16 research outputs found

    Predictive factor for lymph node metastasis in non-metastatic colorectal adenocarcinomas

    Get PDF
    Objectives: To evaluate the predictive factors of lymph node involvement in non-metastatic colorectal adenocarcinomas (nmCRC). Methods: A total of 453 patients diagnosed with nmCRC were analyzed regarding T stage, lymphovascular invasion status, tumor grade and proposed risk score (RS), determined by the combination of these three factors for lymph node metastasis. Results: The median age was 62 (25-90 years), M/F ratio was 1.4:1 and majority of the patients had tumors localized on the left colon (70.6%). The number of excised lymph nodes was ≥12 in 77% of the cases. The postoperative pathological assessments revealed that 57.2% of patie,nts had N0 disease, 29.1% had N1 disease, and 13.7% had N2 disease. The T stages (p=0.007), grade (p<0.001), lymphovascular invasion (p=0.002), RS (p<0.001), and number of excised lymph nodes (p=0.029) were significantly different between N0, N1, and N2 patients. Higher RS was associated with lymph node metastasis (p<0.001). Conclusion: The risk score may predict lymph node metastasis in patients with nmCRC and if validated may be helpful in the decision-making of adjuvant chemotherapy, especially in the elderly and patients with inadequate lymph node dissection

    Evaluation of Death Risks of Lung Cancer Patients with Frailty Models

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study is to investigate the prognostic factors of lung cancer by evaluating the most appropriate survival model with a selection criteria. MATERIAL AND METHODS:In the study, the data of 185 patients diagnosed with lung cancer from the Medical Oncology Outpatient Clinic of Mustafa Kemal University Faculty of Medicine were retrospectively obtained from the patient files. The frailty models with different distributions were used for evaluating the heterogeneity between patients. Model selections were made according to AIC and BIC criteria. RESULTS:The median survival time of patients with lung cancer in the study was 11 months (95% confidence interval 9.57-12.42). The best frailty models’ frailty distribution was lognormal and the basic hazard function distribution was loglogistic. The best model results showed that, the effect of the albumin variable on the risk of death of lung cancer patients was statistically significant (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS:Generally, environmental and genetic factors that affect the survival time of lung cancer patients can not be evaluated.Thus, the term of the frailty resulting from the heterogeneity of factors when assessing individuals influencing survival of patients with lung cancer should be taken into account

    Sunitinib for Patients with Metastatic Non-clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Turkish Oncology Group Trial

    No full text
    Aim: This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy and toxicity of sunitinib, a targeted-agent, for non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Patients and Methods: Sixty-three patients with complete clinical data from 13 oncology Centers were retrospectively evaluated. Outcomes analyzed were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events. Results: The median age of all patients, 38 men (60.3%) and 25 women (39.7%), was 63 years (range=25-82 years). Histological subtypes included 46 (88%) cases of papillary RCC, 10 of chromophobe, and 7 unclassified cases. Median treatment duration was seven months (range=2-86 months). At the time of this analysis, 52 patients had discontinued treatment, 33 of whom had died. Treatment discontinuation was due to disease progression in 43 patients, and toxicity in nine. Dose interruption was necessary in 22 (34.9%) patients, and dose reduction in 27 (42.9%). The objective response rate and disease control rate were 11.1% and 63.5%, respectively. The median PFS and OS were 7.6 months (95% confidence interval (CI)=5.5-9.7 months) and 22.0 months (95% CI=13.4-30.6 months), respectively, with 1-year rates of 64.7% and 33.7%, respectively. Conclusion: Clinical outcome of the metastatic non-clear cell RCC patients with sunitinib treatment seemed to be worse than the historical data of clear cell RCC patients, in terms of PFS, OS and objective response. New and more effective targeted-therapies and better understanding of the underlying molecular processes are necessary to improve survival outcome for these patients
    corecore