17 research outputs found

    Een patiënte met abdominale last en anorexie

    No full text
    A 72-year-old woman was referred to the Department of Gastroenterology because of complaints of abdominal pain, anorexia and constipation. An endoscopical evaluation of the gastro-intestinal tract revealed diffuse submucosal lesions, from which biopsies were taken. Further investigations confirmed a metastasized lobular breast carcinoma. According to the literature gastrointestinal tract metastases are only rarely the first manifestation of a breast cancer. In our case it was important to differentiate with a primary gastrointestinal malignancy. The reason why the primary tumor is almost always a breast carcinoma of the lobular type, remains unknown.status: publishe

    Eosinofiele gastro-enteritis in de differentiaaldiagnostiek bij persisterende gastro-intestinale symptomen. CasuĂŻstiek en literatuuroverzicht

    No full text
    Eosinophilic gastroenteritis is uncommon. The eosinophilic granulocyte is the central actor. Activation results in degranulation of eosinophilic granules and tissue damage. An association with food allergies and atopy is presumed. The clinical presentation is variable. Persisting gastrointestinal complaints necessitate taking biopsies which ultimately reveal tissue eosinophilia as the most prominent and diagnostic characteristic. Therapy with corticoids can lead to an overt response in most cases. The importance to confirm or rule out an underlying EGE in cases of persisting gastrointestinal symptomatology is emphasized.status: publishe

    CTCs as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for stage II/III Colon Cancer: a companion study to the PePiTA trial

    No full text
    Abstract Background Adjuvant therapy improves the prognosis of stage II & III colon cancer patients. Unfortunately, most patients do not benefit from this treatment. PePITA (NCT00994864) is a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized study whose primary objective is to predict the outcome of adjuvant therapy in colon cancer. Methods The primary objective was to determine the prognostic and predictive value of circulating tumor cell (CTC) detection before therapy and after one course of preoperative FOLFOX. Results Out of the 58 first patients accrued in PePiTA trial, 36 patients participated in the CTC companion study, of whom 32 had at least one evaluable sample. Only 5 patients (14, 95% CI = 5–30%) had ≥1 CTC/22.5 ml blood in at least one of the two timepoints with 2 patients having ≥1 CTC/22.5 ml at baseline (6, 95% CI: 1–19%). The detection rate of patients with CTCs at baseline being lower than expected, the inclusion of patients in the PePiTA CTC substudy was stopped. The limited sample size did not allow us to investigate the prognostic and predictive value of CTCs in locally advanced colon cancer. Conclusions Our data illustrate the need for further standardized studies in order to find the most reliable prognostic/predictive biomarker in early-stage colon cancer. Trial registration This trial was prospectively registered at Jules Bordet institute (NCT00994864) on the October 14, 2009

    Preoperative chemosensitivity testing as predictor of treatment benefit in adjuvant stage III colon cancer : preliminary analysis of the PePiTA study

    No full text
    Background: Although being the standard-of-care for stage III colon cancer, no biomarkers can identify patients (pts) who benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. In metastatic pts, the lack of metabolic response (mR) in FDG-PET/CT after 1 chemotherapy cycle predicts the absence of treatment benefit. The PePiTA study aims to evaluate if the absence of mR after 1 cycle of pre-operative chemotherapy is predictive of recurrence in non-metastatic colon cancer pts. Herein, we report a preliminary analysis on surgical outcomes, adverse events and mR assessment after 1 cycle of pre-operative chemotherapy after completing the study accrual objective. Methods: Colon cancer pts eligible for curative resection and ECOG ≤1 received 1 cycle of mFOLFOX followed by surgery in this prospective, multicentre, non-randomized trial. FDG-PET/CT was performed at baseline and after 1 cycle of mFOLFOX. Adjuvant mFOLFOX was administered for up to 12 cycles for stage III pts, whereas for stage II pts the decision to pursue adjuvant chemotherapy was at investigator’s discretion. A decrease ≥15% in SUVmax after 1 cycle of chemotherapy was defined as mR (EORTC criteria) at central review. Results: mR was assessable on the primary tumor in 204/240 pts (85%). In 11 pts (4.6%), staging was modified by the baseline FDG-PET/CT, which detected metastatic disease or other tumors. Pre-operative mFOLFOX was administered to 218 pts, of which 14 (6%) had a grade ≥3 adverse event. Surgery was performed in 218 pts, with a median delay of 20 days (6 to 59) after chemotherapy. Surgical complications occurred in 28 (13%) pts, however no deaths occurred. The median SUVmax decrease between baseline and 2nd FDG-PET/CT was 24%. A mR was observed in 65.2% of the pts, whereas 34.8% showed no mR, including 3% who had progressive disease. Conclusions: One cycle of pre-operative mFOLFOX followed by a mR assessment has shown to be a feasible and safe strategy, raising interest on the potential of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer. The early mR assessment identified pts that may not benefit from chemotherapy and might have a worse prognosis. The substantiation of this hypothesis is expected with the study’s long-term results

    Preoperative (preop) chemosensitivity Testing as predictor of treatment benefit in adjuvant stade III colon cancer (CC) : Interim analysis of the PEPITA study

    No full text
    385 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) improves stage III CC outcome but is not effective for all patients (pts). PePiTA’s main hypothesis is that absence of metabolic response (MR) of the primary tumor after 1 preop CT course predicts absence of benefit from adjuvant CT (at 3-year DFS). This strategy's aim is to spare pts from useless toxicities, improve healthcare resource allocation, and guide translational research. This interim analysis was performed for safety and feasibility of MR assessment (MRA). Methods: Pts ≥ 18 years, with PS ≤ 1, diagnosed with CC considered for curative resection are eligible, after signed consent. Baseline PET is repeated after 1 CT cycle, followed by surgery. PET quality insurance and MRA are performed centrally and the result is blinded for investigators. Results: From 2010 to 2013, 114 pts—M/F (55%/45%), median age 66 (26-81), ECOG 0/1(92%/8%)—were included in 15 Belgian centers. 11 pts were excluded from analysis: 2 hyperglycemia at baseline PET; 2 withdrew consent; 6 PET-revealed stage IV CC; and 1 second cancer. Preop CT was associated with 5% grade (gr) 3-4 neutropenia, 1% gr 3 diarrhea, 1% gr 3 hypokaliemia, 1% peritonitis and 1% gr 3 thromboembolic events. Colectomies were performed in all pts after a median of 20 days (interquartile interval 18-21): 32 right (31%), 69 left (67%), and 2 procedures not detailed. Pathology showed stages 0 (1%), I (13%), II (34%), III (47%), IV (7%), without lymph node downstaging. Postoperative morbidity is 9% (95%CI 5-16%) and includes fistulas (4%), transient ischemic attack (1%), ileus (2%), and evisceration (1%), but no death. Technical or methodological reasons prevented MRA in 19/103 pts. Median SUVmax was 14.4 (4.9-47.8) at baseline, and 10.9 (0-39.3) on day 14. 2 pts presented with complete MR. For the others, median delta SUVmax was -22% (-60 to +31%). MR was observed in 60% of pts, and was absent in 40%, with equal distribution for stages II and III (p = 1.00). Conclusions: 1 course of CT is feasible before curative surgery for CC, without inducing excessive toxicity, delay or surgical morbidity. MRA indicated metabolic signs of chemoresistance in 40% of the primary tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT00994864. </jats:p

    Circulating DNA in the neoadjuvant setting of early stage colon cancer.

    No full text
    While circulating tumour (ct)DNA is an indicator of minimal residual disease and negative prognostic factor in stage II-III colon cancer, no study has ever analysed the value of this biomarker in colon cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We sought to fill this gap by using prospectively collected plasma samples from 80 stage III colon cancer patients, receiving one cycle of neoadjuvant FOLFOX followed by surgery +/- adjuvant FOLFOX in the PePiTA trial. Samples were collected at baseline, 2 weeks and surgery. NPY and WIF1 were selected as universal methylation markers for ctDNA, and analysed with ddPCR technology. ROC curves were applied for cut-off points, and outcome measures included 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 6-year overall survival (OS). After a median follow-up of 52.5 months, baseline circulating-free (cf) DNA was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR 3.35, 95% CI: 1.15-9.77,  = .03), and a trend towards a similar association was observed for relative cfDNA changes between baseline and surgery (HR 2.57, 95% CI: 0.94-7.05,  = .07). Among 60 ctDNA assessable patients, 25 (42%) had detectable ctDNA at baseline. While detection of ctDNA at any pre-operative timepoint was not associated with outcome, patients with ctDNA increase (change of the worst trending methylation marker ≥11%, or mean ctDNA change of NPY and WIF1 ≥ 0%) between baseline and surgery showed a trend towards worse 5-year DFS (HR 3.66, 95% CI: 0.81-16.44,  = .09). This is the first study of ctDNA in the neoadjuvant setting of early-stage colon cancer. Results are hypothesis-generating and should be confirmed in larger series
    corecore