Admixtures to d-wave gap symmetry in untwinned YBa2Cu3O7 superconducting films measured by angle-resolved electron tunneling

We report on an \textit{ab}-anisotropy of $J_{c \parallel b}/J_{c \parallel a}$ and $I_{c}R_{n \parallel b}/I_{c}R_{n \parallel a}\cong 1.2$ in ramp-edge junctions between untwinned YBa$_{2}$Cu$_{3}$O$_{7}$ and $s$% -wave Nb. For these junctions, the angle $\theta$ with the YBa$_{2}$Cu$_{3}$O$_{7}$ crystal b-axis is varied as a single parameter. The $R_{n}$A($\theta$)-dependence presents 2-fold symmetry. The minima in $I_{c}R_{n}$ at $\theta \cong 50^{\circ}$ suggest a real s-wave subdominant component and negligible $d_{xy}$-wave or imaginary s-wave admixtures. The $I_{c}R_{n}$($\theta$)-dependence is well-fitted by 83% $d_{x^{2}-y^{2}}$-, 15% isotropic $s$- and 2% anisotropic s-wave order parameter symmetry, consistent with $\Delta_{b}/\Delta_{a} \cong 1.5$.Comment: 4 pages, 3 figures, to be published in Physical Review Letter

How to assess the external validity of therapeutic trials: a conceptual approach

Background External validity of study results is an important issue from a clinical point of view. From a methodological point of view, however, the concept of external validity is more complex than it seems to be at first glance. Methods Methodological review to address the concept of external validity. Results External validity refers to the question whether results are generalizable to persons other than the population in the original study. The only formal way to establish the external validity would be to repeat the study for that specific target population. We propose a three-way approach for assessing the external validity for specified target populations. (i) The study population might not be representative for the eligibility criteria that were intended. It should be addressed whether the study population differs from the intended source population with respect to characteristics that influence outcome. (ii) The target population will, by definition, differ from the study population with respect to geographical, temporal and ethnical conditions. Pondering external validity means asking the question whether these differences may influence study results. (iii) It should be assessed whether the study's conclusions can be generalized to target populations that do not meet all the eligibility criteria. Conclusion Judging the external validity of study results cannot be done by applying given eligibility criteria to a single target population. Rather, it is a complex reflection in which prior knowledge, statistical considerations, biological plausibility and eligibility criteria all have plac

Genetic parameters and genomic regions associated with piglet response to vaccination for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus and co-infection with PRRS virus and porcine circovirus type 2b (PCV2b)

Citation: Dunkelberger, J. R., Serao, N. V. L., Kerrigan, M. A., Lunney, J. K., Rowland, R. R. R., & Dekkers, J. C. M. (2016). Genetic parameters and genomic regions associated with piglet response to vaccination for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus and co-infection with PRRS virus and porcine circovirus type 2b (PCV2b). Journal of Animal Science, 94, 52-53. doi:10.2527/msasas2016-112Objectives of this research were to estimate genetic parameters and to identify genomic regions associated with PRRS viral load (VL), PCV2b VL, and average daily gain (ADG) in nursery pigs vaccinated or non-vaccinated for PRRS virus (PRRSV), followed by co-infection with PRRSV and PCV2b. Data used included 396 commercial crossbred pigs from two PRRS Host Genetics Consortium trials, all from the same genetic supplier. Pigs were sent to Kansas State University after weaning and randomly sorted into two rooms. All pigs in one room were vaccinated for PRRS, and 28 d later, pigs in both rooms were co-infected with PRRSV and PCV2b, followed for 42 d, and genotyped using the 80K BeadChip. PRRS VL after vaccination and post co-infection and PCV2b VL were calculated as area under the curve of serum viremia from ?28 to 0, 0 to 21, and 0 to 42 d post co-infection, respectively. Genetic parameters were estimated by fitting multivariate animal models in ASReml4 with litter and pen (trial) as additional random effects. Trait-specific fixed effects of trial and weight and age at vaccination were also fitted. Genome-wide association (GWA) studies were performed by fitting SNPs as fixed effects one at a time in bivariate animal models for the non-vaccinated (Non-Vx) and vaccinated (Vx) groups for each trait. Heritability estimates following vaccination were 0.31, 0.07, and 0.10 for ADG Non-Vx, ADG Vx, and PRRS Vx, respectively. During the co-infection period, heritability estimates were slightly higher at 0.53, 0.57, 0.56, 0.20, 0.18, and 0.15 for ADG Non-Vx, ADG Vx, PRRS Non-Vx, PRRS Vx, PCV2b Non-Vx, and PCV2b Vx, respectively. Standard errors ranged from 0.14 to 0.22. A strong, positive genetic correlation (0.95 ± 1.01) was observed for PRRS VL post-vaccination with PRRS VL Non-Vx. Unique genomic regions were identified between Vx and Non-Vx pigs for each trait, the most significant of which was identified for PCV2b VL and located near the major histocompatibility complex, an important region for response to infection. The chromosome 4 region, which has been associated with VL following PRRSV-only infection, was associated with PRRS VL Non-Vx but not PRRS Vx or PRRS VL post-vaccination. Together, these results suggest that selection for improved performance under co-infection of PRRS and PCV2b is possible. Additionally, identification of unique genomic regions between Vx and Non-Vx pigs may enable selection of pigs with better response to vaccination. This research was supported by USDA-NIFA grants 2012–38420–19286 and 2013–68004–20362

Effect of immune system stimulation and divergent selection for residual feed intake on digestive capacity of the small intestine in growing pigs

Residual feed intake (RFI) is a measure of feed efficiency that reflects differences in the efficiency of the use of feed for maintenance and growth. The consequences of genetic selection for RFI on intestinal nutrient digestion capacity, particularly during immune system stimulation (ISS), are poorly documented. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of ISS and genetic selection for RFI on apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of nutrients, and intestinal nutrient transport and barrier function

Improved nutrient digestibility and retention partially explains feed efficiency gains in pigs selected for low residual feed intake

Residual feed intake (RFI) is a unique measure of feed efficiency (FE) and an alternative to traditional measures. The RFI is defined as the difference between the actual feed intake of a pig and its expected feed intake based on a given amount of growth and backfat. Therefore, selecting pigs with a low RFI (LRFI) results in a more feed-efficient animal for a given rate of growth. Our objective was to determine the extent to which apparent total tract digestibility of nutrients and energy use and retention may explain FE differences between pigs divergently selected for LRFI or high RFI (HRFI). After 7 generations of selection, 12 HRFI and 12 LRFI pigs (62 ± 3 kg BW) were randomly assigned to metabolism crates. Pigs had free access to a standard diet based on corn (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max) meal containing 0.4% TiO2, an exogenous digestibility marker. After a 7-d acclimation, total urine and feces were collected for 72 h. Nutrient and energy digestibility, P digestibility, and N balance were then measured and calculated to determine differences between the RFI lines. As expected, ADFI was lower (2.0 vs. 2.6 kg; P \u3c 0.01), ADG did not differ, and FE was higher in the LRFI (P \u3c 0.001) compared to the HRFI pigs. The digestibility values for DM (87.3 vs. 85.9%), N (88.3 vs. 86.1%), and GE (86.9 vs. 85.4%) were higher (P ≤ 0.003) in the LRFI vs. HRFI pigs, respectively. The DE (16.59 vs. 16.32 MJ/kg DM) and ME (15.98 vs. 15.72 MJ/kg DM) values were also greater (P \u3c 0.001) in LRFI pigs. When correcting for ADFI, P digestibility did not differ between the lines. However, the LRFI pigs tended to have improved N retention (P = 0.08) compared to HRFI pigs (36.9 vs. 32.1 g/d). In conclusion, the higher energy and nutrient digestibility, use, and retention may partially explain the superior FE seen in pigs selected for LRFI