Non-canonical retrotransposon insertions: alternative pathways to integration

The majority of retrotransposons, mobile elements which move around the genome using an RNA intermediate, insert into their host genomes using target-primed reverse transcription (TPRT). Two of the most well-studied types of active retrotransposons in primates are L1s (Long Interspersed Element-1) and Alu elements. Both preferentially insert using TPRT, and these insertions can create genomic rearrangements and contribute to genome fluidity. Recent analyses have shown that L1s and Alu elements can insert using a variety of non-canonical mechanisms, including a DNA double-strand break repair pathway. Increased understanding of the mechanisms by which mobile elements insert into host genomes can help us examine why they are tolerated. We surveyed non-canonical insertions using the human, chimpanzee, orangutan, rhesus, and marmoset genomes. Using both computational data mining and experimental verification, we have attempted to provide clear examples of the different mechanisms for these insertions and discuss their implications. In the first analysis, we assessed 23 non-classical Alu element insertions into primate genomes. These insertions left characteristic atypical sequence hallmarks since they did not use the typical L1 endonuclease cleavage site to insert into the host genomes. Mobile elements are largely considered disruptive to genomes, creating instability, but also generating diversity. In relatively rare cases, such as non-classical insertions, mobile elements may play a positive role in genomic stability by patching DNA double-strand breaks. Next, we examined both L1 and Alu elements in the context of internally primed insertions, resulting in characteristics similar to, but distinguishable from, classical TPRT. These twenty insertions provided support for the suggested lack of fidelity attributed to reverse transcriptase. We then characterized thirty-nine loci in our third analysis, which appear to have resulted from a variant of twin priming, itself a permutation of classical TPRT. The mechanisms by which mobile elements insert can offer insight on how mobile elements evade host defenses. Though this research is limited to primate genomes, the resulting understanding of the mechanisms at work is applicable to retrotransposons in general

RNA interference screening reveals host CaMK4 as a regulator of cryptococcal uptake and pathogenesis

ABSTRACT Cryptococcus neoformans , the causative agent of cryptococcosis, is an opportunistic fungal pathogen that kills over 200,000 individuals annually. This yeast may grow freely in body fluids, but it also flourishes within host cells. Despite extensive research on cryptococcal pathogenesis, host genes involved in the initial engulfment of fungi and subsequent stages of infection are woefully understudied. To address this issue, we combined short interfering RNA silencing and a high-throughput imaging assay to identify host regulators that specifically influence cryptococcal uptake. Of 868 phosphatase and kinase genes assayed, we discovered 79 whose silencing significantly affected cryptococcal engulfment. For 25 of these, the effects were fungus specific, as opposed to general alterations in phagocytosis. Four members of this group significantly and specifically altered cryptococcal uptake; one of them encoded CaMK4, a calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase. Pharmacological inhibition of CaMK4 recapitulated the observed defects in phagocytosis. Furthermore, mice deficient in CaMK4 showed increased survival compared to wild-type mice upon infection with C. neoformans . This increase in survival correlated with decreased expression of pattern recognition receptors on host phagocytes known to recognize C. neoformans . Altogether, we have identified a kinase that is involved in C. neoformans internalization by host cells and in host resistance to this deadly infection. </jats:p

Heads or tails: L1 insertion-associated 5' homopolymeric sequences

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>L1s are one of the most successful autonomous mobile elements in primate genomes. These elements comprise as much as 17% of primate genomes with the majority of insertions occurring via target primed reverse transcription (TPRT). Twin priming, a variant of TPRT, can result in unusual DNA sequence architecture. These insertions appear to be inverted, truncated L1s flanked by target site duplications.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We report on loci with sequence architecture consistent with variants of the twin priming mechanism and introduce dual priming, a mechanism that could generate similar sequence characteristics. These insertions take the form of truncated L1s with hallmarks of classical TPRT insertions but having a poly(T) simple repeat at the 5' end of the insertion. We identified loci using computational analyses of the human, chimpanzee, orangutan, rhesus macaque and marmoset genomes. Insertion site characteristics for all putative loci were experimentally verified.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The 39 loci that passed our computational and experimental screens probably represent inversion-deletion events which resulted in a 5' inverted poly(A) tail. Based on our observations of these loci and their local sequence properties, we conclude that they most probably represent twin priming events with unusually short non-inverted portions. We postulate that dual priming could, theoretically, produce the same patterns. The resulting homopolymeric stretches associated with these insertion events may promote genomic instability and create potential target sites for future retrotransposition events.</p

In search of polymorphic Alu insertions with restricted geographic distributions

Alu elements are transposable elements that have reached over one million copies in the human genome. Some Alu elements inserted in the genome so recently that they are still polymorphic for insertion presence or absence in human populations. Recently, there has been an increasing interest in using Alu variation for studies of human population genetic structure and inference of individual geographic origin. Currently, this requires a high number of Alu loci. Here, we used a linker-mediated polymerase chain reaction method to preferentially identify low-frequency Alu elements in various human DNA samples with different geographic origins. The candidate Alu loci were subsequently genotyped in 18 worldwide human populations (∼370 individuals), resulting in the identification of two new Alu insertions restricted to populations of African ancestry. Our results suggest that it may ultimately become possible to correctly infer the geographic affiliation of unknown samples with high levels of confidence without having to genotype as many as 100 Alu loci. This is desirable if Alu insertion polymorphisms are to be used for human evolution studies or forensic applications. © 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

Internal priming: An opportunistic pathway for L1 and Alu retrotransposition in hominins

Retrotransposons, specifically Alu and L1 elements, have been especially successful in their expansion throughout primate genomes. While most of these elements integrate through an endonuclease-mediated process termed target primed reverse transcription, a minority integrate using alternative methods. Here we present evidence for one such mechanism, which we term internal priming and demonstrate that loci integrating through this mechanism are qualitatively different from classical insertions. Previous examples of this mechanism are limited to cell culture assays, which show that reverse transcription can initiate upstream of the 3′ poly-A tail during retrotransposon integration. To detect whether this mechanism occurs in vivo as well as in cell culture, we have analyzed the human genome for internal priming events using recently integrated L1 and Alu elements. Our examination of the human genome resulted in the recovery of twenty events involving internal priming insertions, which are structurally distinct from both classical TPRT-mediated insertions and non-classical insertions. We suggest two possible mechanisms by which these internal priming loci are created and provide evidence supporting a role in staggered DNA double-strand break repair. Also, we demonstrate that the internal priming process is associated with inter-chromosomal duplications and the insertion of filler DNA. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

An alternative pathway for Alu retrotransposition suggests a role in DNA double-strand break repair

AbstractThe Alu family is a highly successful group of non-LTR retrotransposons ubiquitously found in primate genomes. Similar to the L1 retrotransposon family, Alu elements integrate primarily through an endonuclease-dependent mechanism termed target site-primed reverse transcription (TPRT). Recent studies have suggested that, in addition to TPRT, L1 elements occasionally utilize an alternative endonuclease-independent pathway for genomic integration. To determine whether an analogous mechanism exists for Alu elements, we have analyzed three publicly available primate genomes (human, chimpanzee and rhesus macaque) for endonuclease-independent recently integrated or lineage specific Alu insertions. We recovered twenty-three examples of such insertions and show that these insertions are recognizably different from classical TPRT-mediated Alu element integration. We suggest a role for this process in DNA double-strand break repair and present evidence to suggest its association with intra-chromosomal translocations, in-vitro RNA recombination (IVRR), and synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA)

Alu Recombination-Mediated Structural Deletions in the Chimpanzee Genome

With more than 1.2 million copies, Alu elements are one of the most important sources of structural variation in primate genomes. Here, we compare the chimpanzee and human genomes to determine the extent of Alu recombination-mediated deletion (ARMD) in the chimpanzee genome since the divergence of the chimpanzee and human lineages (∼6 million y ago). Combining computational data analysis and experimental verification, we have identified 663 chimpanzee lineage-specific deletions (involving a total of ∼771 kb of genomic sequence) attributable to this process. The ARMD events essentially counteract the genomic expansion caused by chimpanzee-specific Alu inserts. The RefSeq databases indicate that 13 exons in six genes, annotated as either demonstrably or putatively functional in the human genome, and 299 intronic regions have been deleted through ARMDs in the chimpanzee lineage. Therefore, our data suggest that this process may contribute to the genomic and phenotypic diversity between chimpanzees and humans. In addition, we found four independent ARMD events at orthologous loci in the gorilla or orangutan genomes. This suggests that human orthologs of loci at which ARMD events have already occurred in other nonhuman primate genomes may be “at-risk” motifs for future deletions, which may subsequently contribute to human lineage-specific genetic rearrangements and disorders