The effect of hospital factors on mortality rates after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

BackgroundPatient factors that contribute to mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair have been previously described, but few studies have delineated the hospital factors that may be associated with an increase in patient mortality after AAA. This study used a large national database to identify hospital factors that affect mortality rates after open repair (OAR) and endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) of elective and ruptured AAA.MethodsA retrospective analysis was completed using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1998 to 2011. International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision codes were used to identify patients who underwent elective or ruptured AAA repair by OAR or EVAR. The association between mortality and hospital covariates, including ownership, bed size, region, and individual hospital volume for these patients was statistically delineated by analysis of variance, χ2, and Mann-Kendall trend analysis.ResultsA total of 128,232 patients were identified over the 14-year period, of which 88.5% were elective procedures and 11.5% were performed acutely for rupture. Most hospitals that complete elective OAR do between one and 50 cases, with mortality between 0% and 40%. Hospitals with mortality >40% uniformly complete fewer than five elective OAR cases annually and fall in the bottom 2.5% of all hospitals for mortality. Most hospitals that complete elective EVAR do between one and 70 cases, with mortality between 0% and 13%. Hospitals with mortality >13% uniformly complete fewer than eight elective EVAR cases annually and fall in the bottom 2.5% of all hospitals for mortality. The majority of hospitals that complete OAR or EVAR for ruptured AAA have between 0% to 100% for mortality, indicative of the high mortality risk associated with rupture.ConclusionsHospitals that complete fewer than five OARs or eight EVARs annually have significantly greater mortality compared with their counterparts. Improved implementation of best practices, more detailed informed consent to include hospital mortality data, and better regional access to health care may improve survival after elective AAA repair

arteriovenous access graft infection standards of reporting and implications for comparative data analysis

Abstract There is presently a lack of organization and standardized reporting schema for arteriovenous graft (AVG) infections. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the various types of treatment modalities for access site infections through an analysis of current publications on AVG. Key proposals are made to support standardization in a data-driven manner to make infection reporting more uniform and thereby facilitate more meaningful comparisons between various dialysis modalities and AVG technologies

Outcomes after endovascular repair of arterial trauma

BackgroundEndovascular repair of peripheral arterial trauma using covered stent grafts is a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery in selected patients. Although the technical feasibility of endovascular repair has been established, there are a paucity of data regarding outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of endovascular repair in patients with peripheral arterial trauma.MethodsA review of a prospectively collected institutional trauma registry captured all patients with peripheral arterial injury who underwent endovascular repair from August 2004 to June 2012. Data collected included demographics, Injury Severity Score (ISS), mechanism, location and type of injury, imaging modality, intervention type, complications and reintervention, length of stay, and follow-up. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.ResultsDuring the study period, we performed endovascular repair in 28 patients with peripheral arterial injuries. There were 20 male patients (71%) with a median age of 39 years (range, 13-88 years). The mean ISS was 17.2 (range, 9-41). The mechanism of injury was penetrating in 21 (75%) and blunt in seven (25%). The anatomic locations of the 28 arterial injuries were carotid (3 [11%]), subclavian (7 [25%]), axillary (6 [22%]), iliac (3 [11%]), and femoral/popliteal (9 [32%]). Findings consistent with injury on imaging included pseudoaneurysms (9 [32%]), extravasations (9 [32%]), occlusions (6 [22%]), and arteriovenous fistulas (4 [14%]). Technical success was achieved in all patients. The overall complication rate was 21%, with six patients requiring a secondary procedure. Two patients underwent a planned, elective conversion to open repair during the initial hospitalization. Four patients required conversion secondary to stent graft thrombosis. Three conversions were early (<30 days) and one was late (>30 days). The mean length of stay was 18.4 ± 22.9 days (range, 1-93 days), with a median follow-up of 13 months (range, 1-60 months). The overall limb salvage rate was 92% at 45 days and 79% at 93 days.ConclusionsThe present study outlines our early experience with endovascular repair of peripheral arterial injuries in a variety of anatomic locations. Overall complication rates are appreciable but can be effectively detected and managed with additional intervention. The inclusion of endovascular modalities in algorithms of trauma care holds considerable promise. The need to better define optimal algorithms for utilization and determine long-term outcomes of intervention requires significant additional study