5 research outputs found

    Differences in terms of presentation and outcomes between patients with lung cancer as opposed to other solid organ cancer after infection with SARS-CoV-2: protocol for a systematic review

    No full text
    Introduction Scholars believe that COVID-19 can be particularly lethal for patients with cancer. Some studies found that COVID-19 appears to be more lethal in patients with lung cancer than in other cancer patients. In order to take appropriate measures to balance a delay in lung cancer treatment against the risk for a potential COVID-19 exposure, we first need to know whether patients with lung cancer have special risks. We aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine differences in terms of presentation and outcomes between patients with lung cancer as opposed to other solid organ cancer after infection with SARS-CoV-2.Methods and analysis A comprehensive search of published original research studies will be performed in Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, WangFangData, CQVIP, COMPENDEX and CNKI. The medRxiv preprint server will also be searched for applicable studies (grey literature). Original research studies will be included if they include patients with: (A) laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and (B) confirmed solid cancer, and (C) measurable clinical presentation or outcome, such as mortality rate, intensive care unit admission rate, incidence of pneumonia. One author will conduct the electronic database searches, two authors will independently screen studies, two will extract data and two will assess study quality. If I² exceeds 60% for the pooled analysis, we will explore sources of heterogeneity in subgroups of studies. We will use fixed-effect, random-effects or mixed-effects models to estimate the relative risk or OR. If the data reporting allows, a subgroup analysis between non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer patients will be performed.Ethics and dissemination The proposed study will not collect individual-level data and, therefore, does not require ethical approval. We will submit our findings to a peer-reviewed scientific journal and will disseminate results through presentations at international scientific conferences.PROSPERO registration number CRD42020190118

    In vivo

    No full text

    Association of COMT Polymorphisms with Multiple Physical Activity-Related Injuries among University Students in China

    No full text
    The catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) is a candidate gene to provide promising evidence of psychiatric disorders, but there is a knowledge gap between the genetic factor and multiple physical activity-related injuries (PARIs). The aim of this study was to explore the contribution of COMT to the risk of PARIs among university students in the Chinese Han population. We can further search for the intrinsic risk factors for the occurrence of multiple physical activity injuries and provide a scientific basis for early screening and precise intervention for the high-risk group of college students with multiple PARIs. A 1:1 matched case-control study of 61 PARIs cases and 61 healthy controls were carried out. DNA samples of the participants were isolated from saliva and genotyped on eight SNPs of the COMT gene (rs9265, rs4680, rs6269, rs4818, rs4633, rs165655, rs165656, and rs165722) using the MALDI-TOF MS method. We found that rs6269 and rs4818 were significantly associated with PARIs, and rs6269-GG and rs4818-GG contributed to the reduced risk of PARIs. Further haplotype analysis showed a four-marker C-G-C-G haplotype (rs165722-rs6269-rs4633-rs4818) acted with a protective role in the development of PARIs (p = 0.037; OR: 0.474, 95% CI: 0.269 to 0.834). However, the interactions between club membership and rs6269 or rs4818 would significantly increase the risk of PARIs (both p < 0.001, OR: 5.121 and 4.977, respectively). This is the first study to find the contribution of COMT to PARIs occurrence, suggesting that the COMT polymorphisms and the gene–environment interactions may alter the risk of PARIs

    Development and in vitro evaluation of deacety mycoepoxydiene nanosuspension

    No full text
    National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2009CB930300]; Major scientific and technological specialized project for Significant New Formulation of New Drugs [2009ZX09502-001]Deacety mycoepoxydiene (DM), extracted from Phomopsis sp. A123 of thalassiomycetes, is a novel and potent anti-cancer agent. Due to its physicochemical characteristics, the drug, a poorly water-soluble weak acid, shows poor solubility and dissolution characteristics. To improve the solubility and dissolution, formulation of DM as nanosuspension has been performed in this study. Nanosuspensions were developed by high-pressure homogenization (HPH) (DissoCubes (R) Technology) and transformed into dry powder by freeze-drying. The nanosuspension produced was then investigated using optical microscope, photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS), zeta potential measurement, SEM, TEM, AFM, DSC and XRD. To verify the theoretical hypothesis on the benefit of increased surface area, in vitro saturation solubility and dissolution profile were investigated. In addition, the in vitro cell cytotoxicity was examined. Results showed that a narrow size distributed nanosuspension composed of unchanged crystalline state with a mean particle size of 515 +/- 18 nm, a polydispersity index of 0.12 +/- 0.03 and a zeta potential of -23.1 +/- 3.5 mV was obtained. In the in vitro dissolution test an accelerated dissolution velocity and increased saturation solubility could be shown for the MD nanosuspension. The in vitro cytotoxicity experiments provided evidence for an enhanced efficacy of the DM nanosuspension formulation compared to free DM solution. Taken together, these results illustrate the opportunity to formulate DM in nanosuspension form as an anti-prostate cancer delivery system. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V
    corecore