Quality of life of parents with children living at home: when one parent has cancer

Goals of work This study examined the quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients diagnosed 1-5 years previously and their spouses, with children 4-18 years living at home. Relationships between parents' QoL and the children's functioning were explored. Patients and methods 166 cancer patients and their spouses provided information on their QoL (RAND-36) and on their children's functioning (Child Behavior Checklist). Main results Male and female patients scored similarly to a norm population on five domains. Patients' QoL was clinically relevantly and/or statistically lower on social functioning, role limitations because of physical problems, and vitality than the norm. Male spouses' QoL was comparable to the norm. However, female spouses reported better physical functioning but more social problems. QoL varied according to type of cancer, treatment intensity, and recurrence. Using the QoL composite scores, a significant relationship was found between patients' psychosocial and physical functioning and spouses' psychosocial functioning. Patients' psychosocial functioning correlated moderately strongly to weakly with their reports of their younger children's and adolescents' functioning; physical functioning correlated only weakly with adolescents' functioning. The patients' functioning related weakly to moderately strongly to adolescents' self-reports of functioning. Spouses' psychosocial functioning weakly related to their and adolescents' reports of adolescents' functioning. Conclusion Cancer patients' QoL 1-5 years after diagnosis was decreased in three of eight domains; their spouses seem to be doing well. Parents' physical and psychosocial functioning related weakly to moderately strongly to their children's functioning, depending on the child's age and information source. The patients' functioning related more strongly to the children's functioning than the spouses' did

Effects on patient-reported outcomes of "Screening of Distress and Referral Need" implemented in Dutch oncology practice

Purpose This study investigated the effect of the "Screening for Distress and Referral Need" (SDRN) process (completing a screening instrument; patient-caregiver discussion about the patient's responses, regardless of distress level, and possible referral to specialized care), implemented in Dutch oncology practice on patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Methods A non-randomized time-sequential study was conducted to compare two cohorts. Cohort 1 respondents (C1) were recruited before and cohort 2 respondents (C2) after SDRN implementation in nine Dutch hospitals. Participants completed the EORTC-QLQ-C30, HADS, Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-III, and the Distress Thermometer and Problem List (DT&PL). Descriptive analyses and univariate tests were conducted. Results C2 respondents (N = 422, response = 54%) had significantly lower mean scores on the practical (t = 2.3; p = 0.02), social (t = 2.3; p = 0.03), and emotional PL domains (t = 2.9; p = 0.004) compared with C1 (N = 518, response = 53%). No significant differences were found on quality of life, anxiety, depression, satisfaction with care, distress level, the spiritual and physical PL domains, or on referral wish. Conclusions After implementation of SDRN, patients report significantly fewer psychosocial (practical, social, and emotional) problems on the DT/PL but responses on the other patient-reported outcomes were comparable. These results add to the mixed evidence on the beneficial effect of distress screening. More and better focused research is needed

Cancer patients' experiences with and opinions on the process 'Screening of Distress and Referral Need' (SDRN) in clinical practice: A quantitative observational clinical study

OBJECTIVE: This observational clinical study investigated patients' experiences with and opinions on the Dutch 'Screening of Distress and Referral Need' (SDRN) process implemented in oncology practice. Insight into these can guide improvement of the SDRN process. METHODS: Patients from hospitals that had implemented SDRN for at least a year completed questions on experiences with essential SDRN process steps (1: completion of the Distress Thermometer and Problem List as screening instrument (DT&PL), 2: information on SDRN+DT&PL, 3: information on referral options, 4: discussing DT&PL responses, 5: referral when needed), and on opinions about SDRN and DT&PL. Descriptive and univariate analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Of the 498 participants (response = 54%), 81% completed a DT&PL, of whom 86-87% was exposed to steps 2-3 and 76% discussed responses; only three needing care were not offered referral. Sixty-one percent encountered all SDRN steps and 78% would recommend SDRN to others. Recommending SDRN is related to more frequent DT&PL completion (t = -2.5; p≤0.01), receipt of information on SDRN+DT&PL and referral options (X2 = 4.9; p≤0.05 and X2 = 5.9; p≤0.05 respectively), discussion of responses (X2 = 10.2; p≤0.001), and fuller exposure to SDRN process steps (X2 = 14.8; p≤0.01). Percentages (strongly) agreeing were highest on the DT&PL being useful (90%) and suitable (88%), and lowest on burdensome (31%) and time-consuming (28%). CONCLUSION: The majority of participating patients encountered the steps of the SDRN process considered essential, with 3/5 having encountered all steps. Referral is largely targeted to patients' need. Patients' perceived benefit of SDRN increases with fuller exposure to all process steps. Therefore, improvements, particularly in DT&PL completion and discussion of responses should be made

Descriptives on study questions 1–5 and on variable created post-hoc, and univariate effects on respondents’ recommendation (question 7).

<p>Descriptives on study questions 1–5 and on variable created post-hoc, and univariate effects on respondents’ recommendation (question 7).</p

Descriptives on the DT&PL opinion statements (question 6), and univariate effects of opinions on information received, responses discussed, satisfaction with discussion, and recommending others.

<p>Descriptives on the DT&PL opinion statements (question 6), and univariate effects of opinions on information received, responses discussed, satisfaction with discussion, and recommending others.</p

Socio-demographic and illness-related characteristics and comparison between respondents who completed a DT&PL after diagnosis and those who did not.

<p>Socio-demographic and illness-related characteristics and comparison between respondents who completed a DT&PL after diagnosis and those who did not.</p

The relationship between reciprocity and burnout in Dutch medical residents

OBJECTIVE This study examined reciprocity in medical residents' relationships with supervisors, fellow residents, nurses and patients, and associations between reciprocity and burnout. Furthermore, we considered if a discrepancy between the perceived and preferred levels of reciprocity influenced the level of burnout complaints. METHODS In 2003, self-report questionnaires were sent to the homes of all 292 medical residents at the University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, the Netherlands. Reciprocity was measured with a single-item reciprocity scale based on the Hatfield Global Measure of Equity Scale. The Utrecht Burn-Out Scale (UBOS/MBI-HHS) was used to measure burnout. RESULTS A total of 158 residents participated in the study. Those who reported under-benefiting in the relationship with supervisors perceived significantly more emotional exhaustion and depersonalisation than those who perceived a reciprocal relationship. Residents who indicated that they over-benefited in the relationship with nurses reported more emotional exhaustion than residents who perceived a reciprocal relationship and less personal accomplishment than residents who perceived a reciprocal relationship or under-benefit. No differences on the burnout subscales were found between residents who perceived their relationships with patients and fellow residents to be reciprocal and those who considered they under- or over-benefited. The greater the discrepancy between perceived and preferred reciprocity in the relationship with the supervisor, the more emotional exhaustion residents reported. CONCLUSIONS Perceptions of reciprocity in relationships with supervisors and nurses had particular influence on the level of burnout complaints among residents. The discrepancy between the impacts of perceived and preferred reciprocity on burnout was negligible and the only significant relationship to emerge concerned that with emotional exhaustion