Patient and practitioner satisfaction with tele-dermatology including Australia’s indigenous population: A systematic review of the literature

AbstractBackgroundAustralia’s health disparity, combined with evolving technologies, has evoked increasing interest and funding in health services that could address inequities. One such emerging service is tele-medicine.ObjectiveThe purpose of this report is to discuss and evaluate the current literature regarding patient and practitioner satisfaction with tele-medicine, and more specifically tele-dermatology.MethodsWe searched for literature relevant to tele-dermatology use among Australia’s indigenous population. We synthesized the literature in our report and identified elements of tele-dermatology not yet researched.ResultsMost significantly, all available research is currently based on descriptive studies and there is no validated tool to assess the efficacy of tele-dermatology.LimitationsNo published research currently exists on the use of tele-dermatology among Australia’s indigenous population.ConclusionA review of the literature shows that tele-dermatology is considered a valuable service, particularly to patients living in rural areas who might not otherwise have access to specialist care

Epidemiology of epidermolysis bullosa in the antipodes: The Australasian epidermolysis bullosa registry with a focus on Herlitz junctional epidermolysis bullosa

To present epidemiologic and clinical data from the Australasian Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB) Registry, the first orphan disease registry in Australia. Design: Observational study (cross-sectional and longitudinal). Setting: Australian private dermatology practice, inpatient ward, and outpatient clinic. Patients: Systematic case finding of patients with EB simplex, junctional EB (JEB), and dystrophic EB and data collection were performed throughout Australia and New Zealand from January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2008. Patients were consecutively enrolled in the study after clinical assessment and laboratory diagnosis. Medical records were retrospectively examined, and physicians involved in EB care were contacted to obtain patient history. A Herlitz JEB case series was prepared from registry data. Main Outcome Measures: Demographics and prognosis of patients with Herlitz JEB. Results: A total of 259 patients were enrolled in the study: 139 with EBS, 91 with dystrophic EB, 28 with JEB, and 1 with Kindler syndrome. Most enrollees were Australian citizens (n=243), with an Australian prevalence rate of 10.3 cases per million. The age range in the registry was birth to 99 years, with a mean and median age of 24.1 and 18.0 years, respectively. Ages were similar in patients with EBS and dominant dystrophic EB but were markedly lower in patients with JEB. Patients with Herlitz JEB (n=10) had the highest morbidity and mortality rates, with a mean age at death of 6.8 months. Sepsis, failure to thrive, and tracheolaryngeal complications were the leading causes of death. Conclusions: The Australasian EB registry is the first registry in Australia and New Zealand to provide original data on age, sex, ethnicity, and geographical and disease subtype distribution. The Australasian Herlitz JEB cohort witnessed a high infant mortality rate and poor prognosis overall

Phase 2B randomized study of nemolizumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and severe pruritus

Background: Nemolizumab targets the IL-31 receptor a subunit involved in atopic dermatitis (AD) pathogenesis. Objective: We sought to evaluate a new dosing strategy of nemolizumab in patients with AD. Methods: We performed a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of nemolizumab (10, 30, and 90 mg) subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks versus placebo, with topical corticosteroids in adults with moderate-to-severe AD, severe pruritus, and inadequate control with topical treatment (n 5 226). The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), the peak pruritus (PP) numeric rating scale (NRS), and the Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) were assessed. Standard safety assessments were performed. Results: Nemolizumab improved EASI, IGA, and/or NRS-itch scores, with the 30-mg dose being most effective. Nemolizumab (30 mg) reduced EASI scores versus placebo at week 24 (268.8% vs 252.1%, P 5 .016); significant differences were observed by week 8 (P <_ .01). With significant improvement (P 5 .028) as early as week 4, IGA 0/1 rates were higher for 30 mg of nemolizumab versus placebo at week 16 (33.3% vs 12.3%, P 5 .008) but not week 24 because of an increased placebo/topical corticosteroid effect (36.8% vs 21.1%, P 5 .06). PP-NRS scores were improved for 30 mg of nemolizumab versus placebo at week 16 (268.6% vs 234.3%, P <.0001) and week 24 (267.3% vs 235.8%, P <.0001), with a difference by week 1 (P _4-point decrease) were greater for 30 mg of nemolizumab versus placebo at week 16 (P <_ .001) and week 24 (P <_ .01). Nemolizumab was safe and well tolerated. The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis and upper respiratory tract infection. Conclusions: Nemolizumab resulted in rapid and sustained improvements in cutaneous signs of inflammation and pruritus in patients with AD, with maximal efficacy observed at 30 mg. Nemolizumab had an acceptable safety profile. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2020;145:173-82.

Correction to: Long-term safety and efficacy of vismodegib in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma: final update of the pivotal ERIVANCE BCC study

Following publication of the original article [1], it was reported that the legend for Fig. 1 was incomplete. The complete figure legend is:https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/148648/1/12885_2019_Article_5568.pd

Perspective From the 5th International Pemphigus and Pemphigoid Foundation Scientific Conference

The 5th Scientific Conference of the International Pemphigus and Pemphigoid Foundation (IPPF), “Pemphigus and Pemphigoid: A New Era of Clinical and Translational Science” was held in Orlando, Florida, on May 15–16, 2018. Scientific sessions covered recent, ongoing, and future clinical trials in pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid, disease activity and quality of life instruments, and the IPPF Natural History Study. Furthermore, the meeting provided an opportunity to hear firsthand from patients, investigators, and industry about their experience enrolling for clinical trials