The bioarchaeology of Anglo-Saxon Yorkshire: present and future perspectives

The Anglo-Saxon period in Yorkshire - in terms of our knowledge of those questions which bioarchaeological studies are conventionally used to address - remains very much an unknown quantity, We can hardly claim even to know whether these questions are indeed appropriate in the Anglo-Saxon period. To some extent this reflects the nature of the Anglo-Saxon deposits so far encountered, in which preservation of the less durable organic remains has been very limited. The nature of Anglo-Saxon occupation, with a bias towards rural settlements of a kind whicb have generally left only faint traces in the ground, means that there are no deeply stratified richly organic deposits of the kind revealed in some Roman and Viking Age phases in major urban centres, of which only York is weIl known in the region. The Anglo-Saxon period thus presents exceptional challenges to the environmental archaeologist, and ones which closely parallel those for the Iron Age. It is a period for which the kind of assemblages traditionally provided by bioarchaeologica1 studies are most urgently needed, to define environment and land use, resource exploitation, living conditions, trade and exchange, as well as aspects of craft-working and industrial activities. In addition, the period in Yorkshire presents special problems concerning the status of individual rural or ecclesiastical settlements, particularly the nature of York as a possible wic. For the purposes of this paper (and in view of the complexities of the archaeology of the 5th to 11th centuries), we have elected to discuss only such biological material as .falls after the end of the Roman period (as generally accepted) and before the first significant waves of Scandinavian invasion in the mid 9th century

Quantifying the effects of an increasingly warmer climate with a view to improving the resilience of Great Britain's railway network: Is a new stressing regime the answer?

The existing temperature profile in Great Britain determines the stress free temperature of continuous welded rail on the railway network, this ensures that cold-related tension cracks and heat-related rail buckles are kept within tolerable levels. It is predicted that winters will become warmer and summers hotter than the baseline climate. It is believed that Great Britain can continue to operate with a stress free (rail) temperature of 27°C under future climate scenarios, provided the acceptable operating range is narrowed upwards towards 27°C and that the quality of track, track-bed and subgrade are improved. These actions should limit the potential damage caused by more challenging temperature extremes. If changes are not made to ensure the track is more resilient to hotter summers the cost of buckles and heat related delays are projected to increase from £3.3m under baseline climate conditions to £24.7m in the 2080s under the high emissions climate change scenario. In winter the temperature range that causes the majority and most severe ice and snow delays is not expected to undergo much change for most of Great Britain until the 2080’s under the high emissions scenario, when there will be nominal reductions, mostly in the south region

An Ecological and Evolutionary Framework for Commensalism in Anthropogenic Environments

Acknowledgements We would like to thank Jean-Denis Vigne, members of the Searle lab, and SNEEB at Cornell University for a stimulating environment and many early discussions and comments. We would also like to thank Maeve McMahon for comments on the manuscript.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Evaluating the roles of directed breeding and gene flow in animal domestication

Peer reviewedPostprin

To fish or not to fish? Evidence for the possible avoidance of fish consumption during the Iron Age around the North Sea

Accounts of the Late Iron Age economy of the areas around the southern part of the North Sea typically do not refer to fishing as an important contribution to subsistence (e.g. Bloemers and Van Dorp 1991; Green 1992; Van Heeringen 1992; Cunliffe 1995; Champion and Collis 1996). In the case of freshwater fishing, most texts seem to assume implicitly (by referring to older periods and common sense) that some food procurement did occur in inland waters, but how important this activity was remains unclear. The evaluation of marine resource exploitation is even more problematic for the Late Iron Age. We do not really know to what extent people were fishing in the sea, and, when they did, whether this fishing was practised in the estuaries, along the coast, or in open waters. In any case, the evidence is very scarce, but whether this is proof for a lack of interest in marine and freshwater resources needs to be more fully evaluated. If some Late Iron Age peoples in north-west Europe did not incorporate aquatic resources as a significant part of their subsistence strategies, it remains unclear why this would have been the case. Was this because of ecological conditions, different economic options, a lack of economic specialisation, a lack of technology, or other reasons? The following paper reviews the Iron Age zooarchaeological record for three countries bordering the North Sea (England, Belgium, and the Netherlands) in order to evaluate more fully the possible nature and extent of fish exploitation

Phenotype and animal domestication : A study of dental variation between domestic, wild, captive, hybrid and insular Sus scrofa

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Acknowledgements We thank the institutions and individuals that provided access to collections, especially the curators of the Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin; Zoologische Staatssammlung, München; Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris; Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle, Genève; National Museum of Natural History, Washington; The Field Museum, Chicago and The American Museum of Natural History, New-York. We also thank Jean-Denis Vigne, Nelly Gidaszewski, Vincent Debat and Mathieu Joron for fruitful discussions. This work was supported by a research grant from the Natural Environment Research Council, UK (grant number NE/F003382/1).Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Using traditional biometrical data to distinguish West Palearctic wild boar and domestic pigs in the archaeological record : new methods and standards

Peer reviewedPostprin