3 research outputs found
Cell Culture and Maintenance of the Evolutionary Forms of <em>Trypanosoma cruzi</em> for Studies of Parasitic Biology
This chapter aims to present and discuss the main cell culture techniques used for the growth and maintenance of the different evolutionary forms of the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi, the etiologic agent of the Chagas disease. Chagas disease is a neglected tropical disease endemic in several Latin American countries. Here, we intend to present the main difficulties, advantages, and disadvantages of using Trypanosoma cruzi cell culture in parasitic biology. Finally, we present the main research opportunities in the context of Trypanosoma cruzi parasitic biology using cell culture techniques, such as drug development, characterization of pharmacological targets, molecular markers for diagnosis, structural biology, and many other biomedical applications
Identificação e caracterização imunoquĂmica de antigĂ©nios de tripanosomatĂdeos envolvidos na reatividade serolĂłgica entre Trypanosoma cruzi e Leishmania spp.
As doenças tropicais negligenciadas, doença de Chagas e Leishmaniose Visceral, cujos
agentes etiolĂłgicos sĂŁo os protozoĂĄrios Trypanosoma cruzi e Leishmania infantum,
respectivamente, exibem distribuição geogrĂĄfica sobreponĂvel e endemicidades
semelhantes em diversas ĂĄreas. Trypanosoma cruzi e Leishmania infantum pertencem Ă
mesma famĂlia e compartilham repertĂłrios de epĂtopos antigĂȘnicos com proteĂnas
conservadas que podem ser responsĂĄveis pela reatividade serolĂłgica cruzada no
imunodiagnóstico da doença de Chagas e Leishmaniose Visceral. ReaçÔes serológicas
cruzadas provocam alteraçÔes na precisão do imunodiagnóstico laboratorial destas
doenças, podendo gerar distorçÔes em inquéritos serológicos e estudos epidemiológicos.
Este estudo realizou a caracterização antigénica e serológica cruzada em soros de
indivĂduos diagnosticados com a doença de Chagas e Leishmaniose Visceral. Por
ELISA foi avaliada a seroreatividade antigénica de Trypanosoma cruzi e Leishmania
infantum com a determinação do perfil serolĂłgico de anticorpos IgG totais anti Trypanosoma cruzi e anti-Leishmania infantum em amostras de soros de indivĂduos
com a doença de Chagas (n=240) ou Leishmaniose Visceral (n=240), respectivamente.
A pesquisa da reatividade serolĂłgica cruzada foi feita por ELISA, quantificando
anticorpos IgG totais anti-Trypanosoma cruzi em soros de Leishmaniose Visceral
(n=240) e anticorpos IgG totais anti-Leishmania infantum em soros de doença de
Chagas (n=240). Utilizou-se a técnica de immunoblotting para detetar fraçÔes proteicas
de Trypanosoma cruzi e Leishmania infantum em soros de Leishmaniose Visceral e
doença de Chagas, respectivamente. Anticorpos IgG totais anti-Trypanosoma cruzi
foram detetados em 95,8% (230/240) de soros com doença de Chagas e anticorpos
totais anti-Leishmania infantum foram detetados em 94,6% (227/240) de soros com
Leishmaniose Visceral. Anticorpos IgG totais anti-Leishmania infantum foram
detetados em 91,2% (219/240) de soros com doença de Chagas e anticorpos IgG totais
anti-Trypanosoma cruzi foram detetados em 91,2% (219/240) de soros com
Leishmaniose Visceral. Conclui-se que anticorpos anti-Trypanosoma cruzi reconhecem
o antigénio Leishmania infantum tanto quanto anticorpos anti-Leishmania infantum
reconhecem o antigĂ©nio Trypanosoma cruzi, em soros de indivĂduos infetados com
doença de Chagas e Leishmaniose Visceral. A pesquisa pela deteção de proteĂnas
comuns aos parasitas analisados pode ser a diretriz para se chegar a um teste diagnĂłstico
com a sensibilidade e especificidade desejadas e que nĂŁo provoque seroreatividade
cruzada entre o diagnóstico de doença de Chagas e Leishmaniose VisceralNeglected tropical diseases, Chagas disease and Visceral Leishmaniasis, caused by
protozoa Trypanosoma cruzi and Leishmania infantum parasites respectively, exhibit
geographic distribution overlapping and endemicity. Besides, both protozoans belong to
the trypanosomatidae family. Consequently, antigenic epitopes repertoire, manly
common conserved proteins, is believed to be responsible for the serological cross reactivity between Chagas disease and Visceral Leishmaniasis. The immunodiagnosticsâ
precision tests are changed by cross serological reactions. Thus, lead to distortions in
serological surveys and epidemiological data analysis. This study carried out the
antigenic and serological cross characterization in individualsâ sera diagnosed with
Chagas disease and Visceral Leishmaniasis. ELISA assay, the antigenic seroreactivity
was used to determine the serological profile of total IgG antibodies anti-Trypanosoma
cruzi and anti-Leishmania infantum in serum samples from individuals with Chagas
disease (n = 240) or Visceral Leishmaniasis (n = 240). The investigation of serological
cross-reactivity was performed also by ELISA, quantifying total IgG antibodies anti Trypanosoma cruzi in individualsâ serums of Visceral Leishmaniasis (n = 240) and total
IgG antibodies anti-Leishmania infantum in sera form Chagas disease individuals (n =
240). The immunoblotting technique was used to detect protein fractions of
Trypanosoma cruzi and Leishmania infantum in sera of Visceral Leishmaniasis and
Chagas disease, respectively. As result, total anti-Trypanosoma cruzi IgG antibodies
were detected in 95.8% (230/240) of sera with Chagas disease and total anti-Leishmania
infantum antibodies were detected in 94.6% (227/240) of sera with Visceral
Leishmaniasis. The cross serological showed that anti-Leishmania infantum IgG
antibodies were detected in 91.2% (219/240) of sera with Chagas disease and total anti Trypanosoma cruzi IgG antibodies were detected in 91.2% (219/240) of sera with
visceral leishmaniasis. This study concluded that anti-Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies
recognize the Leishmania infantum antigen, as well as anti-Leishmania infantum
antibodies, recognize the Trypanosoma cruzi antigen, in sera from individuals infected
with Chagas disease and Visceral Leishmaniasis. The identification of conserved
proteins parasites implicated in cross-reactivity may be the guideline for the
improvement of diagnostic tests. Therefore, desirable sensitivity and specificity and that
do not cause cross-reactivity between the diagnosis of Chagas disease and Visceral
Leishmaniasis
Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy (EAGLE): pragmatic, batched stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in 64 countries
Background
Anastomotic leak affects 8 per cent of patients after right colectomy with a 10-fold increased risk of postoperative death. The EAGLE study aimed to develop and test whether an international, standardized quality improvement intervention could reduce anastomotic leaks.
Methods
The internationally intended protocol, iteratively co-developed by a multistage Delphi process, comprised an online educational module introducing risk stratification, an intraoperative checklist, and harmonized surgical techniques. Clusters (hospital teams) were randomized to one of three arms with varied sequences of intervention/data collection by a derived stepped-wedge batch design (at least 18 hospital teams per batch). Patients were blinded to the study allocation. Low- and middle-income country enrolment was encouraged. The primary outcome (assessed by intention to treat) was anastomotic leak rate, and subgroup analyses by module completion (at least 80 per cent of surgeons, high engagement; less than 50 per cent, low engagement) were preplanned.
Results
A total 355 hospital teams registered, with 332 from 64 countries (39.2 per cent low and middle income) included in the final analysis. The online modules were completed by half of the surgeons (2143 of 4411). The primary analysis included 3039 of the 3268 patients recruited (206 patients had no anastomosis and 23 were lost to follow-up), with anastomotic leaks arising before and after the intervention in 10.1 and 9.6 per cent respectively (adjusted OR 0.87, 95 per cent c.i. 0.59 to 1.30; P = 0.498). The proportion of surgeons completing the educational modules was an influence: the leak rate decreased from 12.2 per cent (61 of 500) before intervention to 5.1 per cent (24 of 473) after intervention in high-engagement centres (adjusted OR 0.36, 0.20 to 0.64; P < 0.001), but this was not observed in low-engagement hospitals (8.3 per cent (59 of 714) and 13.8 per cent (61 of 443) respectively; adjusted OR 2.09, 1.31 to 3.31).
Conclusion
Completion of globally available digital training by engaged teams can alter anastomotic leak rates. Registration number: NCT04270721 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)