Outcomes of cardiac surgery after mediastinal radiation therapy: A single-center experience

Background: Mediastinal radiation therapy (MRT) is a widely used therapy for thoracic malignancies. This therapy has the potential to cause cardiovascular injuries, which may require surgery. The primary aim of this study is to identify the perioperative outcomes of cardiac surgery in patients with a history of MRT. Second, potential predictors of mortality and adverse events were identified. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted among 59 patients with prior MRT who underwent cardiac surgery between December 2009 and March 2015. Included surgeries consisted of procedures through median- and ministernotomy. Baseline, perioperative, and follow-up data were obtained and analyzed. Results: The majority of patients had a history of breast cancer (n = 43), followed by Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 10) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 3). Preoperative estimated mortality with the Euroscore II was 3.4%. Overall 30-day mortality was 6.8% (n = 4), with a total in-hospital mortality of 10.2% (n = 6). Postoperatively, nine rethoracotomies (15.3%) had to be performed. During a mean follow-up of 53 months, an additional 10 patients (16.9%) died, of which 60% (n = 6) as a result of cancer-related events. Cox proportional modeling showed no differences in mortality between primary malignancies (P >.05). Conclusion: This study shows that cardiac surgery after mediastinal radiotherapy is associated with increased short- and long-term mortality when compared to preoperative mortality risks predicted by the Euroscore II. Surgery-related events caused all short-term mortality cases, while malignancy-related events were the main cause of death during the follow-up. Mortality was higher in patients with a previous stroke and a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate

Are Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Patients at Increased Risk for Cardiovascular Diseases?

Objectives: Abdominal aortic aneurysms are associated with a sharply increased cardiovascular risk. Cardiovascular risk management is therefore recommended in prevailing guidelines for abdominal aneurysm patients. It has been hypothesized that associated risk relates to loss of aortic compliance. If this hypothesis is correct, observations for abdominal aneurysms would also apply to thoracic aortic aneurysms. The objective of this study is to test whether thoracic aneurysms are also associated with an increased cardiovascular risk burden. Methods: Patients who underwent aortic valve or root surgery were included in the study (n = 239). Cardiovascular risk factors were studied and atherosclerosis was scored based on the preoperative coronary angiographies. Multivariate analyses were performed, controlling for cardiovascular risk factors and aortic valve morphology. Comparisons were made with the age- and gender-matched general population and non-aneurysm patients as control groups. A thoracic aortic aneurysm was defined as an aortic aneurysm of ≥45 mm. Results: Thoracic aortic aneurysm was not associated with an increased coronary atherosclerotic burden (p = 0.548). Comparison with the general population revealed a significantly higher prevalence of hypertension (61.4% vs. 32.2%, p p = 0.001) in the thoracic aneurysm group. Conclusions: The extreme cardiovascular risk associated with abdominal aortic aneurysms is location-specific and not explained by loss of aortic compliance. Thoracic aortic aneurysm, in contrast to abdominal, is not part of the atherosclerotic disease spectrum and, therefore, cardiovascular risk management does not need to be implemented in treatment guidelines of isolated thoracic aneurysms. Hypertension should be treated

Are Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Patients at Increased Risk for Cardiovascular Diseases?

Objectives: Abdominal aortic aneurysms are associated with a sharply increased cardiovascular risk. Cardiovascular risk management is therefore recommended in prevailing guidelines for abdominal aneurysm patients. It has been hypothesized that associated risk relates to loss of aortic compliance. If this hypothesis is correct, observations for abdominal aneurysms would also apply to thoracic aortic aneurysms. The objective of this study is to test whether thoracic aneurysms are also associated with an increased cardiovascular risk burden. Methods: Patients who underwent aortic valve or root surgery were included in the study (n = 239). Cardiovascular risk factors were studied and atherosclerosis was scored based on the preoperative coronary angiographies. Multivariate analyses were performed, controlling for cardiovascular risk factors and aortic valve morphology. Comparisons were made with the age- and gender-matched general population and non-aneurysm patients as control groups. A thoracic aortic aneurysm was defined as an aortic aneurysm of ≥45 mm. Results: Thoracic aortic aneurysm was not associated with an increased coronary atherosclerotic burden (p = 0.548). Comparison with the general population revealed a significantly higher prevalence of hypertension (61.4% vs. 32.2%, p < 0.001) and a lower prevalence of diabetes (1.4% vs. 13.1%, p = 0.001) in the thoracic aneurysm group. Conclusions: The extreme cardiovascular risk associated with abdominal aortic aneurysms is location-specific and not explained by loss of aortic compliance. Thoracic aortic aneurysm, in contrast to abdominal, is not part of the atherosclerotic disease spectrum and, therefore, cardiovascular risk management does not need to be implemented in treatment guidelines of isolated thoracic aneurysms. Hypertension should be treated

Risk for acquired coronary artery disease in genetic vs. congenital thoracic aortopathy

Objective: Patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) and patients with a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) have a significantly increased risk to develop thoracic aortopathy. Both conditions share many pathophysiological mechanisms leading to aortic complications. Bicuspidy is known to have a low risk for acquired coronary artery sclerosis. The aim of this study is to determine the risk of coronary sclerosis in MFS patients. Methods: Marfan syndrome patients with an aortic root dilatation, which were surgically treated between 1999 and 2017, were included and matched with BAV and tricuspid aortic valves (TAV) patients based on sex and age. Cardiovascular risk profiles were determined in all three groups. Coronary sclerosis was graded in all patients on coronary imaging (coronary angiography or computed tomography) using a coronary artery scoring method, which divides the coronaries in 28 segments and scores non-obstructive (20?49% sclerosis) and obstructive coronary sclerosis (>49% sclerosis) in each segment. Results: A total of 90 matched patients (30 within each group) were included. MFS patients showed less cardiovascular risk factors compared to BAV and TAV patients. TAV patients had higher amounts of obstructive coronary sclerosis as compared to BAV patients (p = 0.039) and MFS patients (p = 0.032). No difference in non- and obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) was found between the MFS and BAV population. Conclusion: Marfan syndrome and bicuspid aortic valve patients have a significantly lower risk for, and prevalence of CAD as compared to TAV individuals

Additional file 1 of Thoracic aortic atherosclerosis in patients with a bicuspid aortic valve; a case–control study

Additional file 1: Supplemental table 1. Patient characteristics of BAV and TAV patients in histopathological cohort (divided according to aortic valve disease†). Supplemental table 2. Patient characteristics of TAA and non-TAA patients in the clinical evaluation cohort (computed tomography). Supplemental figure 1. Coronary artery segments (according to CASS) and the corresponding weight factors used for the CAGE score [15, 22–24]. Supplemental figure 2. Examples of aortic calcification on computed tomography

Complications While Waiting for IBD Surgery-Short Report

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: While striving to meet the quality standards for oncological care, hospitals frequently prioritize oncological procedures, resulting in longer waiting times to surgery for benign diseases like inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. The aim of this Short Report is to highlight the potential consequences of a longer interval to surgery for IBD patients. METHODS: The mean waiting times to elective surgery for IBD patients with active and inactive disease [e.g. pouch surgery after subtotal colectomy] at the Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, between 2013 and 2015 were compared with those for colorectal cancer surgery. Correlations between IBD waiting times and disease complications [e.g. >5% weight loss, abscess formation] and additional health-care consumption [e.g. telephone/outpatient clinic appointment, hospital admission] during these waiting times were assessed. RESULTS: The mean waiting was 10 weeks [SD 8] for patients with active disease [n = 173] and 15 weeks [SD 16] for those with inactive disease [n = 97], remarkably higher than that for colorectal cancer patients [5 weeks]. While awaiting surgery, 1 out of 8 patients had to undergo surgery in an acute or semi-acute setting. Additionally, 19% of patients with active disease had disease complications, and 44% needed additional health care. The rates were comparable for patients with inactive disease. CONCLUSIONS: The current waiting time to surgery is not medically justified and creates a burden for health-care resources. This issue should be brought to the attention of policy makers, as it requires a structural solution. It is time to also set a maximally acceptable waiting time to surgery for IBD patients