10 research outputs found

    Neural Substrate Expansion for the Restoration of Brain Function

    Get PDF
    Restoring neurological and cognitive function in individuals who have suffered brain damage is one of the principal objectives of modern translational neuroscience. Electrical stimulation approaches, such as deep-brain stimulation, have achieved the most clinical success, but they ultimately may be limited by the computational capacity of the residual cerebral circuitry. An alternative strategy is brain substrate expansion, in which the computational capacity of the brain is augmented through the addition of new processing units and the reconstitution of network connectivity. This latter approach has been explored to some degree using both biological and electronic means but thus far has not demonstrated the ability to reestablish the function of large-scale neuronal networks. In this review, we contend that fulfilling the potential of brain substrate expansion will require a significant shift from current methods that emphasize direct manipulations of the brain (e.g., injections of cellular suspensions and the implantation of multi-electrode arrays) to the generation of more sophisticated neural tissues and neural-electric hybrids in vitro that are subsequently transplanted into the brain. Drawing from neural tissue engineering, stem cell biology, and neural interface technologies, this strategy makes greater use of the manifold techniques available in the laboratory to create biocompatible constructs that recapitulate brain architecture and thus are more easily recognized and utilized by brain networks

    Colloids as Mobile Substrates for the Implantation and Integration of Differentiated Neurons into the Mammalian Brain

    Get PDF
    Neuronal degeneration and the deterioration of neuronal communication lie at the origin of many neuronal disorders, and there have been major efforts to develop cell replacement therapies for treating such diseases. One challenge, however, is that differentiated cells are challenging to transplant due to their sensitivity both to being uprooted from their cell culture growth support and to shear forces inherent in the implantation process. Here, we describe an approach to address these problems. We demonstrate that rat hippocampal neurons can be grown on colloidal particles or beads, matured and even transfected in vitro, and subsequently transplanted while adhered to the beads into the young adult rat hippocampus. The transplanted cells have a 76% cell survival rate one week post-surgery. At this time, most transplanted neurons have left their beads and elaborated long processes, similar to the host neurons. Additionally, the transplanted cells distribute uniformly across the host hippocampus. Expression of a fluorescent protein and the light-gated glutamate receptor in the transplanted neurons enabled them to be driven to fire by remote optical control. At 1-2 weeks after transplantation, calcium imaging of host brain slice shows that optical excitation of the transplanted neurons elicits activity in nearby host neurons, indicating the formation of functional transplant-host synaptic connections. After 6 months, the transplanted cell survival and overall cell distribution remained unchanged, suggesting that cells are functionally integrated. This approach, which could be extended to other cell classes such as neural stem cells and other regions of the brain, offers promising prospects for neuronal circuit repair via transplantation of in vitro differentiated, genetically engineered neurons

    Protocol for human brain organoid transplantation into a rat visual cortex to model neural repair

    No full text
    Summary: Human stem-cell-derived organoids represent a promising substrate for transplantation-based neural repair. Here, we describe a protocol for transplanting forebrain organoids into an injured adult rat visual cortex. This protocol includes surgical details for craniectomy, aspiration injury, organoid transplantation, and cranioplasty. This platform represents a valuable tool for investigating the efficacy of organoids as structured grafts for neural repair.For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Jgamadze et al.1 : Publisher’s note: Undertaking any experimental protocol requires adherence to local institutional guidelines for laboratory safety and ethics

    Long-term integration of the transplanted neurons.

    No full text
    <p>Confocal microscopy images extracted from xyz-tile acquisitions showing GFP+ neuron implantation throughout the hippocampus 24 weeks post-transplantation. <b>a</b>) shows beads at the injection site carrying GFP+ neurons which are projecting their processes in the host hippocampus, <b>b</b>) shows neurons in Or -oriens layer of the hippocampus sending out processes through the radiatum layer, and <b>c</b>) shows cells in the stratum lucidum of the CA3. Brain slices were stained with CD11b a marker for microglia cells (<b>d</b>), and CD68 a marker for macrophages (<b>e</b>). Confocal microscopy images 4 xy frames extracted from xyz-tile acquisitions showing glass bead cluster were projected in z. Increase in microglia cells and macrophages was associated with the presence of GFP+ cells without processes (arrows). Beads without cells were free of microglia and macrophages, suggesting that these cells were there to clear non-integrated GFP+ neurons. All scale bars  =  100 µm.</p

    Development and manipulation of neurons supported on silica beads.

    No full text
    <p>Confocal microscopy z series are projected on the xy scanning plane. E18 hippocampal neurons cultured seeded at 4k cells/cm<sup>2</sup> on 125 µm (<b>a-c</b>), and on 45 µm (<b>d-f</b>) PLL coated beads shown at DIV 4. Cells were fixed and stained with a neuron specific alphãtubulin antibody (green), and with an axon specific smi-312 antibody (red). Neurons were polarized in both preparations independently of bead radius of curvature. The number of neurons per bead is proportional to bead surface area, as 45 µm beads carried on average one cell, and 125 µm beads carried about 10 cells. (<b>g</b>) Bright field image of neurons seeded at 100k cells/cm<sup>2</sup> on 45 µm beads at DIV 4. (<b>h</b>) Cells were fixed and stained with a neuron specific Tuj-1 antibody (red), and the nuclear marker DAPI (blue). Twenty-one of the twenty-five cells on this bead are Tuj-1 positive. At this high density, cells in direct contact with the bead surface wrap their processes around the beads (highlighted in red) while the others sit on this layer (highlighted in blue) as illustrated in the color-coded picture (<b>i</b>). All Scale bars  =  50 µm.</p

    Influence of the injection position on the distribution of the implanted GFP-neurons.

    No full text
    <p><b>a)</b> Schematic representation of the different hippocampus sub-regions. CA1-field SLu- stratum lucidum, Rad- radiatum layer of the hippocampus, PoDG- polymorph layer of the dentate gyrus, GrDG- granular layer of the dentate gyrus, MoDG- molecular layer of the dentate gyrus, LMol- lacunosum moleculare layer of the hippocampus, Py - pyramidal cell layer of the hippocampus, and Or -oriens layer of the hippocampus. Confocal microscopy images extracted from xyz-tile acquisitions showing GFP+ neuron implantation through out the hippocampus: <b>b</b>) shows the radiatum layer, <b>c</b>) the stratum lucidum of the CA3, <b>d</b>) part of the dentate gyrus. <b>f</b>) Fraction of the total GFP+ cells found in each region for injections in the CA3 (blue) and in the DG (red). Error bars represent the standard deviations for series of 10 animals. Scale bars  =  100 µm.</p

    Transplanted neurons in the adult rat hippocampus.

    No full text
    <p>DIV 5 GFP-neurons were injected unilaterally into the right hippocampus of 6 weeks old rats using 45 µm bead carriers. <b>a</b>) Schematic representation showing the injection location in the dentate gyrus (DG), and in the CA3 region (CA3). After a week the animals were sacrificed and their brains were sliced and immuno-stained with GFP antibody (green) and with Nissl (red) a nuclear cell marker. <b>b</b>) Fluorescence microscopy image of a brain slice taken at the injection site (scale bar  =  1 mm). Fields extracted from a XYZ-tile scan of the hippocampus, −3.7 mm A/P from the bregma, showing the extent of the transplanted neuron implantation in <b>c</b>) the CA3 stratum lucidum layer. <b>d</b>) Cross-section of a bead carrying two GFP+ neurons sending processes into the hippocampus in a 150 µm thick slice. <b>e</b>) A rare GFP+ neuron found in the brain section after dissociation from 2D support prior to injection. Scale bar  =  50 µm. Anterio-posterior GFP+ neuron distribution for injections made at [AP] = −3.5 in the CA3 (blue) and in the DG (red). <b>f</b>) shows the average number of GFP+ neuron (N<sub>GFP-cell</sub>), and <b>g</b>) shows the average number of GFP-neuron (N<sub>GFP-cell</sub>) per mm<sup>3</sup>. Error bars represent the standard deviations for series of 10 animals.</p

    Functional integration of transplanted neurons.

    No full text
    <p><b>a</b>) Live confocal imaging of calcium response in a hippocampal slice containing a transplanted LiGluR6 neuron expressing GFP <b>b</b>) and labeled with a calcium indicator, Rhod-2 <b>c</b>). Panel <b>d</b>) shows an overlay of both channels. Scale bar  = 100 µm. LiGluR6 cell was stimulated by short exposure to 390nm light for a short period of time and we recorded the calcium response of the surrounding neurons. <b>a</b>) shows calcium variation of individual cells (single pixel) after binning (3x3) and subtraction of the fluorescence background. Response was color-coded using a rainbow scale. Corresponding fluorescence intensity changes during UV stimulation are shown in panel <b>e</b>). All neurons in the slice responded to the stimulation indicating that the transplanted cell has made functional connections with the surrounding neurons. For 6 neurons distributed above (labeled <i>a b c</i>) and below (labeled <i>1 2 3</i>) the transplanted cell we calculated ΔF/F for seven UV stimulations <b>f</b>). ΔF/F of the LiGluR6 neuron remains around 30% (+/−2.5%). (a<i>bc</i>) neurons have, in average, higher ΔF/F than the stimulated neurons with significant variations from one exposure to the next, while (1 2 3) neurons have, in average, a smaller ΔF/F.</p
    corecore