11 research outputs found
Key ethical issues discussed at CDC-sponsored international, regional meetings to explore cultural perspectives and contexts on pandemic influenza preparedness and response
Background: Recognizing the importance of having a broad exploration of how cultural perspectives may shape thinking about ethical considerations, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funded four regional meetings in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Eastern Mediterranean to explore these perspectives relevant to pandemic influenza preparedness and response. The meetings were attended by 168 health professionals, scientists, academics, ethicists, religious leaders, and other community members representing 40 countries in these regions.
Methods: We reviewed the meeting reports, notes and stories and mapped outcomes to the key ethical challenges for pandemic influenza response described in the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) guidance, Ethical Considerations in Developing a Public Health Response to Pandemic Influenza: transparency and public engagement, allocation of resources, social distancing, obligations to and of healthcare workers, and international collaboration.
Results: The important role of transparency and public engagement were widely accepted among participants. However, there was general agreement that no “one size fits all” approach to allocating resources can address the variety of economic, cultural and other contextual factors that must be taken into account. The importance of social distancing as a tool to limit disease transmission was also recognized, but the difficulties associated with this measure were acknowledged. There was agreement that healthcare workers often have competing obligations and that government has a responsibility to assist healthcare workers in doing their job by providing appropriate training and equipment. Finally, there was agreement about the importance of international collaboration for combating global health threats.
Conclusion: Although some cultural differences in the values that frame pandemic preparedness and response efforts were observed, participants generally agreed on the key ethical principles discussed in the WHO’s guidance. Most significantly the input gathered from these regional meetings pointed to the important role that procedural ethics can play in bringing people and countries together to respond to the shared health threat posed by a pandemic influenza despite the existence of cultural differences
Key Ethical Issues Discussed at CDC-Sponsored International, Regional Meetings to Explore Cultural Perspectives and Contexts on Pandemic Influenza Preparedness and Response
Background: Recognizing the importance of having a broad exploration of how cultural perspectives may shape
thinking about ethical considerations, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funded four regional
meetings in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Eastern Mediterranean to explore these perspectives relevant to
pandemic influenza preparedness and response. The meetings were attended by 168 health professionals, scientists,
academics, ethicists, religious leaders, and other community members representing 40 countries in these regions.
Methods: We reviewed the meeting reports, notes and stories and mapped outcomes to the key ethical challenges for
pandemic influenza response described in the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) guidance, Ethical Considerations
in Developing a Public Health Response to Pandemic Influenza: transparency and public engagement, allocation of
resources, social distancing, obligations to and of healthcare workers, and international collaboration.
Results: The important role of transparency and public engagement were widely accepted among participants.
However, there was general agreement that no “one size fits all” approach to allocating resources can address the variety
of economic, cultural and other contextual factors that must be taken into account. The importance of social distancing
as a tool to limit disease transmission was also recognized, but the difficulties associated with this measure were
acknowledged. There was agreement that healthcare workers often have competing obligations and that government
has a responsibility to assist healthcare workers in doing their job by providing appropriate training and equipment.
Finally, there was agreement about the importance of international collaboration for combating global health threats.
Conclusion: Although some cultural differences in the values that frame pandemic preparedness and response efforts
were observed, participants generally agreed on the key ethical principles discussed in the WHO’s guidance. Most
significantly the input gathered from these regional meetings pointed to the important role that procedural ethics can
play in bringing people and countries together to respond to the shared health threat posed by a pandemic influenza
despite the existence of cultural differences
Ethical Guidelines in Pandemic Influenza: Recommendations of the Ethics Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee of the Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Key Ethical Issues Discussed at CDC-Sponsored International, Regional Meetings to Explore Cultural Perspectives and Contexts on Pandemic Influenza Preparedness and Response
Background
Recognizing the importance of having a broad exploration of how cultural perspectives may shape thinking about ethical considerations, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funded four regional meetings in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Eastern Mediterranean to explore these perspectives relevant to pandemic influenza preparedness and response. The meetings were attended by 168 health professionals, scientists, academics, ethicists, religious leaders, and other community members representing 40 countries in these regions.
Methods
We reviewed the meeting reports, notes and stories and mapped outcomes to the key ethical challenges for pandemic influenza response described in the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) guidance, Ethical Considerations in Developing a Public Health Response to Pandemic Influenza: transparency and public engagement, allocation of resources, social distancing, obligations to and of healthcare workers, and international collaboration.
Results
The important role of transparency and public engagement were widely accepted among participants. However, there was general agreement that no “one size fits all” approach to allocating resources can address the variety of economic, cultural and other contextual factors that must be taken into account. The importance of social distancing as a tool to limit disease transmission was also recognized, but the difficulties associated with this measure were acknowledged. There was agreement that healthcare workers often have competing obligations and that government has a responsibility to assist healthcare workers in doing their job by providing appropriate training and equipment. Finally, there was agreement about the importance of international collaboration for combating global health threats.
Conclusion
Although some cultural differences in the values that frame pandemic preparedness and response efforts were observed, participants generally agreed on the key ethical principles discussed in the WHO’s guidance. Most significantly the input gathered from these regional meetings pointed to the important role that procedural ethics can play in bringing people and countries together to respond to the shared health threat posed by a pandemic influenza despite the existence of cultural differences
Radio network deployment and interference mitigation methodologies for 2-11 GHz broadband wireless access
EThOS - Electronic Theses Online ServiceGBUnited Kingdo
Combat exposure and adult psychosocial adjustment among U.S. Army veterans serving in Vietnam, 1965–1971.
Chronic multisymptom illness affecting Air Force veterans of the Gulf War
Context. - Gulf War (GW) veterans report nonspecific symptoms significantly more often than their nondeployed peers. However, no specific disorder has been identified, and the etiologic basis and clinical significance of their symptoms remain unclear. Objectives. - To organize symptoms reported by US Air Force GW veterans to a case definition, to characterize clinical features, and to evaluate risk factors. Design. - Cross-sectional population survey of individual characteristics and symptoms and clinical evaluation (including a structured interview, the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36, psychiatric screening, physical examination, clinical laboratory tests, and serologic assays for antibodies against viruses, rickettsia, parasites, and bacteria) conducted in 1995. Participants and Setting. - The cross-sectional questionnaire survey included 3723 currently active volunteers, irrespective of health status or GW participation, from 4 air force populations. The cross-sectional clinical evaluation included 158 GW veterans from one unit, irrespective of health status. Main Outcome Measures. - Symptom-based case definition; case prevalence rate for GW veterans and nondeployed personnel; clinical and laboratory findings among veterans who met the case definition. Results. - We defined a case as having 1 or more chronic symptoms from at least 2 of 3 categories (fatigue, mood-cognition, and musculoskeletal). The prevalence of mild-to-moderate and severe cases was 39% and 6%, rsepectively, among 1155 GW veterans compared with 14% and 0.7% among 2520 nondeployed personnel. Illness was not associated with time or place of deployment or with duties during the war. Fifty-nine clinically evaluated GW veterans (37%) were noncases, 86 (54%) mild-to-moderate cases, and 13 (8%) severe cases. Although no physical examination, laboratory, or serologic findings identified cases, veterans who met the case definition had significantly diminished functioning and well- being. Conclusions. - Among currently active members of 4 Air Force populations, a chronic multisymptom condition was significantly associated with deployment to the GW. The condition was not associated with specific GW exposures and also affected nondeployed personnel.Link_to_subscribed_fulltex