SEOM clinical guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients (2018)

Nutritional deficiency is a common medical problem that affects 15-40% of cancer patients. It negatively impacts their quality of life and can compromise treatment completion. Oncological therapies, such as surgery, radiation therapy, and drug therapies are improving survival rates. However, all these treatments can play a role in the development of malnutrition and/or metabolic alterations in cancer patients, induced by the tumor or by its treatment. Nutritional assessment of cancer patients is necessary at the time of diagnosis and throughout treatment, so as to detect nutritional deficiencies. The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment method is the most widely used tool that also evaluates nutritional requirements. In this guideline, we will review the indications of nutritional interventions as well as artificial nutrition in general and according to the type of treatment (radiotherapy, surgery, or systemic therapy), or palliative care. Likewise, pharmacological agents and pharmaconutrients will be reviewed in addition to the role of regular physical activity

EP05.02-003 Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in Unresectable Stage III NSCLC. Comparative Study of Two Cohorts in the Real-World Setting

[EN] Introduction: Durvalumab is the new standard of care for unresectable locally advanced NSCLC, with PD-L1 _1% and who did not have progression after CRT treatment in the European Union. Our study compares the effectiveness and the frequency of radiation pneumonitis in patients treated with concurrent CRT with or without durvalumab consolidation during the same period in real clinical practice. Methods: A single-center retrospective study. 71 treated patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC were included between March 2018 and December 2021, 37 with CRT followed by durvalumab and 34 with CRT alone. Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and real-world overall survival (rwOS) were calculated since the date of the end CRT. Propensity score matching (PSM) 1:1 was used to account for differences in baseline characteristics. Results: Median age was 67 years (range 46-82). 25.4% of the patients were _75 years old. 78.9% were men and 53.5% former smokers. 54.9% had squamous histology and 28%, 51% and 21% stage IIIA, IIIB and IIIC disease, respectively. The most used scheme was carboplatinpaclitaxel (43.7%), receiving induction chemotherapy in up to 54.9% of patients. 73.2% received between 60-66 Gy doses of radiotherapy. Median time from end of CRT to onset durvalumab was 44 days (range 13-120) with a median of 14 infusions (range 6-27). Of the 34 patients without durvalumab treatment, the expression PD-L1 <1% (58.8%) was the most frequent cause for rejecting consolidation therapy. After PSM analysis, patients distributions were well balanced. With a median follow-up of 19.7 months (range 1.4-36.6); median rw-PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 5-13.5) without durvalumab and 17 months (95% CI, 11-22.9) with durvalumab (p¼0.013). Median rw-OS was 19.3 months (95% CI, 3.8-34.8) without durvalumab and 29.9 months (95% CI, 23.3-36.6) with durvalumab (p¼0.241) with a rw-OS% at 6, 18 and 24 months of 90%, 62% and 49% vs 100%, 86% and 74%, respectively. The rate of radiation pneumonitis was more frequent with durvalumab consolidation (56.8% against 44.1%), (p¼0.346), especially within 3 months after CRT. G3 pneumonitis was only observed in the consolidation therapy. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of durvalumab consolidation after CRT in real-world patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC. Further sample and longer follow-up are required to obtain more accurate results. Active surveillance and appropriate management for radiation pneumonitis are needed, in especially in candidates for consolidation treatmentS

EP05.02-002 Who Benefits More of Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in Real-World Patients with Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)?

[EN] Introduction: Durvalumab received EMA approval as consolidation therapy (CT) for unresectable stage III NSCLC with PD-L1 _1% and who did not have progression after CRT. Our objective was to analyze in real clinical practice the effectiveness of durvalumab and explore the clinical factors that may be associated with the benefit from CT. Methods: Retrospective study was made at Hospital of Leon (Spain), including 37 patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with durvalumab after CRT treatment between March 2018 and october 2021 (40.5% patients were included in the durvalumab early access program). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) could identified after CRT as a factor that may be benefit from durvalumab. Results: Median age was 67 years (range 46-82 years). 40.5% of patients were _70 years old. 78.4% were male and 51.4% smokers. 54% had non-squamous histology. PD-L1 expression was <1% in 5% and not available in 8% patients. 2.7% ROS1 rearrangements, 5.4% KRAS mutations and not available in 43.2% patients. Stage IIIA, IIIB, IIIC disease were 24.3%, 54.1% and 21.6%, respectively. Median time from end of CRT to onset durvalumab was 44 days (range 13-120 days). Overall median CT duration was 214.8 days (range 69-399 days) with a median of 14 infusions (range 6-27 infusions). With a median follow up of 19.7 months (range 1.4-34.9 months); 67.6% had stopped CT: 37.8% due to completing treatment, 16.2% disease progression, 10.8% adverse event and 2.7% due to COVID19 infection. Median real-world progressionfree survival (rwPFS) was 17 months (95% CI, 11-23). Median realworld overall survival (rwOS) was 29.9 months (95% CI, 23.3-36.6). % rwOS at 6, 18 and 24 months were 100%, 86.9% and 74.5%, respectively. For patients with post-CRT NLR not exceeding the cohort median value of 6, receipt of durvalumab was associated with an improvement in rwOS (median not reached vs 25.7 months; p¼0.025). 56.8% patients had any grade of radiation pneumonitis (median time from CRT start: 119 days [range 36-241 days]). Of these, 19% patients developed worsening of radiation pneumonitis with durvalumab. 54,1% developed immune-mediated toxicity, mostly G1-2 (85.1%). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of durvalumab consolidation in this patients population in a real-life setting. We identified low NLR after CRT as a potentially predictive factor for the benefit of CT in locally advanced NSCLC.S