 in the QI group. Eight patients in the usual care group and nine patients in the QI group were not included in the analysis because of missing primary outcome data. The primary outcome of 90-day mortality occurred in 1210 (16%) patients in the QI group compared with 1393 (16%) patients in the usual care group (HR 1·11, 0·96–1·28). Interpretation: No survival benefit was observed from this QI programme to implement a care pathway for patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. Future QI programmes should ensure that teams have both the time and resources needed to improve patient care. Funding: National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research Programme

Effectiveness of a national quality improvement programme to improve survival after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH): a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial

BACKGROUND: Emergency abdominal surgery is associated with poor patient outcomes. We studied the effectiveness of a national quality improvement (QI) programme to implement a care pathway to improve survival for these patients. METHODS: We did a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial of patients aged 40 years or older undergoing emergency open major abdominal surgery. Eligible UK National Health Service (NHS) hospitals (those that had an emergency general surgical service, a substantial volume of emergency abdominal surgery cases, and contributed data to the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit) were organised into 15 geographical clusters and commenced the QI programme in a random order, based on a computer-generated random sequence, over an 85-week period with one geographical cluster commencing the intervention every 5 weeks from the second to the 16th time period. Patients were masked to the study group, but it was not possible to mask hospital staff or investigators. The primary outcome measure was mortality within 90 days of surgery. Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN80682973. FINDINGS: Treatment took place between March 3, 2014, and Oct 19, 2015. 22 754 patients were assessed for elegibility. Of 15 873 eligible patients from 93 NHS hospitals, primary outcome data were analysed for 8482 patients in the usual care group and 7374 in the QI group. Eight patients in the usual care group and nine patients in the QI group were not included in the analysis because of missing primary outcome data. The primary outcome of 90-day mortality occurred in 1210 (16%) patients in the QI group compared with 1393 (16%) patients in the usual care group (HR 1·11, 0·96-1·28). INTERPRETATION: No survival benefit was observed from this QI programme to implement a care pathway for patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. Future QI programmes should ensure that teams have both the time and resources needed to improve patient care. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research Programme

The Age of Louis XIV : A History of European Civilization in the Period of Pascal . Molière, Cromwell,, Milton, Peter the Great, Newton, and Spinoza :

X, 802 tr.; 24 cm

The Age of Voltairel Heritage : A History of Civilization in Western Europe from 1715 to 1756, with Special Emphasis on the Conflict Between Religion

X, 898 tr.; 24 cm

Rousseau and Revolution : A History of Civilization in France, England, and Germany from 1756 and in the Remainder of Europe from 1715, to 1789

XX, 1091 tr.; 24 cm

The Age of Napoleon : A History of European Civilization from 1789 to 1815

XX, 872 tr.; 24 cm

The Age of Reason Begins : A History of European Civilization in the Period of Shakespeare . Bacon, Montaigne, Rembrandt, Galileo, and Descartes : 1558

X, 729 tr.; 24 cm

The age of faith

xviii, 1196 p.; 25 cm

The story of philosophy: the lives and opinions of the greater philosophers

One leaf inserted between p. xii and xiii.Plato.--Aristotle and Greek science.--Francis Bacon.--Spinoza.--Voltaire and the French enlightenment.--Immanuel Kant and German idealism.--Schopenhauer.--Herbert Spencer.--Friedrich Nietzsche.--Contemporary European philosophers.--Contemporary American philosophers.Mode of access: Internet