2 research outputs found

    One case, four approaches: The application of psychotherapeutic approaches in sport psychology.

    Get PDF
    Sport and exercise psychology practitioners tasked with service provision within any environment can decide which framework(s) they draw upon to inform their applied work. However, the similarities and differences between psychotherapeutic approaches are under represented in current literature. Therefore, this paper brings together practitioners from four dominant psychotherapeutic approaches to address one specific hypothetical case. Four different cognitive behavioral approaches are outlined, namely rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT), cognitive therapy (CT), schema therapy (ST), and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT). Each practitioner outlines their approach and proceeds to address the case by covering assessment, intervention and evaluation strategies that are specific to their approach. Similarities and differences across the approaches are discussed and implications for practice are put forth. Finally, two further practitioners introduce motivational interviewing (MI) as an additional framework to foster the working alliance

    Organizational stress and well-being in competitive sport: a systematic review

    Get PDF
    Research on organizational stress in sport has grown exponentially within the last two decades. Despite the volume of literature available, no systematic reviews exist to bring findings together in a single, rigorous point of reference. Filling this void helps researchers and practitioners to better understand organizational stress and its implications for health, well-being, and performance. The objectives of this study were to search for, appraise, and critically synthesize the literature on organizational stress (i.e., stressors, appraisals, coping, emotions) and or well-being within the context of organizational stress in competitive sport. In addition, we aimed to identify strengths of and gaps in the literature to progress conceptual, methodological, and applied understanding. A systematic review of literature was conducted using PRISMA guidelines and robust searches of PsycArticles, PsycInfo, and SPORTDiscus databases. The final sample comprised 55 methodologically sound studies with athletes, coaches, and or support staff. The findings of this review revealed a myriad of organizational stressors that were underpinned by a range of situational properties and were managed using a variety of coping options (e.g., problem solving, social support). Some important components of stress transactions (e.g., appraisals, emotions) and well-being have received scant attention in the context of organizational stress. Experiences of organizational stress among athletes, coaches, and support staff have highlighted implications for health- and performance-related outcomes. Future research should consider the use of longitudinal, diary, and integrative designs, in addition to analytical pluralism within under-represented populations (e.g., coaches, support staff) to deepen our understanding
    corecore