Efficacy of Dupilumab in Atopic Dermatitis : The Patient's Perspective

Atopic dermatitis (AD), a predominantly type 2 inflammatory skin disease, affects approximately 2-5% of adults, with a high burden of disease. In moderate-to-severe AD, lesions can be extensive and pruritus intense with patients experiencing skin pain, sleep and mental health disturbances, and diminished quality of life (QoL). The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab for the treatment of AD from the patients' perspective using patient-reported outcome data from four clinical trials (CHRONOS, SOLO 1&2, and CAFÉ) in patients (N = 1553) receiving either the approved 300 mg q2w dupilumab with/without topical corticosteroids (TCS) dose or control (placebo or placebo + TCS). Patient Global Assessment of Disease Status (PGADS) was used to measure patients' well-being and Patient Global Assessment of Treatment Effect (PGATE) was used to measure treatment efficacy. Patients were asked "Considering all the ways in which your eczema affects you, indicate how well you are doing" to assess their perception of well-being and "How would you rate the way your eczema responded to the study medication?" to assess their perception of treatment effect. Possible responses for both metrics included poor, fair, good, very good, and excellent. In all four studies, a significantly higher proportion of dupilumab-treated patients reported "Good"/"Very Good"/"Excellent" disease status from week 2 through study end versus control (CHRONOS, 52 weeks: 69.8% vs. 25.1%; SOLO 1&2, 16 weeks: 59.5% vs. 24.6%; CAFÉ, 16 weeks: 84.1% vs. 45.4%; all P < 0.0001), and significantly more dupilumab-treated patients reported "Good"/"Very Good"/"Excellent" treatment efficacy versus control (CHRONOS: 72.6% vs. 24.8%; SOLO 1&2: 65.0% vs. 21.1%; CAFÉ, 16 weeks: 85.0% vs. 36.1%; all P < 0.0001). Adult patients with AD perceived that dupilumab with/without concomitant TCS was highly efficacious and improved overall disease status and well-being as early as week 2 and throughout treatment periods up to 1 year. The online version of this article (10.1007/s13555-021-00621-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users

Development, Psychometric Validation and Responder Definition of Worst Itch Scale in Children with Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Introduction: Itch associated with atopic dermatitis (AD) has a profoundly negative effect on patients of all ages. Therefore, itch is a main target for AD therapeutic approaches, and treatments are perceived as beneficial when they achieve an itch reduction. In the absence of a validated scale for children aged 6-11 years that is suitable for assessing itch intensity in clinical trial settings, the Worst Itch Scale was developed. Methods: Qualitative interviews, comprising concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing, were conducted to develop and evaluate the content validity of the Worst Itch Scale. Psychometric assessments used data from the LIBERTY AD PEDS phase 3 trial of dupilumab in patients aged 6-11 years with severe AD. These included test-retest reliability, construct validity, known-groups validity and responsiveness. Thresholds for clinically meaningful change were defined using anchor- and distribution-based methods. Results: The Worst Itch Scale consisted of two items asking about 'worst itching' experienced 'last night' and 'today'. Worst Itch Scale scores showed large, positive correlations with existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures of itch, and weaker correlations with clinician-reported outcome (ClinRO) measures assessing objective signs of AD. Improvements in Worst Itch Scale scores were highly correlated with improvements in other itch PROs and moderately correlated with improvements in ClinROs. The responder definition based on the primary anchor, a 1-point improvement in the Patient Global Impression of Disease, was 2.84. Supportive anchors produced response estimates ranging from 2.43 to 4.80 points. Conclusions: The Worst Itch Scale is a fit-forpurpose (e.g. well-defined, reliable, responsive and valid) scale for evaluating worst itch intensity in children aged 6-11 years with severe AD. The within-patient threshold for defining a clinically meaningful response was a >= 3-4-point change in the Worst Itch Scale score

Real-World Effectiveness of Dupilumab in Atopic Dermatitis Patients: Analysis of an Electronic Medical Records Dataset.

IntroductionWhile the efficacy of dupilumab for the treatment of adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) has been demonstrated in several clinical trials, patients in such trials may not necessarily reflect the real-world clinical practice setting. This study evaluated the real-world effectiveness of dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe AD based on physician global assessment, percent body surface area affected, and patient-reported itch.MethodsFrom Modernizing Medicine's Electronic Medical Assistant dermatology-specific electronic medical records, adults (≥ 18&nbsp;years) were identified with a diagnosis of AD and ≥ 1 dupilumab prescription (index event) between 1 April 2017 and 31 January 2019. Three cohorts were identified based on 3-month pre-index (1) Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score ≥ 3, (2) an itch severity numerical rating scale (NRS) score ≥ 3, and (3) body surface area (BSA) affected ≥ 10%. Changes from pre-index on the outcome within each cohort were evaluated at 4&nbsp;months post-index. Patients were also stratified for evaluation of outcomes by baseline demographic (sex, age) and prior AD treatments (topical therapy only or no treatment, any systemic therapy).ResultsMore than 70% of the 435 AD patients with baseline IGA score ≥ 3 improved to an IGA score of ≤ 2 at month 4 post-dupilumab initiation, including 42.8% who achieved IGA 0/1 (clear/minimal). Among 112 patients with a pre-index itch severity NRS ≥ 3, scores were reduced from mean (SD) 7.0 (2.4) pre-index to 2.8 (2.8) at month 4 (p &lt; 0.0001); 70.5% of patients had a reduction ≥ 3 points. In the BSA cohort (n = 387), affected BSA was significantly reduced from a pre-index mean (SD) of 39.3% (26.1%) to 16.3% (21.2%) at month 4 (p &lt; 0.0001). Significant improvements in IGA, itch NRS, and BSA were observed regardless of demographic (age and sex) or clinical characteristics such as treatment history (all p &lt; 0.0001 compared with pre-index).ConclusionsConsistent with outcomes observed in clinical trials, patients treated with dupilumab in real-world clinical settings achieved clinically meaningful improvements in severity and extent of AD and severity of itch comparable to those reported in clinical trials at a similar time point

Dupilumab Treatment Provides Sustained Improvements Over 2 Years in Symptoms and Quality of Life in Adults with Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) can have a profound negative impact on the quality of life (QoL) of patients. We analyzed the long-term changes in AD symptoms, QoL, and patient assessment of treatment effect in adults with moderate-to-severe AD treated for 2 years with dupilumab. LIBERTY AD OLE (NCT01949311) is a multicenter, open-label extension (OLE) study in adults with moderate-to-severe AD who previously participated in dupilumab clinical trials (parent studies). Patients received dupilumab 300 mg weekly. Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), EQ-5D-3L, and the Patient Global Assessment of Treatment Effect (PGATE) were assessed at weeks 48 and 100. A total of 2677 patients were included in the OLE, and 1028 completed week 100. By weeks 48 and 100, 94.1% and 95.6% of patients achieved a ≥ 4-point change in POEM from the parent study baseline (PSBL), respectively, and 93.3% and 93.4% of patients had achieved a ≥ 4-point change in DLQI from PSBL, respectively. At week 100, 35.1% of patients had a POEM score ≤ 2 (AD clear/almost clear) compared with 0.1% at PSBL, and 49.9% had a DLQI score of 0 or 1 (no effect at all on patient's life) compared with 1.5% at PSBL. At week 100, 74.5-97.3% of patients reported no effect of AD on the individual EQ-5D-3L domains, and 93.8% rated the effect of dupilumab treatment as "excellent," "very good," or "good" according to PGATE. In adults with moderate-to-severe AD, dupilumab treatment over 2 years resulted in sustained improvements in patient-reported symptoms and QoL and a favorable patient perception of treatment effect. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01949311. Supplementary material 1 (MP4 552250 kb)

The Family Impact of Atopic Dermatitis in the Pediatric Population: Results from an International Cross-sectional Study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of atopic dermatitis on families of pediatric subjects. STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional, web-based survey of children/adolescents (6 months to \u3c18 years old) with AD and their parents/caregivers was conducted in 18 countries encompassing North America, Latin America, Europe, Middle East/Eurasia, and East Asia. Children/adolescents with AD and their parents/caregivers were identified by the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) criteria and ever being told by a physician that they had eczema . AD severity was assessed using Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) and Patient Global Assessment. AD impact on families\u27 lives was evaluated using the Dermatitis Family Impact questionnaire (DFI), and stand-alone questions on hours of AD-related care (past week) and missed work days (past 4 weeks) due to their child\u27s AD. RESULTS: A total of 7465 pairs of pediatric participants with AD and their parents/caregivers were surveyed. Across age groups, DFI total score for all regions ranged from 7.1-8.6, 13.2-14.9, and 17.0-17.2 for POEM mild, moderate, and severe AD, respectively; Subscale scores showed that higher AD severity had a greater impact on all family life domains, including sleep and tiredness. No specific patterns or trends were observed across age groups. Time spent on childcare and missed work days increased with AD severity. CONCLUSIONS: Across pediatric age groups and geographic regions, higher AD severity was associated with a greater negative impact on physical, emotional, social, and economic components of family life