Correction to: Cluster identification, selection, and description in Cluster randomized crossover trials: the PREP-IT trials

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article

Factors Associated with Revision Surgery after Internal Fixation of Hip Fractures

Background: Femoral neck fractures are associated with high rates of revision surgery after management with internal fixation. Using data from the Fixation using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip fractures (FAITH) trial evaluating methods of internal fixation in patients with femoral neck fractures, we investigated associations between baseline and surgical factors and the need for revision surgery to promote healing, relieve pain, treat infection or improve function over 24 months postsurgery. Additionally, we investigated factors associated with (1) hardware removal and (2) implant exchange from cancellous screws (CS) or sliding hip screw (SHS) to total hip arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, or another internal fixation device. Methods: We identified 15 potential factors a priori that may be associated with revision surgery, 7 with hardware removal, and 14 with implant exchange. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses in our investigation. Results: Factors associated with increased risk of revision surgery included: female sex, [hazard ratio (HR) 1.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-2.50; P = 0.001], higher body mass index (fo

Immediate Unprotected Weightbearing After Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures: A Prospective Trial

Category: Trauma; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Ankle fractures are among the most common orthopaedic injuries treated surgically, with indications well- established. However, post-operative care protocols remain controversial and vary widely between surgeons. This prospective controlled trial compared functional outcomes of the local institutional standard (control group) of nonweightbearing (NWB) for two weeks in a short leg splint followed by weightbearing as-tolerated (WBAT) in a boot with range of motion (ROM), versus immediate unprotected weightbearing (IMWB). Methods: 40 consecutive patients undergoing ankle fracture open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) at a single level-1 trauma center meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled into the control group, and the next 40 consecutive patients were enrolled in the IMWB group. The study sample size was powered to detect a statistically significant difference in the Olerud- Molander score (OMAS), the primary study outcome. Secondary outcome measures included the Euroquol-5D (EQ5D) self reported patient score and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) scores, ankle ROM, wound complications, time to return to work, radiograph measurements and loss of fracture reduction. Patients underwent ankle ORIF with surgical technique and implant choice left to the surgeon’s discretion. Postoperative follow-ups were done at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. Results: Demographics of the two groups were similar except for the control group having 4 patients with type II diabetes and the IMWB group having none. There was no statistically significant difference in OMAS at any time point. There were also no statistically significant differences in the EQ5D or WPAI:SHP scores, ROM, time to return to work, or radiographic measurements at any time point. The IMWB group had 5 superficial wound complications versus 1 in the control group. There were 2 cases of loss of reduction in the IMWB group versus none in the control group. Both loss of reductions were determined to not be related to the post operative protocol. Conclusion: Immediate unprotected weightbearing after ORIF of ankle fractures results in equivocal functional outcomes compared with 2 weeks of NWB followed by protected weightbearing and ROM over the first 3 postoperative months. An increased number of wound healing complications was seen in the IMWB group which requires further investigation

Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Reduces Failure of Hamstring Tendon Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: 2-Year Outcomes From the STABILITY Study Randomized Clinical Trial

© 2020 The Author(s). Background: Persistent anterolateral rotatory laxity after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) has been correlated with poor clinical outcomes and graft failure. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that a single-bundle, hamstring ACLR in combination with a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) would reduce the risk of ACLR failure in young, active individuals. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing a single-bundle, hamstring tendon ACLR with or without LET performed using a strip of iliotibial band. Patients 25 years or younger with an ACL-deficient knee were included and also had to meet at least 2 of the following 3 criteria: (1) grade 2 pivot shift or greater, (2) a desire to return to high-risk/pivoting sports, (3) and generalized ligamentous laxity (GLL). The primary outcome was ACLR clinical failure, a composite measure of rotatory laxity or a graft rupture. Secondary outcome measures included the P4 pain scale, Marx Activity Rating Scale, Knee injury Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee score, and ACL Quality of Life Questionnaire. Patients were reviewed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Results: A total of 618 patients (297 males; 48%) with a mean age of 18.9 years (range, 14-25 years) were randomized. A total of 436 (87.9%) patients presented preoperatively with high-grade rotatory laxity (grade 2 pivot shift or greater), and 215 (42.1%) were diagnosed as having GLL. There were 18 patients lost to follow-up and 11 who withdrew (~5%). In the ACLR group, 120/298 (40%) patients sustained the primary outcome of clinical failure, compared with 72/291 (25%) in the ACLR+LET group (relative risk reduction [RRR], 0.38; 95% CI, 0.21-0.52; P \u3c.0001). A total of 45 patients experienced graft rupture, 34/298 (11%) in the ACLR group compared with 11/291 (4%) in the ACL+LET group (RRR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.36-0.83; P \u3c.001). The number needed to treat with LET to prevent 1 patient from graft rupture was 14.3 over the first 2 postoperative years. At 3 months, patients in the ACLR group had less pain as measured by the P4 (P =.003) and KOOS (P =.007), with KOOS pain persisting in favor of the ACLR group to 6 months (P =.02). No clinically important differences in patient-reported outcome measures were found between groups at other time points. The level of sports activity was similar between groups at 2 years after surgery, as measured by the Marx Activity Rating Scale (P =.11). Conclusion: The addition of LET to a single-bundle hamstring tendon autograft ACLR in young patients at high risk of failure results in a statistically significant, clinically relevant reduction in graft rupture and persistent rotatory laxity at 2 years after surgery. Registration: NCT02018354 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier)

Implementing stakeholder engagement to explore alternative models of consent: An example from the PREP-IT trials

Introduction: Cluster randomized crossover trials are often faced with a dilemma when selecting an optimal model of consent, as the traditional model of obtaining informed consent from participant's before initiating any trial related activities may not be suitable. We describe our experience of engaging patient advisors to identify an optimal model of consent for the PREP-IT trials. This paper also examines surrogate measures of success for the selected model of consent. Methods: The PREP-IT program consists of two multi-center cluster randomized crossover trials that engaged patient advisors to determine an optimal model of consent. Patient advisors and stakeholders met regularly and reached consensus on decisions related to the trial design including the model for consent. Patient advisors provided valuable insight on how key decisions on trial design and conduct would be received by participants and the impact these decisions will have. Results: Patient advisors, together with stakeholders, reviewed the pros and cons and the requirements for the traditional model of consent, deferred consent, and waiver of consent. Collectively, they agreed upon a deferred consent model, in which patients may be approached for consent after their fracture surgery and prior to data collection. The consent rate in PREP-IT is 80.7%, and 0.67% of participants have withdrawn consent for participation. Discussion: Involvement of patient advisors in the development of an optimal model of consent has been successful. Engagement of patient advisors is recommended for other large trials where the traditional model of consent may not be optimal