11 research outputs found

    Influence of superionic nanoparticles Cu₆PSβ‚…I on dielectric properties of nematic liquid crystal 6БНВВ

    No full text
    Within the frequency range 10…10⁢ Hz, the influence of Cu₆PSβ‚…I nanoparticles on the dielectric properties of planar oriented liquid crystal 6БНВВ has been studied. It has been shown that nanoparticles lead to an increase in conductivity, but the conductivity dependence on concentration is non-monotonic function. It has been suggested that the reason of non-monotonic dependence of conductivity of 6БНВВ on the concentration of nanoparticles is significant influence of ion adsorption on the nanoparticle surface and increase in the viscosity of liquid crystal when introducing nanoparticles

    ΠšΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎ-экономичСский Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· лСчСния взрослых ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с тяТСлой аллСргичСской ΡΠΎΠ·ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π±Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Ρ…ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ астмой: ΠΌΠ΅ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΠΌΠ°Π± ΠΈ ΠΎΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΠΌΠ°Π±

    No full text
    Objective: Based on the cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) to determine economic and clinical consequences of using mepolizumab instead of omalizumab in adults with severe eosinophilic asthma, when omalizumab is administered once every 2 weeks or mepolizumab is administered once every 4 weeks. Methods: Effectiveness and safety analysis was conducted based on the published network meta-analysis, because head-to-head clinical trials of omalizumab versus mepolizumab were not identified during targeted scientific literature search. Direct medical costs were calculated using information from the register of manufacturers' maximum selling prices for vital and essential drugs (VED), instructions for medical use, the unit cost of healthcare services. Results: Effectiveness and safety of the compared drugs were determined based on the results of the network meta-analysis. Frequency of clinically significant asthma exacerbations (risk ratio = 0,19; 95% CI: 0,02-2,32) and withdrawals due to adverse events (risk ratio = 0,05; 95% CI: 0,002-0,95). Therefore, despite the tendency to mepolisumab benefits, it was concluded that there are no statistically significant differences in the effectiveness and safety of the compared drugs due to the insufficient statistical power of the result. Direct medical costs were 870130 rubles and 1852063 rubles for mepolizumab and omalizumab respectively. Saving of direct medical costs for mepolizumab treatment was 959170 rubles per patient per year or 52%. Conclusion: treatment with mepolizumab versus omalizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, when omalizumab is administered once every 2 weeks or mepolizumab is administered once every 4 weeks, leads to saving of direct medical costs for drug treatment.ЦСль: На основании Ρ†Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π°ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-экономичСского исслСдования (КЭИ) Π²Ρ‹ΡΠ²ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ экономичСскиС ΠΈ клиничСскиС послСдствия примСнСния ΠΌΠ΅ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΠΌΠ°Π±Π° вмСсто ΠΎΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΠΌΠ°Π±Π° Ρƒ взрослых ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с тяТСлой ΡΠΎΠ·ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ аллСргичСской Π±Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Ρ…ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ астмой (БА), ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹ΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ Π±Ρ‹Ρ‚ΡŒ Π½Π°Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π΅Π½ ΠΎΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΠΌΠ°Π± Π² Ρ€Π΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΠ΅ 1 Ρ€Π°Π· Π² Π΄Π²Π΅ Π½Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΠΌΠ°Π± Π² Ρ€Π΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΠ΅ 1 Ρ€Π°Π· Π² 4 Π½Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ. ΠœΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°: Анализ эффСктивности ΠΈ бСзопасности Π±Ρ‹Π» ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ Π½Π° основании ΠΎΠΏΡƒΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ сСтСвого ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°-Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°, Ρ‚Π°ΠΊ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ прямыС ΡΡ€Π°Π²Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Π΅ исслСдования ΠΎΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΠΌΠ°Π±Π° ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΠΌΠ°Π±Π° Π½Π΅ Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ выявлСны Π² Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ Ρ†Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π°ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π½Π°ΡƒΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ поиска. Π‘ΡƒΠΌΠΌΠ° прямых мСдицинских Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ Π±Ρ‹Π»Π° ΠΎΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π° Π½Π° основании ΠΈΠ½Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ· рССстра ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… отпускных Ρ†Π΅Π½ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΡ‹Ρ… ΠΈ Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½Π΅ΠΉΡˆΠΈΡ… лСкарствСнных ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² (Π–ΠΠ’Π›ΠŸ), инструкций ΠΏΠΎ мСдицинскому ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ, Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ² финансовых Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ Π½Π° Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ†Ρƒ объСма мСдицинской ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ‰ΠΈ. Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹: На основании Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² сСтСвого ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°-Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° Π±Ρ‹Π»Π° ΠΎΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π° ΡΡ„Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΈ Π±Π΅Π·ΠΎΠΏΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ сравниваСмых лСкарствСнных ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ². Частота клиничСски Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΡ‹Ρ… обострСний БА (ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ рисков = 0,19; 95% Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΉ ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π²Π°Π»-Π”Π˜: 0,02-2.32) ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΊΡ€Π°Ρ‰Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ·-Π·Π° Π½Π΅ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… явлСний (ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ рисков = 0,05; 95% Π”Π˜: 0,002-0,95). Π’Π°ΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΎΠΌ, нСсмотря Π½Π° Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ†ΠΈΡŽ ΠΊ прСимущСствам ΠΌΠ΅ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΠΌΠ°Π±Π°, Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΎ сдСлано Π·Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠ± отсутствии статистичСски Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΡ‹Ρ… Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠΉ Π² эффСктивности ΠΈ бСзопасности ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρƒ 74 сравниваСмыми лСкарствСнными ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ½Π΅ нСдостаточной статистичСской мощности ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ…. Π‘ΡƒΠΌΠΌΠ° прямых мСдицинских Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ составила 870 130 Ρ€ΡƒΠ±. ΠΈ 1 852 063 Ρ€ΡƒΠ±. для ΠΌΠ΅ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΠΌΠ°Π±Π° ΠΈ ΠΎΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΠΌΠ°Π±Π° соотвСтствСнно. Экономия прямых мСдицинских Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΠΌΠ°Π±Π° составила 959 170 Ρ€ΡƒΠ±. Π½Π° ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π° Π² Π³ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ 52%. Π—Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅: ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΠΌΠ°Π±Π° вмСсто ΠΎΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΠΌΠ°Π±Π° Ρƒ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с тяТСлой ΡΠΎΠ·ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ аллСргичСской БА, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹ΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ Π±Ρ‹Ρ‚ΡŒ Π½Π°Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π΅Π½ ΠΎΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΠΌΠ°Π± Π² Ρ€Π΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΠ΅ 1 Ρ€Π°Π· Π² 2 Π½Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΠΌΠ°Π± 1 Ρ€Π°Π· Π² 4 Π½Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ‚ ΠΊ экономии прямых мСдицинских Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ Π½Π° лСкарствСнныС ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹

    Π’Π°ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠ½Π΅Π²ΠΌΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΊΠΊΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΈΠ½Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΉ Ρƒ взрослых. Π Π΅Π·ΠΎΠ»ΡŽΡ†ΠΈΡ совСта экспСртов (Москва, 16 дСкабря 2017 Π³.)

    No full text
    The following key issues of pneumococcal infection prophylaxis were discussed during the expert council: incidence rates of community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia and other pneumococcal infections, local epidemiological data, increases in antimicrobial resistance and pneumococcal serotypes substitution, current international and Russian clinical guidelines, practical approaches, and pneumococcal vaccination coverage of adult population in the Russian Federation. The agreement between the experts about a need to distinguish the use of conjugate vaccines and polysaccharide vaccines in different subpopulations has been achieved.Π’ Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ совСта экспСртов обсуТдСны ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π²Ρ‹Π΅ вопросы ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠ½Π΅Π²ΠΌΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΊΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈ (ПИ): ситуация с Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ Π²Π½Π΅Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ½Π΅Π²ΠΌΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΊΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ½Π΅Π²ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ (Π’ΠŸ) ΠΈ Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΠ³ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ПИ, особСнности локальной эпидСмиологии, роста рСзистСнтности ΠΈ замСщСния ΡˆΡ‚Π°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠ½Π΅Π²ΠΌΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΊΠΊΠ°, ΡΡƒΡ‰Π΅ΡΡ‚Π²ΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡƒΠ½Π°Ρ€ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΈ российскиС клиничСскиС Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ, Ρ‚Π΅ΠΊΡƒΡ‰ΠΈΠ΅ практичСскиС ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹, ΠΎΡ…Π²Π°Ρ‚ Π²Π°ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠ½Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ взрослого насСлСния Π Π€. Π‘Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΡƒΠ»ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ консолидированноС ΠΌΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎ нСобходимости разграничСния использования ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡŠΡŽΠ³ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΈ полисахаридных Π²Π°ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠ½ Π² Ρ€Π°Π·Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΠ°Ρ… насСлСния

    Severe bronchial asthma patient care organization in various regions of the Russian Federation. From endotypes and phenotypes of bronchial asthma to personalized choice of therapy

    No full text
    Β© 2020 Consilium Medikum. All rights reserved. The meeting of the Expert board was held in Moscow on June 24, 2019, at which the following issues were considered: the applicability of a new terminology characterizing asthma endotypes and phenotypes in real clinical practice, the effect of phenotypes and biomarkers in patients with bronchial asthma on the choice of biological drug, as well as the optimal clinical profiles of patients for whom dupilumab is most effective, taking into account the data of the III phase clinical trials, regional features of medical care and changes in updated international clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of asthma. The Expert board included members of leading Russian scientific and educational medical institutions: S.N. Avdeev, corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, prof., MD; O.A. Volkova, Ph.D.; I.V. Demko, prof., MD; G.L. Ignatova, prof., MD; I.V. Leshchenko, prof., MD; Kanukova N.A.; Kudelya L.M., prof., MD; V.A. Nevzorova, prof., MD; N.G. Nedashkovskaya; O.P. Ukhanova, prof., MD; L.V. Shulzhenko, prof., MD; R.S. Fassakhov, prof., MD

    Π’Π°ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠ½Π΅Π²ΠΌΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΊΠΊΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΈΠ½Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΉ Ρƒ взрослых. Π Π΅Π·ΠΎΠ»ΡŽΡ†ΠΈΡ совСта экспСртов (Москва, 16 дСкабря 2017 Π³.)

    No full text
    The following key issues of pneumococcal infection prophylaxis were discussed during the expert council: incidence rates of community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia and other pneumococcal infections, local epidemiological data, increases in antimicrobial resistance and pneumococcal serotypes substitution, current international and Russian clinical guidelines, practical approaches, and pneumococcal vaccination coverage of adult population in the Russian Federation. The agreement between the experts about a need to distinguish the use of conjugate vaccines and polysaccharide vaccines in different subpopulations has been achieved.Π’ Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ совСта экспСртов обсуТдСны ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π²Ρ‹Π΅ вопросы ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠ½Π΅Π²ΠΌΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΊΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈ (ПИ): ситуация с Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ Π²Π½Π΅Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ½Π΅Π²ΠΌΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΊΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ½Π΅Π²ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ (Π’ΠŸ) ΠΈ Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΠ³ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ПИ, особСнности локальной эпидСмиологии, роста рСзистСнтности ΠΈ замСщСния ΡˆΡ‚Π°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠ½Π΅Π²ΠΌΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΊΠΊΠ°, ΡΡƒΡ‰Π΅ΡΡ‚Π²ΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡƒΠ½Π°Ρ€ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΈ российскиС клиничСскиС Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ, Ρ‚Π΅ΠΊΡƒΡ‰ΠΈΠ΅ практичСскиС ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹, ΠΎΡ…Π²Π°Ρ‚ Π²Π°ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠ½Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ взрослого насСлСния Π Π€. Π‘Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΡƒΠ»ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ консолидированноС ΠΌΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎ нСобходимости разграничСния использования ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡŠΡŽΠ³ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΈ полисахаридных Π²Π°ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠ½ Π² Ρ€Π°Π·Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΠ°Ρ… насСлСния

    Practical recommendations for choosing an immunobiological preparation for the treatment of severe bronchial asthma of T2-endotype

    No full text
    Β© 2020 Medical Education. All rights reserved. Biological therapy of bronchial asthma (BA) is a modern method of treating severe forms of the disease, that are uncontrolled by traditional pharmacotherapeutic approaches. Currently, 5 monoclonal antibody (AT) preparations are registered in the world for the treatment of severe bronchial asthma (SBA) of the T2 endotype (T2-SBA) - antibodies, binding to immunoglobulin (Ig) E (anti-IgE - omalizumab), interleukin antagonists (IL)-5 (anti-IL-5 - mepolizumab, resizumab) and its receptor (anti-IL-5RΞ± - benralizumab), as well as antibodies, that selectively bind to the IL-4 and -13 receptor (anti-IL-4 /13RΞ± - dupilumab). The article presents data on the effectiveness of these drugs in relation to the key characteristics of SBA, formulates clinical and laboratory criteria, the study of which in real practice can potentially predict the likelihood of a clinical response to a particular type of biological therapy. An algorithm is proposed for choosing a targeted therapy strategy for patients with SBA, clinically associated with allergies, for patients with severe non-allergic eosinophilic BA and for patients with eosinophilic BA of a combined phenotype
    corecore