Geoenvironmental Site Characterization to Treatment: Lead Contaminated Firing Range Case Study

The methodologies employed and the results obtained during the performance of a comprehensive geoenvironmental site characterization case study are presented. The study demonstrates the need to integrate research tools from various disciplines including geotechnical, analytical and mineralogical specialties in order to develop a thorough understanding of both the nature and extent of the environmental issues associated with the site and the most viable alternatives for its remediation. Particle size distribution coupled with contaminant fractionation studies and mineralogical and micromorphological analyses were performed on the soil samples collected onsite to identify the metals present, their concentrations and the mechanisms of transformation. Lead fragments found in the soil samples were analyzed by means of X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Quantitative phase analysis studies showed that the fine soil fractions contained considerable amounts of lead carbonates, which owing to their colloidal nature could not be readily removed using gravitational methods. To mitigate this deficiency, a bench-scale chemical treatment experiment based on dissolution of the Pb was performed. Although the study is still in progress, the benefits derived from using the multi-disciplinary approach for site characterization described herein warrant consideration by others who may face similar challenges in the future

Nanomaterials application for heavy metals recovery from polluted water: The combination of nano zero-valent iron and carbon nanotubes. Competitive adsorption non-linear modeling

Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs) and nano Zero-Valent Iron (nZVI) particles, as well as two nanocomposites based on these novel nanomaterials, were employed as nano-adsorbents for the removal of hexavalent chromium, selenium and cobalt, from aqueous solutions. Nanomaterials characterization included the determination of their point of zero charge and particle size distribution. CNTs were further analyzed using scanning electron microscopy, thermogravimetric analysis and Raman spectroscopy to determine their morphology and structural properties. Batch experiments were carried out to investigate the removal efficiency and the possible competitive interactions among metal ions. Adsorption was found to be the main removal mechanism, except for Cr(VI) treatment by nZVI, where reduction was the predominant mechanism. The removal efficiency was estimated in decreasing order as CNTs-nZVI > nZVI > CNTs > CNTs-nZVI* independently upon the tested heavy metal. In the case of competitive adsorption, Cr(VI) exhibited the highest affinity for every adsorbent. The preferable Cr(VI) removal was also observed using binary systems of the tested metals by means of the CNTs-nZVI nanocomposite. Single species adsorption was better described by the non-linear Sips model, whilst competitive adsorption followed the modified Langmuir model. The CNTs-nZVI nanocomposite was tested for its reusability, and showed high adsorption efficiency (the qmax values decreased less than 50% with respect to the first use) even after three cycles of use

Microstructural analyses of Cr(VI) speciation in chromite ore processing Residue (COPR)

The speciation and distribution of Cr(VI) in the solid phase was investigated for two types of chromite ore processing residue (COPR) found at two deposition sites in the United States: gray-black (GB) granular and hard brown (HB) cemented COPR. COPR chemistry and mineralogy were investigated using micro-X-ray absorption spectroscopy and micro-X-ray diffraction, complemented by laboratory analyses. GB COPR contained 30percent of its total Cr(VI) (6000 mg/kg) as large crystals(>20 ?m diameter) of a previously unreported Na-rich analog of calcium aluminum chromate hydrates. These Cr(VI)-rich phases are thought to be vulnerable to reductive and pH treatments. More than 50percent of the Cr(VI) was located within nodules, not easily accessible to dissolved reductants, and bound to Fe-rich hydrogarnet, hydrotalcite, and possibly brucite. These phases are stable over a large pH range, thus harder to dissolve. Brownmilleritewasalso likely associated with physical entrapment of Cr(VI) in the interior of nodules. HB COPR contained no Cr(VI)-rich phases; all Cr(VI) was diffuse within the nodules and absent from the cementing matrix, with hydrogarnet and hydrotalcite being the main Cr(VI) binding phases. Treatment ofHBCOPRis challenging in terms of dissolving the acidity-resistant, inaccessible Cr(VI) compounds; the same applies to ~;;50percent of Cr(VI) in GB COPR