The differential impact of a 6-versus 12-month pharmacist-led interprofessional medication adherence program on medication adherence in patients with diabetic kidney disease: the randomized PANDIA-IRIS study

Background: For every 100 patients with diabetes, 40 will develop diabetic kidney disease (DKD) over time. This diabetes complication may be partly due to poor adherence to their prescribed medications. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the differential impact of a 6- versus 12-month pharmacist-led interprofessional medication adherence program (IMAP) on the components of adherence (i.e., implementation and discontinuation) in patients with DKD, during and after the intervention.Methods: All included patients benefited from the IMAP, which consists in face-to-face regular motivational interviews between the patient and the pharmacist based on the adherence feedback from electronic monitors (EMs), in which the prescribed treatments were delivered. Adherence reports were available to prescribers during the intervention period. Patients were randomized 1:1 into two parallel arms: a 12-month IMAP intervention in group A versus a 6-month intervention in group B. Adherence was monitored continuously for 24 months post-inclusion during the consecutive intervention and follow-up phases. In the follow-up phase post-intervention, EM data were blinded. Blood pressure was measured by the pharmacist at each visit. The repeated measures of daily patient medication intake outcomes (1/0) to antidiabetics, antihypertensive drugs, and statins were modeled longitudinally using the generalized estimated equation in both groups and in both the intervention and the follow-up phases.Results: EM data of 72 patients were analyzed (34 in group A and 38 in group B). Patient implementation to antidiabetics and antihypertensive drugs increased during the IMAP intervention phase and decreased progressively during the follow-up period. At 12 months, implementation to antidiabetics was statistically higher in group A versus group B (93.8% versus 86.8%; Δ 7.0%, 95% CI: 5.7%; 8.3%); implementation to antihypertensive drugs was also higher in group A versus B (97.9% versus 92.1%; Δ 5.8%, 95% CI: 4.8%; 6.7%). At 24 months, implementation to antidiabetics and antihypertensive drugs remained higher in group A versus B (for antidiabetics: 88.6% versus 85.6%; Δ 3.0%, 95% CI: 1.7%; 4.4% and for antihypertensive drugs: 94.4% versus 85.9%; Δ 8.5%, 95% CI: 6.6%; 10.7%). No difference in pharmacy-based blood pressure was observed between groups. Implementation to statins was comparable at each time point between groups. Three patients discontinued at least one treatment; they were all in group B. In total, 46% (16/35) of patients in the 12-month intervention versus 37% (14/38) of patients in the 6-month intervention left the study during the intervention phase, mainly due to personal reasons.Conclusion: The IMAP improves adherence to chronic medications in patients with DKD. The longer the patients benefit from the intervention, the more the implementation increases over time, and the more the effect lasts after the end of the intervention. These data suggest that a 12-month rather than a 6-month program should be provided as a standard of care to support medication adherence in this population. The impact on clinical outcomes needs to be demonstrated.Clinical Trial Registration:Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04190251_PANDIA IRIS

Adhésion thérapeutique et collaboration médecin-pharmacien. L’exemple du patient avec néphropathie diabétique

Polypharmacy is common in patients with a chronic disease. It is appropriate when both the patient and the physician discuss the goal of each prescribed medication with a motivated patient capable of managing his/her medication. It can however be inappropriate when treatment becomes too complex for the frail patient. The risk is non-adherence to therapy, which often results in an intensification of treatment due to unmet therapeutic goals. Collaboration between physicians and pharmacists is therefore essential for the educational support of patients with polypharmacy. In this article, we review the studies examining the impact of a physician-pharmacist collaboration on the medication adherence of diabetic patients with renal impairment.La polypharmacie concerne de nombreux patients avec une maladie chronique. Elle est appropriée lorsque chaque médicament a été prescrit dans un but thérapeutique spécifique discuté avec un patient motivé et capable de gérer ses médicaments. Elle peut cependant être inappropriée lorsque le traitement devient trop complexe pour une personne fragile. Le risque est une non-adhésion au traitement, dont découle souvent une intensification de la thérapie en raison d’objectifs thérapeutiques non atteints. La collaboration médecin-pharmacien est donc primordiale pour l’accompagnement éducatif du patient complexe dans la gestion de ses médicaments. Dans cet article, nous revoyons les études examinant l’adhésion thérapeutique chez le patient diabétique avec une atteinte rénale lors d’une collaboration médecin-pharmacien

Rivaroxaban and medication adherence – A cohort study (RIVA): Qualitative results

Introduction: Rivaroxaban, a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), does not involve laboratory monitoring. This would seem to be an advantage for patients, but there are also disadvantages. The understanding of patients’ perceptions and experiences in DOACs self-management for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is missing. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore patients’ perceptions of and experiences with rivaroxaban for DVT in a real-world clinical setting. Material and methods: In depth, individual, face-to-face, interviews were performed. An interview guide was developed and used to perform the interviews. The collected data were analyzed using a qualitative content analysis. Results: Thirty-one patients agreed to participate. The analysis highlighted 9 main themes, and 3 of them were cited by all 31 patients: a) integration of the treatment into patients’ lives (easy integration, medication intake associated with a meal, some flexibility with regard to rivaroxaban intake schedule, taking rivaroxaban twice a day vs. once a day, and intentional nonadherence for two patients), b) treatment’s perception (no alternative choice to taking the treatment), positive aspects, such as treatment efficacy and small tablet size, and acceptable treatment duration, c) understanding (the risks associated with the disease and treatment), questioning the treatment, and needing information (about side effects, interactions, risks and risk management). Conclusions: The integration of rivaroxaban into patients’ lives was easy, and the overall impression about the medication was positive. Although patients said they had received sufficient information by healthcare professionals, some patients mentioned doubts and unresolved questions

Néphropathie diabétique : soutenir l’adhésion médicamenteuse de façon interprofessionnelle

La non-adhésion médicamenteuse chez les patient-es avec une néphropathie diabétique (ND) est endémique. L’étude PANDIA- IRIS, implémentée à la pharmacie communautaire d’Unisanté, illustre le soutien de l’adhésion des patient-es avec ND par des pharmacien-nes, au travers d’un programme interprofessionnel (IMAP) fondé sur un cadre théorique des sciences du compor- tement. Mettre en place des programmes d’accompagnement comportemental comme PANDIA-IRIS à large échelle en Suisse est à la fois une nécessité et un défi. Ces programmes devraient faire partie intégrante des soins standards des patient-es. La transition des soins vers des collaborations interprofessionnelles et une clarification des rôles dans le soutien de l’adhésion, incluant le-la patient-e comme partenaire, contribueront à considérer pleinement l’adhésion dans la prise de décisions thérapeutiques et dans son accompagnement pour permettre une meilleure atteinte des objectifs cliniques à long terme.Medication non-adherence in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is endemic. The PANDIA-IRIS study, implemented at the community pharmacy of Unisanté, illustrates the support of medication adherence in patients with DKD by pharmacists, through an interprofessional program (IMAP) based on a behavioral science theoretical framework. Implementing behavioural support programmes such as PANDIA-IRIS on a large scale in Switzerland is both a necessity and a challenge. These programmes should be an integral part of standard patient care. The transition of care towards interprofessional collaborations and a clarification of roles in supporting adherence, including the patient as a partner, will contribute to fully considering adherence in therapeutic decision making and support to enable better achievement of long-term clinical goals

Patient adherence to rivaroxaban in deep vein thrombosis, a cohort study in Switzerland: quantitative results.

Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have the advantage of being administered orally at a fixed dose without laboratory monitoring, in contrast to the frequent international normalized ratio measurements used to adjust for vitamin K antagonists dosing. Rivaroxaban, has a short half-life. The anticoagulation effect rapidly decreases if medication adherence is suboptimal. Objective The purpose of this quantitative study (called RIVA) is to longitudinally describe adherence to rivaroxaban (implementation and persistence) in patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Setting The community pharmacy of the Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Switzerland in collaboration with the angiology division of the Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV). Methods This is an observational study. Patients received rivaroxaban for 3 or 6 months: 15 mg twice a day during the first 3 weeks and then 20 mg once a day until the end of the treatment. Adherence was measured using electronic monitoring. Implementation and adherence were modelled using a generalized estimating equation model. Persistence was represented using a Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Main outcome measure Medication adherence (implementation and persistence). Results Thirty-one consecutive patients were included (68% male, mean age: 47 years old). The collected adherence data consisted of 57 inter-visit phases, 2899 electronic monitoring openings and a median follow-up of 92 days (IQR: 87; 100). Implementation to rivaroxaban was initially high [96.3 (92.8; 98.1)] but decreased during the first 3 weeks, until it reached 89.3 (76.0; 95.6). After the switch from twice a day 15 mg to a once a day 20 mg regimen, implementation increased again and remained stable [95.4 (92.2; 97.3)] for 90 days. Four patients who experienced adverse events discontinued the treatment before the end of the study and were considered non-persistent (clinically appropriate discontinuation). Conclusion Adherence to rivaroxaban in deep vein trombosis is high in persistent patients. Discontinuation is related to rivaroxaban adverse effects/toxicity. Implementation should be reinforced during the twice a day-phase, and this first 3-week experience should help patients and healthcare professionals choose the best timing for the once a day phase

Medication Adherence Evaluated Through Electronic Monitors During the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown in Switzerland: A Longitudinal Analysis.

Background During the 2020 COVID-19 lockdown, patients included in the Interprofessional Medication Adherence Program (IMAP) in Switzerland continued to use electronic monitors (EMs) that registered daily drug-dose intake. We aimed to understand to what extent patients' medication implementation (ie, the extent to which the patient took the prescribed medicine), measured with EMs, was impacted by the lockdown. Methods Patients participating in the IMAP were diagnosed with diabetic kidney disease (DKD), solid cancer, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and miscellaneous long-term diseases (MLTD). Patient implementation was defined through a proxy: if all patient EMs were opened at least once daily, implementation was considered active (=1), and no implementation was considered (=0) otherwise. Implementation before (from December 2019 to March 2020), during (March to June 2020) and after (June to September 2020) the lockdown was compared. Subanalyses were performed according to the patients' diseases. Subanalyses were performed in patients who used at least one EM in 2018-2019 during the same periods (defined as winter, spring and summer). The logistic regression models used to estimate medication implementation according to the period were fitted using generalized estimating equations. Results In 2020, patient implementation (n = 118) did not differ significantly before versus during (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.84-1.15, p = 0.789) and before versus after (OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.79-1.06, p = 0.217) the lockdown. These findings remained stable when separately analyzing the implementation of patients with HIV (n = 61), DKD (n = 25) or MLTD (n = 22). Too few patients with cancer were included (n = 10) to interpret the results. In 2019, the implementation of 61/118 (51.7%) patients was significantly lower during summertime versus wintertime (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.60-0.89, p = 0.002). Conclusion Medication implementation remained steady before, during and after the lockdown in 2020. The IMAP before, during and after the lockdown may have supported the adherence of most patients, by ensuring continuity of care during periods of routine disturbances

DataSheet1_The differential impact of a 6-versus 12-month pharmacist-led interprofessional medication adherence program on medication adherence in patients with diabetic kidney disease: the randomized PANDIA-IRIS study.pdf

Background: For every 100 patients with diabetes, 40 will develop diabetic kidney disease (DKD) over time. This diabetes complication may be partly due to poor adherence to their prescribed medications. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the differential impact of a 6- versus 12-month pharmacist-led interprofessional medication adherence program (IMAP) on the components of adherence (i.e., implementation and discontinuation) in patients with DKD, during and after the intervention.Methods: All included patients benefited from the IMAP, which consists in face-to-face regular motivational interviews between the patient and the pharmacist based on the adherence feedback from electronic monitors (EMs), in which the prescribed treatments were delivered. Adherence reports were available to prescribers during the intervention period. Patients were randomized 1:1 into two parallel arms: a 12-month IMAP intervention in group A versus a 6-month intervention in group B. Adherence was monitored continuously for 24 months post-inclusion during the consecutive intervention and follow-up phases. In the follow-up phase post-intervention, EM data were blinded. Blood pressure was measured by the pharmacist at each visit. The repeated measures of daily patient medication intake outcomes (1/0) to antidiabetics, antihypertensive drugs, and statins were modeled longitudinally using the generalized estimated equation in both groups and in both the intervention and the follow-up phases.Results: EM data of 72 patients were analyzed (34 in group A and 38 in group B). Patient implementation to antidiabetics and antihypertensive drugs increased during the IMAP intervention phase and decreased progressively during the follow-up period. At 12 months, implementation to antidiabetics was statistically higher in group A versus group B (93.8% versus 86.8%; Δ 7.0%, 95% CI: 5.7%; 8.3%); implementation to antihypertensive drugs was also higher in group A versus B (97.9% versus 92.1%; Δ 5.8%, 95% CI: 4.8%; 6.7%). At 24 months, implementation to antidiabetics and antihypertensive drugs remained higher in group A versus B (for antidiabetics: 88.6% versus 85.6%; Δ 3.0%, 95% CI: 1.7%; 4.4% and for antihypertensive drugs: 94.4% versus 85.9%; Δ 8.5%, 95% CI: 6.6%; 10.7%). No difference in pharmacy-based blood pressure was observed between groups. Implementation to statins was comparable at each time point between groups. Three patients discontinued at least one treatment; they were all in group B. In total, 46% (16/35) of patients in the 12-month intervention versus 37% (14/38) of patients in the 6-month intervention left the study during the intervention phase, mainly due to personal reasons.Conclusion: The IMAP improves adherence to chronic medications in patients with DKD. The longer the patients benefit from the intervention, the more the implementation increases over time, and the more the effect lasts after the end of the intervention. These data suggest that a 12-month rather than a 6-month program should be provided as a standard of care to support medication adherence in this population. The impact on clinical outcomes needs to be demonstrated.Clinical Trial Registration:Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04190251_PANDIA IRIS.</p