Die Etablierung eines DNA-Bank-Netzwerkes in Deutschland

DNA-Banken sind technisch optimierte Serviceeinrichtungen zur dauerhaften Lagerung gut dokumentierter DNA. Sie ermöglichen einen allgemeinen Zugang zur DNA und ihrer gesamten Dokumentation zur Verifikation von Forschungsergebnissen oder um weiterführende Untersuchungen am gleichen Ausgangsmaterial durchführen zu können. Vier deutsche Sammlungsinstitutionen mit sich ergänzender Fachexpertise haben sich mit Hilfe der DFG zusammengeschlossen, um ein DNA-Bank- Netzwerk als Serviceeinrichtung für die naturwissenschaftliche Forschung zu etablieren. Bisher gibt es keine allgemein akzeptierten Standards für den Betrieb von biologischen DNA-Banken. Aus diesem Grunde wird hier der momentane Stand des Wissens bezüglich der i) Empfehlung für die Aufsammlung von Pflanzenmaterial, ii) DNA-Extraktion und Aufreinigung, iii) Ermittlung der DNA-Qualität,- Reinheit und -Konzentration, iv) der Langzeitlagerung sowie v) der Dokumentation und Datenbankstrukturen zusammengefasst. Im Rahmen der praktischen Umsetzung wird die Homepage des DNA-Bank-Netzwerkes (www.dnabanknetwork. org) sowie die Möglichkeiten der Bestellung und Einlagerung von DNA-Proben vorgestellt und es wird auf die Ziele des Projektes eingegangen.DNA banks are technically optimized service facilities for the long term storage of well documented DNA. They allow for universal accessibility to DNA with its full documentation for verification of scientific analysis or to undertake complementary or corroborative studies on the source material. Four German natural history institutions with complementary scientific expertise are supported by the DFG to establish a DNA Bank Network as service facility for the life sciences. Up to now, no common standards for the management of DNA banks have been developed. Therefore, the state of the art is presented here concerning i) collection of plant material, ii) DNA extraction and purification iii) DNA quality, purity and concentration, iv) long term storage and v) documentation and database structures. As part of the public perfomance the homepage of the DNA Bank Network (www.dnabank-network.org) as well as the possibilities to order or donate DNA are presented and future goals are envisaged

Meeting Report: GBIF hackathon-workshop on Darwin Core and sample data (22-24 May 2013)

This is the published version, also available at http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.4898640.The workshop-hackathon was convened by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) at its secretariat in Copenhagen over 22-24 May 2013 with additional support from several projects (RCN4GSC, EAGER, VertNet, BiSciCol, GGBN, and Micro B3). It assembled a team of experts to address the challenge of adapting the Darwin Core standard for a wide variety of sample data. Topics addressed in the workshop included 1) a review of outstanding issues in the Darwin Core standard, 2) issues relating to publishing of biodiversity data through Darwin Core Archives, 3) use of Darwin Core Archives for publishing sample and monitoring data, 4) the case for modifying the Darwin Core Text Guide specification to support many-to-many relations, and 5) the generalization of the Darwin Core Archive to a “Biodiversity Data Archive”. A wide variety of use cases were assembled and discussed in order to inform further developments

Meeting Report: GBIF hackathon-workshop on Darwin Core and sample data (22-24 May 2013)

This is the published version, also available at http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.4898640.The workshop-hackathon was convened by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) at its secretariat in Copenhagen over 22-24 May 2013 with additional support from several projects (RCN4GSC, EAGER, VertNet, BiSciCol, GGBN, and Micro B3). It assembled a team of experts to address the challenge of adapting the Darwin Core standard for a wide variety of sample data. Topics addressed in the workshop included 1) a review of outstanding issues in the Darwin Core standard, 2) issues relating to publishing of biodiversity data through Darwin Core Archives, 3) use of Darwin Core Archives for publishing sample and monitoring data, 4) the case for modifying the Darwin Core Text Guide specification to support many-to-many relations, and 5) the generalization of the Darwin Core Archive to a “Biodiversity Data Archive”. A wide variety of use cases were assembled and discussed in order to inform further developments

Meeting Report: GBIF hackathon-workshop on Darwin Core and sample data (22-24 May 2013)

This is the published version, also available at http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.4898640.The workshop-hackathon was convened by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) at its secretariat in Copenhagen over 22-24 May 2013 with additional support from several projects (RCN4GSC, EAGER, VertNet, BiSciCol, GGBN, and Micro B3). It assembled a team of experts to address the challenge of adapting the Darwin Core standard for a wide variety of sample data. Topics addressed in the workshop included 1) a review of outstanding issues in the Darwin Core standard, 2) issues relating to publishing of biodiversity data through Darwin Core Archives, 3) use of Darwin Core Archives for publishing sample and monitoring data, 4) the case for modifying the Darwin Core Text Guide specification to support many-to-many relations, and 5) the generalization of the Darwin Core Archive to a “Biodiversity Data Archive”. A wide variety of use cases were assembled and discussed in order to inform further developments

Meeting Report: GBIF hackathon-workshop on Darwin Core and sample data (22-24 May 2013)

This is the published version, also available at http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.4898640.The workshop-hackathon was convened by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) at its secretariat in Copenhagen over 22-24 May 2013 with additional support from several projects (RCN4GSC, EAGER, VertNet, BiSciCol, GGBN, and Micro B3). It assembled a team of experts to address the challenge of adapting the Darwin Core standard for a wide variety of sample data. Topics addressed in the workshop included 1) a review of outstanding issues in the Darwin Core standard, 2) issues relating to publishing of biodiversity data through Darwin Core Archives, 3) use of Darwin Core Archives for publishing sample and monitoring data, 4) the case for modifying the Darwin Core Text Guide specification to support many-to-many relations, and 5) the generalization of the Darwin Core Archive to a “Biodiversity Data Archive”. A wide variety of use cases were assembled and discussed in order to inform further developments

Meeting Report: GBIF hackathon-workshop on Darwin Core and sample data (22-24 May 2013)

This is the published version, also available at http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.4898640.The workshop-hackathon was convened by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) at its secretariat in Copenhagen over 22-24 May 2013 with additional support from several projects (RCN4GSC, EAGER, VertNet, BiSciCol, GGBN, and Micro B3). It assembled a team of experts to address the challenge of adapting the Darwin Core standard for a wide variety of sample data. Topics addressed in the workshop included 1) a review of outstanding issues in the Darwin Core standard, 2) issues relating to publishing of biodiversity data through Darwin Core Archives, 3) use of Darwin Core Archives for publishing sample and monitoring data, 4) the case for modifying the Darwin Core Text Guide specification to support many-to-many relations, and 5) the generalization of the Darwin Core Archive to a “Biodiversity Data Archive”. A wide variety of use cases were assembled and discussed in order to inform further developments

Rehabilitative Versorgung und gesundheitsbedingte Frühberentung von Personen mit Migrationshintergrund in Deutschland: Abschlussbericht

Dieser Abschlussbericht stellt die Ergebnisse des Projektes "Rehabilitative Versorgung und gesundheitsbedingte Frühberentung von Personen mit Migrationshintergrund in Deutschland" vor. Auf Basis eines quantitativen und qualitativen Forschungszugangs wurde untersucht, inwiefern sich einzelne Gruppen von ausländischen Staatsangehörigen bzw. Menschen mit Migrationshintergrund hinsichtlich der Häufigkeit von Arbeitsunfällen und Berufskrankheiten, der Inanspruchnahme beruflicher und medizinischer Rehabilitationsmaßnahmen, des Rehabilitationserfolges und der Frühberentung von Deutschen bzw. Menschen ohne Migrationshintergrund unterscheiden. Unter Bezugnahme auf Prozess- und Individualdaten unterschiedlicher Rehabilitationsträger zeigt der Bericht, dass Menschen mit Migrationshintergrund im Durchschnitt weniger häufig Maßnahmen der medizinischen Rehabilitation in Anspruch nehmen sowie einen geringeren Rehabilitationserfolg und höhere Frühberentungsquoten aufweisen als die Mehrheitsbevölkerung. Auf Basis einer systematischen Literaturrecherche und mittels qualitativer Experten- und Fokusgruppeninterviews werden darüber hinaus unterschiedliche Zugangs-, Durchführungs- und Wirksamkeitsbarrieren in der Rehabilitation von Menschen mit Migrationshintergrund identifiziert, welche die quantitativen Ergebnisse zumindest teilweise erklären können. Handlungsempfehlungen für die Verbesserung der rehabilitativen Versorgung von Menschen mit Migrationshintergrund werden abgeleitet

Plant and fungal collections: Current status, future perspectives

Societal Impact Statement Plant and fungal specimens provide the auditable evidence that a particular organism occurred at a particular place, and at a particular point in time, verifying past occurrence and distribution. They also document the aspects of human exploration and culture. Collectively specimens form a global asset with significant potential for new uses to help address societal and environmental challenges. Collections also serve as a platform to engage and educate a broad range of stakeholders from the academic to the public, strengthening engagement and understanding of plant and fungal diversity—the basis of life on Earth. Summary We provide a global review of the current state of plant and fungal collections including herbaria and fungaria, botanic gardens, fungal culture collections, and biobanks. The review focuses on the numbers of collections, major taxonomic group and species level coverage, geographical representation and the extent to which the data from collections are digitally accessible. We identify the major gaps in these collections and in digital data. We also consider what collection types need to be further developed to support research, such as environmental DNA and cryopreservation of desiccation-sensitive seeds. Around 31% of vascular plant species are represented in botanic gardens, and 17% of known fungal species are held in culture collections, both these living collections showing a bias toward northern temperate taxa. Only 21% of preserved collections are available via the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) with Asia, central and north Africa and Amazonia being relatively under-represented. Supporting long-term collection facilities in biodiverse areas should be considered by governmental and international aid agencies, in addition to short-term project funding. Institutions should consider how best to speed up digitization of collections and to disseminate all data via aggregators such as GBIF, which will greatly facilitate use, research, and community curation to improve quality. There needs to be greater alignment between biodiversity informatics initiatives and standards to allow more comprehensive analysis of collections data and to facilitate linkage of extended information, facilitating broader use. Much can be achieved with greater coordination through existing initiatives and strengthening relationships with users

Rehabilitative Versorgung und gesundheitliche Frühberentung von Personen mit Migrationshintergrund in Deutschland. Forschungsbericht Nr. 402

Brzoska P, Voigtländer S, Reutin B, et al. Rehabilitative Versorgung und gesundheitliche Frühberentung von Personen mit Migrationshintergrund in Deutschland. Forschungsbericht Nr. 402. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales; 2010