8 research outputs found

    Treatment of complex anterior cerebral artery aneurysms with Pipeline flow diversion: mid-term results

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: The off-label use of flow diverters in the treatment of distal aneurysms continues to be debated. OBJECTIVE: To report our multicenter experience in the treatment of complex anterior cerebral artery aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device (PED). METHODS: The neurointerventional databases of the four participating institutions were retrospectively reviewed for aneurysms treated with PED between October 2011 and January of 2016. All patients treated for anterior cerebral artery aneurysms were included in the analysis. Clinical presentation, location, type, vessel size, procedural complications, clinical and imaging follow-up were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Twenty patients (13 female) with 20 aneurysms met the inclusion criteria in our study. Fifteen aneurysms were classified as saccular and five as fusiform (mean size 7.3 mm). Thirteen aneurysms were located in the anterior communicating region (ACOM or A1/2 junction), six were A2-pericallosal, and one was located in the A1 segment. Six patients had presented previously with subarachnoid hemorrhage and had their aneurysms initially clipped or coiled. There was one minor event (a small caudate infarct) and one major event (intraparenchymal hemorrhage). Sixteen of the 20 patients had angiographic follow-up (mean 10 months). Eleven aneurysms were completely occluded, one had residual neck, and four had residual aneurysm filling. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of complex anterior cerebral artery aneurysms with the PED as an alternative for patients who are not good candidates for conventional methods is technically feasible and safe. Mid-term results are promising but larger series with long-term follow-up are required to assess its effectiveness

    Endovascular Thrombectomy Versus Medical Therapy Alone in Patients With Large Core Based on Computed Tomography Perfusion

    No full text
    Background Patients presenting with large vessel occlusion and a large ischemic core (>50 mL) have been consistently undersampled in the major endovascular thrombectomy (ET) trials. As such, equipoise exists as to whether ET is associated with improved outcomes over medical therapy alone in this population. Methods Prospectively collected databases from 4 US centers were reviewed to identify patients with baseline ischemic cores >50 mL based on computed tomography perfusion imaging using RAPID software (iSchemaView), who were treated with ET or medical therapy alone between January 2014 and October 2019. Baseline characteristics, procedural information, and clinical follow‐up data were collected. A matched‐control comparison of these patients was performed. Results A total of 167 patients were included, of whom 92 received medical therapy alone and 75 underwent ET. Seventy‐five pairs were obtained after matching for baseline ischemic core volume, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, and age. Rate of 90‐day good outcome was significantly higher in the ET arm (28.4% versus 4.9%, P=0.002). In univariate analysis of ET patients, the rate of good outcome was significantly higher among patients treated within <6 hours compared with ≥6 hours (44.2% versus 17.4%, P=0.02). Predictors of good outcome included age (P=0.008), ischemic core volume (P=0.01), and time from last known well to groin puncture (P=0.004). Conclusions ET was associated with improved outcomes in patients with large ischemic core based on computed tomography perfusion. This association was more pronounced in patients who present early (<6 hours from last seen well) with an adequate target mismatch. These results may guide the practice until data from ongoing randomized trials become available
    corecore