6 research outputs found
Designed vs. Actual Occupant Behaviour in Buildings – A Historical Perspective.
Energy efficiency and actual energy use in buildings depend on various factors. As
building technology, construction quality, climate representation, advanced design tools and
other non-human-related aspects are under scientific investigation and development for many
decades, energy consumption in buildings started to decrease and reached a certain level.
However, the desired net zero or even net positive energy consumption levels are far from reality
yet in many cases. It was found that there is an essential component which is still underestimated
and little researched: humans. Without understanding and appropriately representing building
occupants and their needs in the design process, it seems impossible to estimate real, in-use
energy consumption levels. In the 2nd half of the 20th century, occupant needs and behaviour
were in the centre of many design cases. For example, prefabricated concrete block apartment
buildings that were mass-produced in the Soviet era in Eastern Europe. These residential units
were designed to fit the era’s occupants in all aspects. The purpose of the rigorous design process
was to make sure that the mass-produced buildings will fit well the families moving in. Somewhat
differently, today our goal in occupant-centric design is to improve energy efficiency and to make
sure that occupants have a comfortable and easy-to-use space to live or work. However, the
results and methods applied by our ancestors should be examined and from many aspects their
rigorous occupant-investigations can teach us a lot and can improve our practices today. This
paper analyses the process of module-design of the 50-60’s and their resulting apartment and
occupant type “templates” using documents of the era and interviews with designers and other
participants of that process and highlights the parts that are adaptable to today’s design
practices
Az épülethasználók fi gyelembevétele a magyarországi tervezési gyakorlatban
Napjainkban az Európai Uniós energiapolitikai céloknak is
köszönhetően egyre nagyobb fi gyelem irányul az épületekhez kapcsolódó energiahatékonyság, valamint a belső környezet kérdéskörére. Az e területeken kitűzött célok elérésében
fi gyelmet érdemel egy régi-új kutatási terület: az épülethasználói viselkedés épületenergetikai vizsgálata. Egy nemzetközi projekt keretében szerveződött kutatócsoport a felhasználó-központú tervezés és üzemeltetés jelenlegi gyakorlatainak
felmĂ©rĂ©sĂ©re lĂ©trehozott egy kĂ©rdĹ‘Ăvet, amely az Ă©pĂtĹ‘iparban
dolgozĂł kĂĽlönbözĹ‘ szakágakbĂłl Ă©rkezĹ‘ (pl. Ă©pĂtĂ©sz, Ă©pĂĽletgĂ©pĂ©sz, villamosmĂ©rnök, Ă©pĂĽletautomatika) tervezĹ‘k Ă©s szakemberek rĂ©szĂ©re kerĂĽlt kidolgozásra. A kĂ©rdĹ‘Ăv cĂ©lja az volt, hogy
felmérje az épülethasználók fi gyelembevételének mértékét a
jelenlegi gyakorlat szerinti tervezési és üzemeltetési folyamat
során. Jelen cikkben a magyarországi adatgyűjtĂ©s eredmĂ©nyeit ismertetjĂĽk. Ez alapján megállapĂthatĂł, hogy ma itthon
a szimulációkkal támogatott felhasználó-centrikus tervezés
mĂ©g gyerekcipĹ‘ben jár, amelynek oka leginkább a megbĂzĂłi
oldal költségközpontú szemlélete. A kutatásból kirajzolódik,
hogy az Ă©pĂtĂ©szek többet „tudnak” az Ă©pĂĽlet felhasználĂłirĂłl,
mint például egy gépészeti tanácsadó, vagy tervező, de ez a
mélyebb tudás nem jár együtt változatosabb szimulációs szoftverek alkalmazásával. A kutatási projekt a 12 másik országban folytatott nemzeti felmérések eredményeinek értékelése
után tovább folytatódik. A munka következő lépése a magyarországi adatok összevetése lesz a projektben résztvevő többi
ország eredményeivel
Large scale smart meter data assessment for energy benchmarking and occupant behaviour profile development
This paper will present objectives and first results of the research project entitled “Large Scale Smart Meter Data Assessment for Energy Benchmarking and Occupant Behaviour Profile Development of Building Clusters,” implemented in the geographical scope of Hungary. The project seeks to utilize a new and unique opportunity for accessing and processing an enormous dataset collected by smart meters. Recently in Hungary, nearly 10 000 buildings have been equipped with smart meters within the “Central Smart Grid Pilot Project”. By means of advanced data analysis techniques, consumption trends and motivations of building users are being investigated. The aims are to help building designers and engineers design more energy efficient buildings at lower investment costs by avoiding system oversizing, and to obtain better knowledge about hourly, daily and monthly energy consumption trends. Furthermore, standard net demand values for normative energy calculations can be updated and specified more precisely since consumption habits change with time and depend on the region
Development of electricity consumption profiles of residential buildings based on smart meter data clustering
In the present research, a high-resolution, detailed electric load dataset was assessed, collected by smart
meters from nearly a thousand households in Hungary, many of them single-family houses. The objective
was to evaluate this database in detail to determine energy consumption profiles from time series of daily
and annual electric load. After representativity check of dataset daily and annual energy consumption
profiles were developed, applying three different clustering methods (k-means, fuzzy k-means, agglomerative hierarchical) and three different cluster validity indexes (elbow method, silhouette method, Dunn
index) in MATLAB environment. The best clustering method for our examination proved to be the kmeans clustering technique. Analyses were carried out to identify different consumer groups, as well
as to clarify the impact of specific parameters such as meter type in the housing unit (e.g. peak, offpeak meter), day of the week (e.g. weekend, weekday), seasonality, geographical location, settlement
type and housing type (single-family house, flat, age class of the building). Furthermore, four electric user
profile types were proposed, which can be used for building energy demand simulation, summer heat
load and winter heating demand calculatio
Overview and future challenges of nearly zero-energy building (nZEB) design in Eastern Europe
The European Unions’ ambition for the construction sector is to be carbon neutral by 2030 for new construction. Since 2021, all new buildings in the EU should have been constructed as nearly zero-energy
buildings (nZEB). However, Eastern European countries struggle to implement the 2018 Energy
Performance of Building Directive recast requirements. Next to the economic challenges, equally essential factors hinder renovating the existing residential building stock and adding newly constructed highperformance buildings sourced primarily from renewable energy sources. Therefore, this study provides a
cross-study to identify the barriers to nZEB implementation in ten Eastern European countries, including
Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia. The study
was conducted between 2019 and 2021 and provides an overview of prospects for nZEB in Eastern
Europe. The study examines the challenges of nZEB plans faced in those countries and provides constructive recommendations. The regulations and definitions regarding nZEB energy performance, cooling and
heating energy demand, thermal comfort, onsite renewables, and construction quality were analyzed.
Results show that most Eastern European countries are unprepared to comply with the EPBD guidelines
and cost-optimality approach. The paper ranks each country and recommends specific measures to refine
the nZEB definitions. The paper provides a thorough comparative assessment and benchmarking of select
EU geography that can help shift the identified gaps into opportunities for the future development of
climate-neutral high-performance buildings
Bridging the gap from test rooms to field-tests for human indoor comfort studies: A critical review of the sustainability potential of living laboratories
Occupants play a key role in determining final building energy consumption. Empirical evidence must support
occupants’ modelling. Experiments on human responses to Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) are usually
performed in test rooms or as in-field monitoring. Between these two approaches, living laboratories, often
abbreviated as living labs, represent a valid alternative due to their resemblance to real-world settings. This
allows observing actual behaviours while keeping the capability to reliably monitor and control the indoor
environment. This work systematically reviewed the available information from 34 living labs for human comfort
studies worldwide to define the scope, characteristics, and significance of living labs, for the first time. Most of
the reviewed living labs are office environments, and only a few do not involve a university research institution
in their operation and management. Most of them are in Europe and the United States, whereas there is a lack of
such facilities in other locations and climate zones (e.g., tropics). A larger number of comfort studies in living
labs is required to clarify the differences in the knowledge acquired in these experiments compared to in-field
and laboratory ones. The review shows that living labs add opportunities for testing and optimizing innovations in human-centric solutions for comfortable green buildings. Through the living labs approach it is
possible to holistically capture the influence of IEQ on occupant perception and the related response, to gather
data on larger and more diverse groups of people, and to conduct multi-domain comfort studies involving
multidisciplinary approaches given their real-life settings