Side by Side Battery Technologies with Lithium‐Ion Based Batteries

In recent years, the electrochemical power sources community has launched massive research programs, conferences, and workshops on the “post Li battery era.” However, in this report it is shown that the quest for post Li‐ion and Li battery technologies is incorrect in its essence. This is the outcome of a three day discussion on the future technologies that could provide an answer to a question that many ask these days: Which are the technologies that can be regarded as alternative to Li‐ion batteries? The answer to this question is a rather surprising one: Li‐ion battery technology will be here for many years to come, and therefore the use of “post Li‐ion” battery technologies would be misleading. However, there are applications with needs for which Li‐ion batteries will not be able to provide complete technological solutions, as well as lower cost and sustainability. In these specific cases, other battery technologies will play a key role. Here, the term “side‐by‐side technologies” is coined alongside a discussion of its meaning. The progress report does not cover the topic of Li‐metal battery technologies, but covers the technologies of sodium‐ion, multivalent, metal–air, and flow batteries

Bridging the Gap between Small Molecular π-Interactions and Their Effect on Phenothiazine-Based Redox Polymers in Organic Batteries

Organic redox polymers are considered a “greener” alternative as battery electrode materials compared to transition metal oxides. Among these, phenothiazine-based polymers have attracted significant attention due to their high redox potential of 3.5 V vs Li/Li+ and reversible electrochemistry. In addition, phenothiazine units can exhibit mutual π-interactions, which stabilize their oxidized states. In poly(3-vinyl-N-methylphenothiazine) (PVMPT), such π-interactions led to a unique charge/discharge mechanism, involving the dissolution and redeposition of the polymer during cycling, and resulted in an ultrahigh cycling stability. Herein, we investigate these π-interactions in more detail and what effect their suppression by molecular design has on battery performance. Our study includes a dimeric reference compound for PVMPT, polymers with bulky tolyl or mesityl substituents on the phenothiazine units to inhibit π-interactions and alternating copolymers with maleimide groups to increase spatial distancing between phenothiazine groups. UV/vis- and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR)-spectroscopic as well as electrochemical measurements in composite electrodes demonstrate how the unique structure of PVMPT is instrumental in obtaining a high cycling stability in poly(vinylene) derivatives of phenothiazine

Dibenzo[ a , e ]Cyclooctatetraene‐Functionalized Polymers as Potential Battery Electrode Materials

Organic redox polymers are attractive electrode materials for more sustainable rechargeable batteries. To obtain full-organic cells with high operating voltages, redox polymers with low potentials (<2 V versus Li|Li+) are required for the negative electrode. Dibenzo[a,e]cyclooctatetraene (DBCOT) is a promising redox-active group in this respect, since it can be reversibly reduced in a two-electron process at potentials below 1 V versus Li|Li+. Upon reduction, its conformation changes from tub-shaped to planar, rendering DBCOT-based polymers also of interest to molecular actuators. Here, the syntheses of three aliphatic DBCOT-polymers and their electrochemical properties are presented. For this, a viable three-step synthetic route to 2-bromo-functionalized DBCOT as polymer precursor is developed. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements in solution and of thin films of the DBCOT-polymers demonstrate their potential as battery electrode materials. Half-cell measurements in batteries show pseudo capacitive behavior with Faradaic contributions, which demonstrate that electrode composition and fabrication will play an important role in the future to release the full redox activity of the DBCOT polymers