Seismic damage estimation of in-plane regular steel/concrete composite moment resisting frames

© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. Simple empirical expressions to estimate maximum seismic damage on the basis of four well known damage indices for planar regular steel/concrete composite moment resisting frames having steel I beams and concrete filled steel tube (CFT) columns are presented. These expressions are based on the results of an extensive parametric study concerning the inelastic response of a large number of frames to a large number of ordinary far-field type ground motions. Thousands of nonlinear dynamic analyses are performed by scaling the seismic records to different intensities in order to drive the structures to different levels of inelastic deformation. The statistical analysis of the created response databank indicates that the number of stories, beam strength ratio, material strength and ground motion characteristics strongly influence structural damage. Nonlinear regression analysis is employed in order to derive simple formulae, which reflect the influence of the aforementioned parameters and offer a direct estimation of the damage indices used in this study. More specifically, given the characteristics of the structure and the ground motion, one can calculate the maximum damage observed in column bases and beams. Finally, three examples serve to illustrate the use of the proposed expressions and demonstrate their accuracy and efficiency

Seismic damage estimation of in-plane regular steel moment resisting and x-braced frames

Simple empirical expressions to estimate maximum seismic damage on the basis of five well known damage indices for planar regular moment resisting and x-braced steel frames are presented. They are based on the results of extensive parametric studies concerning the inelastic response of a large number of these frames to a large number of ground motions. Thousands of nonlinear dynamic analyses are performed by scaling the seismic records to different intensities in order to drive the structures to different levels of inelastic deformation and finally to collapse. The statistical analysis of the created response databank indicates that the number of stories, period of vibration, stiffness ratio, capacity factor (for moment resisting frames), brace slenderness ratio and column stiffness (for x-braced frames) and characteristics of the ground motion, such as characteristic period and spectral acceleration, strongly influence damage. Nonlinear regression analysis is employed in order to derive simple formulae, which reflect the influence of the aforementioned parameters and offer a direct estimation of the damage indices used in this study. More specifically, given the characteristics of the structure and the ground motion, one can calculate the maximum damage observed in column bases and beams (for moment resisting frames) or in braces (for x-braced frames). Finally, two examples serve to illustrate the use of the proposed expressions and demonstrate their accuracy and efficiency. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

Dynamic analysis of beams by the boundary element method

Summarization: Free and forced flexural vibrations of beams are numerically studied with the aid of the direct boundary element method. The free vibration case is treated as an eigenvalue problem, while the forced vibration one is treated with the aid of the Laplace transform. The structural dynamic response is finally obtained by a numerical inversion of the transformed solution. The effects of a constant axial force, external viscous or internal viscoelastic damping, and an elastic foundation on the response are also considered. Various numerical examples serve to illustrate the method and demonstrate its advantages and disadvantages.Παρουσιάστηκε στο: Computers and Structure