30 research outputs found
NMR screening of potential inhibitors of methionine Ξ³-lyase from Citrobacter freundii
Β© 2014, Pleiades Publishing, Inc. Methionine Ξ³-lyase [EC 4.4.1.11] participates in methionine catabolism in a number of bacteria and protozoa eukaryotes, including pathogenic microorganisms. The lack of this enzyme in mammals allows us consider it to be a promising target for rational antibacterial drug design. Currently, in medical practice, there are no preparations based on the inhibition of methionine Ξ³-lyase. We present the results of a search for potential inhibitors of this enzyme using NMR screening techniques based on the identification of compounds, which are able to bind specifically to their biological target. The study included a stage of in silico virtual screening of the library of commercially available compounds and subsequent experimental selection of the leading compounds capable to interact with the enzyme. The identification of binding was carried out using saturation transfer difference (STD) spectroscopy and the WaterLOGSY technique. During the final stage, an experimental assessment of the inhibition activity of the selected compounds in the reaction of the Ξ³ elimination of L-methionine catalyzed by methionine Ξ³-lyase was performed. Binding constants of two leading compounds were determined using the WaterLOGSY method. This study expands the structural group of potential inhibitors of methionine Ξ³-lyase and allows us to approach the design of its inhibitors with higher efficacy
ΠΠ‘ΠΠΠΠ¬ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠ‘ΠΠΠ ΠΠΠ― ΠΠΠΠ«Π¨ΠΠΠΠ― ΠΠ ΠΠ’ΠΠΠΠΠΠ£Π₯ΠΠΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠ’ΠΠΠΠΠ‘Π’Π ΠΠΠ’ΠΠΠΠΠ-ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ« ΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠΠ―Π₯ ΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ«Π₯ ΠΠΠ£Π₯ΠΠΠΠ ΠΠ«Π¨ΠΠ
We presented results of monotherapy and combination therapy of transplantable murine tumor models using methionine-gamma-lyase (MGL) and pyridoxine hydrochloride. We studied MGL from Clostridium sporogenes and Citrobacter freundii. We used Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC), melanoma B16, leukemias P388 and L1210 and Fisher lymphadenosis L5178y. Neither monotherapy with MGL nor combination of MGL and pyridoxine demonstrated antitumor activity against P388 and L5178y. In the murine L1210 leukemia model, MGL C. sporogenes injected intraperitoneally in the dose of 2000 U/kg, 11 times with a 12-hour interval increased the life span of mice (ILS=22 %, Ρ=0.035). In the LLC model, the combination of MGL C. sporogenes at a dose of 400 U/kg, i.p., 4 times with a 48-hour interval and pyridoxine at a dose of 250 mg/kg led to tumor growth inhibition (TGI=55 %, Ρ<0.001) on the first day after the completion of treatment. Monotherapy with MGL or pyridoxine in the same regimens resulted in a 24 % TGI (Ρ=0.263) or 21 % TGI (Ρ=0.410), respectively. In a pair-wise comparison of treatments, MGL + pyridoxine was more effective compared to MGL used alone (Ρ=0.061) and MGL + pyridoxine was more effective then pyridoxine alone (Ρ=0.031). MGL from C. freundii at a dose of 200 U/kg, 4 times with a 48-hour interval plus pyridoxine at a dose of 500 mg/kg injected on day 9 after the completion of treatment led to 50 % TGI, whereas MGL monotherapy at a single dose of 400 U/kg or pyridoxine monotherapy in the same regimen showed 5 % TGI (Ρ=0.991) and 4 % TGI (Ρ=0.998), respectively. The pair-wise comparison showed that MGL (200 U/kg) + pyridoxine was more effective than MGL (400 U/ kg) alone (Ρ<0.001) and pyridoxine alone (Ρ=0.003). In the B16 model, the combination of MGL injected i.p at a dose of 2000 U/kg and pyridoxine at a dose of 300 mg/kg showed 56 % TGI on day 1after the completion of treatment (Ρ=0.045) and 35 % TGI on day 3 (Ρ=0.038). Pyridoxine significantly increased the anticancer effect of MGL: MGL 1000 U/kg i.p and MGL 1000 U/kg i.p. + pyridoxine 300 mg/kg led to TGI=45 % (Ρ=0.034) on day 3 after the completion of treatment. Single maximum tolerated dose after multiple i.p. administration was defined as 2000 U/kg, simultaneous administration of pyridoxine did not increase the toxicity of MGL. In conclusion, LLC and B16 are sensitive to MGL treatment, and pyridoxine may increase the efficacy of MGL.ΠΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΠΌΡΡ
ΠΎΠΏΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΌΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠ½-Ξ³-Π»ΠΈΠ°Π·Ρ (ΠΠΠ) ΠΈ ΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ½Π° Π³ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠΎΡ
Π»ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΄Π°. ΠΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΠΠ Clostridium sporogenes ΠΈ Citrobacter freundii. ΠΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΠΌΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΌΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ: ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠ° Π»Π΅Π³ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΡΡΠΈΡ (LLC), ΠΌΠ΅Π»Π°Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ° Π16, Π»ΠΈΠΌΡΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉΠΊΠΎΠ· P388, Π»ΠΈΠΌΡΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉΠΊΠΎΠ· L1210, Π»ΠΈΠΌΡΠ°Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ· Π€ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ° L5178y. ΠΠ° ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΡ
P388, L5178y ΠΠΠ Π½Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΎΠΏΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½ΠΈ Π² ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΠ΅, Π½ΠΈ Π² ΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Ρ ΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ. ΠΠ° ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ L1210 Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ (Π£ΠΠ) 22 %, Ρ=0,035 ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΠΠ C. sporogenes Π² Π΄ΠΎΠ·Π΅ 2000 Π/ΠΊΠ³ 11-ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΠ±ΡΡΡΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΎ Ρ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²Π°Π»ΠΎΠΌ 12 Ρ. ΠΠ° LLC ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ Π½Π° 1-Π΅ ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΠ±ΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ (Π²/Π±) Π²Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΠΠ C. sporogenes 400 Π/ΠΊΠ³ 4-ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎ Ρ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²Π°Π»ΠΎΠΌ 48 Ρ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ½Π° Π² Π΄ΠΎΠ·Π΅ 250 ΠΌΠ³/ΠΊΠ³ Π²ΡΠ·ΡΠ²Π°Π»ΠΎ Π’Π Π=55 % (Ρ<0,001), ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡ ΠΠΠ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π² Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π΄ΠΎΠ·Π°Ρ
ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΠ°Ρ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π²ΡΠ·ΡΠ²Π°Π»Π° Π’Π Π=24 % (Ρ=0,263) ΠΈ 21 % (Ρ=0,410) ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ. ΠΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ: ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡ ΠΠΠ + ΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ½ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΠΠ Π² Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΠ΅ Ρ=0,061, ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Ρ=0,031. ΠΠ° LLC ΠΠΠ C. freundii 200 Π/ΠΊΠ³ 4-ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎ Ρ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²Π°Π»ΠΎΠΌ 48 Ρ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ½Π° Π² Π΄ΠΎΠ·Π΅ 500 ΠΌΠ³/ΠΊΠ³ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ Π½Π° 9-Π΅ ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π²ΡΠ·ΡΠ²Π°Π»ΠΎ Π’Π Π=50 % (Ρ=0,001), ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡ ΠΠΠ Π² ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΎΠ·Π΅ 400 Π/ΠΊΠ³ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π² Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π²ΡΠ·ΡΠ²Π°Π»Π° Π’Π Π=+5 % (Ρ=0,991) ΠΈ 4 % (Ρ=0,998) ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ. ΠΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ: ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡ ΠΠΠ 200 Π/ΠΊΠ³ + ΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ½ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΠΠ 400 Π/ΠΊΠ³ Π² Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΠ΅ Ρ<0,001, ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Ρ=0,003. ΠΠ° ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Π»Π°Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ° B16 ΠΠΠ 2000 Π²/Π± + ΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ½ 300 ΠΌΠ³/ΠΊΠ³ Π²ΡΠ·ΡΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ Π’Π Π 56 % Π½Π° 1-Π΅ ΡΡΡ (Ρ=0,045) ΠΈ 35 % Π½Π° 3-ΠΈ ΡΡΡ (Ρ=0,038). ΠΡΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΠΠ + ΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ½ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ°Π» ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΎΠΏΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²ΡΡ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΠΠ Π² ΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΡ
: ΠΠΠ 1000 Π/ΠΊΠ³ Π²/Π± ΠΈ ΠΠΠ 1000 Π/ΠΊΠ³ Π²/Π± + ΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ½ 300 ΠΌΠ³/ΠΊΠ³ Π’Π Π=45 % (Ρ=0,034) Π½Π° 3-ΠΈ ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΡΠΈ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ Π²Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΠΠ 500 Π/ΠΊΠ³ ΠΈ ΠΠΠ 500 Π/ΠΊΠ³ + ΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ½ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ°Π» ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ: ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Π’Π Π 50 % Π½Π° 1-Π΅ ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ (Ρ=0,085, ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π΅ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎ) ΠΈ 21 % Π½Π° 3-ΠΈ ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π’Π Π 22 % (Ρ=0,965, ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π΅ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎ).Π Π°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Ρ Π΄ΠΎΠ·Π° ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π²/Π± Π²Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»Π° 2000 Π/ΠΊΠ³, ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ½Π° Π½Π΅ ΡΡΡΠ³ΡΠ±Π»ΡΠ»ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΠΠ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠΌ, LLC ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Π»Π°Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ° Π16 ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°Π΄Π°ΡΡ ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΊ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΠΠ. ΠΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π²Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ½Π° Π½Π° ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ LLC ΠΈ Π16 Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ°Π΅Ρ Π΅Ρ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ
Structure of methionine gamma lyase from Clostridium sporogenes
Methionine Ξ³-lyase (MGL) is a pyridoxal 5β²-phosphate-dependent enzyme that catalyzes the Ξ³-elimination reaction of l-methionine. The enzyme is a promising target for therapeutic intervention in some anaerobic pathogens and has attracted interest as a potential cancer treatment. The crystal structure of MGL from Clostridium sporogenes has been determined at 2.37β
Γ
resolution. The fold of the protein is similar to those of homologous enzymes from Citrobacter freundii, Entamoeba histolytica, Pseudomonas putida and Trichomonas vaginalis. A comparison of these structures revealed differences in the conformation of two flexible regions of the N- and C-terminal domains involved in the active-site architecture
High-resolution structure of methionine gamma-lyase from Citrobacter freundii
Pyridoxal 5'-phosphate-dependent methionine gamma-lyase (MGL) is involved in the metabolism of sulfur-containing amino acids. The enzyme is a promising target in some anaerobic pathogens and is effective in cancer-cell treatment. The structure of the MGL holoenzyme from Citrobacter freundii has previously been determined at 1.9 A resolution. By modification of the crystallization procedure, the previously determined structure of C. freundii MGL has been improved to 1.35 A resolution with R and R(free) values of 0.152 and 0.177, respectively. This high-resolution structure makes it possible to analyze the interactions between the monomers in detail and to reveal the structurally invariant regions that are responsible for monomer-monomer recognition during the formation of the active enzyme. Details of the mode of cofactor binding and of the flexible regions that may be involved in substrate recognition and binding are also described
NMR screening of potential inhibitors of methionine Ξ³-lyase from Citrobacter freundii
Β© 2014, Pleiades Publishing, Inc. Methionine Ξ³-lyase [EC 4.4.1.11] participates in methionine catabolism in a number of bacteria and protozoa eukaryotes, including pathogenic microorganisms. The lack of this enzyme in mammals allows us consider it to be a promising target for rational antibacterial drug design. Currently, in medical practice, there are no preparations based on the inhibition of methionine Ξ³-lyase. We present the results of a search for potential inhibitors of this enzyme using NMR screening techniques based on the identification of compounds, which are able to bind specifically to their biological target. The study included a stage of in silico virtual screening of the library of commercially available compounds and subsequent experimental selection of the leading compounds capable to interact with the enzyme. The identification of binding was carried out using saturation transfer difference (STD) spectroscopy and the WaterLOGSY technique. During the final stage, an experimental assessment of the inhibition activity of the selected compounds in the reaction of the Ξ³ elimination of L-methionine catalyzed by methionine Ξ³-lyase was performed. Binding constants of two leading compounds were determined using the WaterLOGSY method. This study expands the structural group of potential inhibitors of methionine Ξ³-lyase and allows us to approach the design of its inhibitors with higher efficacy
NMR screening of potential inhibitors of methionine Ξ³-lyase from Citrobacter freundii
Β© 2014, Pleiades Publishing, Inc. Methionine Ξ³-lyase [EC 4.4.1.11] participates in methionine catabolism in a number of bacteria and protozoa eukaryotes, including pathogenic microorganisms. The lack of this enzyme in mammals allows us consider it to be a promising target for rational antibacterial drug design. Currently, in medical practice, there are no preparations based on the inhibition of methionine Ξ³-lyase. We present the results of a search for potential inhibitors of this enzyme using NMR screening techniques based on the identification of compounds, which are able to bind specifically to their biological target. The study included a stage of in silico virtual screening of the library of commercially available compounds and subsequent experimental selection of the leading compounds capable to interact with the enzyme. The identification of binding was carried out using saturation transfer difference (STD) spectroscopy and the WaterLOGSY technique. During the final stage, an experimental assessment of the inhibition activity of the selected compounds in the reaction of the Ξ³ elimination of L-methionine catalyzed by methionine Ξ³-lyase was performed. Binding constants of two leading compounds were determined using the WaterLOGSY method. This study expands the structural group of potential inhibitors of methionine Ξ³-lyase and allows us to approach the design of its inhibitors with higher efficacy
High-resolution structure of methionine gamma-lyase from Citrobacter freundii
Pyridoxal 5'-phosphate-dependent methionine gamma-lyase (MGL) is involved in the metabolism of sulfur-containing amino acids. The enzyme is a promising target in some anaerobic pathogens and is effective in cancer-cell treatment. The structure of the MGL holoenzyme from Citrobacter freundii has previously been determined at 1.9 A resolution. By modification of the crystallization procedure, the previously determined structure of C. freundii MGL has been improved to 1.35 A resolution with R and R(free) values of 0.152 and 0.177, respectively. This high-resolution structure makes it possible to analyze the interactions between the monomers in detail and to reveal the structurally invariant regions that are responsible for monomer-monomer recognition during the formation of the active enzyme. Details of the mode of cofactor binding and of the flexible regions that may be involved in substrate recognition and binding are also described