26 research outputs found

    A community effort in SARS-CoV-2 drug discovery.

    Get PDF
    peer reviewedThe COVID-19 pandemic continues to pose a substantial threat to human lives and is likely to do so for years to come. Despite the availability of vaccines, searching for efficient small-molecule drugs that are widely available, including in low- and middle-income countries, is an ongoing challenge. In this work, we report the results of an open science community effort, the "Billion molecules against Covid-19 challenge", to identify small-molecule inhibitors against SARS-CoV-2 or relevant human receptors. Participating teams used a wide variety of computational methods to screen a minimum of 1 billion virtual molecules against 6 protein targets. Overall, 31 teams participated, and they suggested a total of 639,024 molecules, which were subsequently ranked to find 'consensus compounds'. The organizing team coordinated with various contract research organizations (CROs) and collaborating institutions to synthesize and test 878 compounds for biological activity against proteases (Nsp5, Nsp3, TMPRSS2), nucleocapsid N, RdRP (only the Nsp12 domain), and (alpha) spike protein S. Overall, 27 compounds with weak inhibition/binding were experimentally identified by binding-, cleavage-, and/or viral suppression assays and are presented here. Open science approaches such as the one presented here contribute to the knowledge base of future drug discovery efforts in finding better SARS-CoV-2 treatments.R-AGR-3826 - COVID19-14715687-CovScreen (01/06/2020 - 31/01/2021) - GLAAB Enric

    >

    No full text

    >

    No full text

    SAV-Pred: A Freely Available Web Application for the Prediction of Pathogenic Amino Acid Substitutions for Monogenic Hereditary Diseases Studied in Newborn Screening

    No full text
    Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies are rapidly entering clinical practice. A promising area for their use lies in the field of newborn screening. The mass screening of newborns using NGS technology leads to the discovery of a large number of new missense variants that need to be assessed for association with the development of hereditary diseases. Currently, the primary analysis and identification of pathogenic variations is carried out using bioinformatic tools. Although extensive efforts have been made in the computational approach to variant interpretation, there is currently no generally accepted pathogenicity predictor. In this study, we used the sequence–structure–property relationships (SSPR) approach, based on the representation of protein fragments by molecular structural formula. The approach predicts the pathogenic effect of single amino acid substitutions in proteins related with twenty-five monogenic heritable diseases from the Uniform Screening Panel for Major Conditions recommended by the Advisory Committee on Hereditary Disorders in Newborns and Children. In order to create SSPR models of classification, we modified a piece of cheminformatics software, MultiPASS, that was originally developed for the prediction of activity spectra for drug-like substances. The created SSPR models were compared with traditional bioinformatic tools (SIFT 4G, Polyphen-2 HDIV, MutationAssessor, PROVEAN and FATHMM). The average AUC of our approach was 0.804 ± 0.040. Better quality scores were achieved for 15 from 25 proteins with a significantly higher accuracy for some proteins (IVD, HADHB, HBB). The best SSPR models of classification are freely available in the online resource SAV-Pred (Single Amino acid Variants Predictor)

    SAV-Pred: A Freely Available Web Application for the Prediction of Pathogenic Amino Acid Substitutions for Monogenic Hereditary Diseases Studied in Newborn Screening

    No full text
    Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies are rapidly entering clinical practice. A promising area for their use lies in the field of newborn screening. The mass screening of newborns using NGS technology leads to the discovery of a large number of new missense variants that need to be assessed for association with the development of hereditary diseases. Currently, the primary analysis and identification of pathogenic variations is carried out using bioinformatic tools. Although extensive efforts have been made in the computational approach to variant interpretation, there is currently no generally accepted pathogenicity predictor. In this study, we used the sequence–structure–property relationships (SSPR) approach, based on the representation of protein fragments by molecular structural formula. The approach predicts the pathogenic effect of single amino acid substitutions in proteins related with twenty-five monogenic heritable diseases from the Uniform Screening Panel for Major Conditions recommended by the Advisory Committee on Hereditary Disorders in Newborns and Children. In order to create SSPR models of classification, we modified a piece of cheminformatics software, MultiPASS, that was originally developed for the prediction of activity spectra for drug-like substances. The created SSPR models were compared with traditional bioinformatic tools (SIFT 4G, Polyphen-2 HDIV, MutationAssessor, PROVEAN and FATHMM). The average AUC of our approach was 0.804 ± 0.040. Better quality scores were achieved for 15 from 25 proteins with a significantly higher accuracy for some proteins (IVD, HADHB, HBB). The best SSPR models of classification are freely available in the online resource SAV-Pred (Single Amino acid Variants Predictor)

    In Silico Prediction of Drug–Drug Interactions Mediated by Cytochrome P450 Isoforms

    No full text
    Drug–drug interactions (DDIs) can cause drug toxicities, reduced pharmacological effects, and adverse drug reactions. Studies aiming to determine the possible DDIs for an investigational drug are part of the drug discovery and development process and include an assessment of the DDIs potential mediated by inhibition or induction of the most important drug-metabolizing cytochrome P450 isoforms. Our study was dedicated to creating a computer model for prediction of the DDIs mediated by the seven most important P450 cytochromes: CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C19, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4. For the creation of structure–activity relationship (SAR) models that predict metabolism-mediated DDIs for pairs of molecules, we applied the Prediction of Activity Spectra for Substances (PASS) software and Pairs of Substances Multilevel Neighborhoods of Atoms (PoSMNA) descriptors calculated based on structural formulas. About 2500 records on DDIs mediated by these cytochromes were used as a training set. Prediction can be carried out both for known drugs and for new, not-yet-synthesized substances. The average accuracy of the prediction of DDIs mediated by various isoforms of cytochrome P450 estimated by leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO CV) procedures was about 0.92. The SAR models created are publicly available as a web resource and provide predictions of DDIs mediated by the most important cytochromes P450

    How to Achieve Better Results Using PASS-Based Virtual Screening: Case Study for Kinase Inhibitors

    No full text
    Discovery of new pharmaceutical substances is currently boosted by the possibility of utilization of the Synthetically Accessible Virtual Inventory (SAVI) library, which includes about 283 million molecules, each annotated with a proposed synthetic one-step route from commercially available starting materials. The SAVI database is well-suited for ligand-based methods of virtual screening to select molecules for experimental testing. In this study, we compare the performance of three approaches for the analysis of structure-activity relationships that differ in their criteria for selecting of “active” and “inactive” compounds included in the training sets. PASS (Prediction of Activity Spectra for Substances), which is based on a modified Naïve Bayes algorithm, was applied since it had been shown to be robust and to provide good predictions of many biological activities based on just the structural formula of a compound even if the information in the training set is incomplete. We used different subsets of kinase inhibitors for this case study because many data are currently available on this important class of drug-like molecules. Based on the subsets of kinase inhibitors extracted from the ChEMBL 20 database we performed the PASS training, and then applied the model to ChEMBL 23 compounds not yet present in ChEMBL 20 to identify novel kinase inhibitors. As one may expect, the best prediction accuracy was obtained if only the experimentally confirmed active and inactive compounds for distinct kinases in the training procedure were used. However, for some kinases, reasonable results were obtained even if we used merged training sets, in which we designated as inactives the compounds not tested against the particular kinase. Thus, depending on the availability of data for a particular biological activity, one may choose the first or the second approach for creating ligand-based computational tools to achieve the best possible results in virtual screening

    Data_Sheet_1_How to Achieve Better Results Using Pass-Based Virtual Screening: Case Study for Kinase Inhibitors.docx

    No full text
    <p>Discovery of new pharmaceutical substances is currently boosted by the possibility of utilization of the Synthetically Accessible Virtual Inventory (SAVI) library, which includes about 283 million molecules, each annotated with a proposed synthetic one-step route from commercially available starting materials. The SAVI database is well-suited for ligand-based methods of virtual screening to select molecules for experimental testing. In this study, we compare the performance of three approaches for the analysis of structure-activity relationships that differ in their criteria for selecting of “active” and “inactive” compounds included in the training sets. PASS (Prediction of Activity Spectra for Substances), which is based on a modified Naïve Bayes algorithm, was applied since it had been shown to be robust and to provide good predictions of many biological activities based on just the structural formula of a compound even if the information in the training set is incomplete. We used different subsets of kinase inhibitors for this case study because many data are currently available on this important class of drug-like molecules. Based on the subsets of kinase inhibitors extracted from the ChEMBL 20 database we performed the PASS training, and then applied the model to ChEMBL 23 compounds not yet present in ChEMBL 20 to identify novel kinase inhibitors. As one may expect, the best prediction accuracy was obtained if only the experimentally confirmed active and inactive compounds for distinct kinases in the training procedure were used. However, for some kinases, reasonable results were obtained even if we used merged training sets, in which we designated as inactives the compounds not tested against the particular kinase. Thus, depending on the availability of data for a particular biological activity, one may choose the first or the second approach for creating ligand-based computational tools to achieve the best possible results in virtual screening.</p

    >

    No full text
    corecore