14 research outputs found
Reconsidering the Carnap-Kuhn Connection
Recently, some philosophers of science (e.g., GĂŒrol Irzik, Michael Friedman) have challenged the âreceived viewâ on the relationship between
Rudolf Carnap and Thomas Kuhn, suggesting that there is a close affinity
(rather than opposition) between their philosophical views. In support of this argument, these authors cite Carnap and Kuhnâs similar views on
incommensurability, theory-choice, and scientific revolutions. Against this
revisionist view, I argue that the philosophical relationship between Carnap and Kuhn should be regarded as opposed rather than complementary. In particular, I argue that a consideration of the fundamentally disparate nature of the broader philosophical projects of Carnap (logic of science)
and Kuhn (providing a theory of scientific revolutions)renders the alleged similarities between their views superficial in comparison to their fundamental differences. In defense of the received view, I suggest that Carnap and Kuhn are model representatives of two contrasting styles of
doing philosophy of science, viz., logical analysis and historical
analysis respectively. This analysis clarifies the
role played by Kuhnâs Structure of Scientific Revolutions
in the demise of logical empiricism in the second half of the twentieth-century
The Forgotten Tradition. How the Logical Empiricists missed the Philosophical Significance of the work of Riemann, Christoffel and Ricci
Abstract. The paper attempts to show how the Logical Empiricistsâ interpretation of the relation between geometry and reality emerges from a âcollisionâ of mathematical traditions. Considering Riemannâs work as the initiator of a 19th century geometrical tradition, whose main protagonists were Helmholtz and PoincarĂ©, the Logical Empiricists neglected the fact that Riemannâs revolutionary insight flourished rather in a non-geometrical tradition dominated by the works of Christoffel and Ricci-Curbastro roughly in the same years. I will argue that in the attempt to draw the line Riemann-Helmholtz-PoincarĂ©-Einstein Logical Empiricists were led to argue that General Relativity raised mainly a problem of mathematical under-determination, i.e. the discovery that there are physical differences that cannot be expressed in the relevant mathematical structure of the theory. However, a historical reconstruction of the alternative line of development Riemann-Chritoffel-Ricci-Einstein shows on the contrary that the main philosophical issue raised by Einsteinâs theory was rather that of mathematical over-determination, i.e. the recognition of the presence of redundant mathematical differences that do not have any correspondence in physical reality
Selective DNA Purine Base Photooxidation by Bis-terdentate Iridium(III) Polypyridyl and Cyclometalated Complexes
Two bis-terdentate iridium(III) complexes with polypyridyl and cyclometalated ligands have been prepared and characterized. Their spectroscopic and electrochemical properties have been studied, and a photophysical scheme addressing their properties is proposed. Different types of excited states have been considered to account for the deactivation processes in each complex. Interestingly, in the presence of mono- or polynucleotides, a photoinduced electron-transfer process from a DNA purine base (i.e., guanine or adenine) to the excited complex is shown through luminescence quenching experiments. For the first time, this work reports evidence for selective DNA purine bases oxidation by excited iridium(III) bis-terdentate complexes. © 2014 American Chemical Society