Risk Factors for Heart Failure Among Pan-European Childhood Cancer Survivors: A PanCareSurFup and ProCardio Cohort and Nested Case-Control Study.

PURPOSE Heart failure (HF) is a potentially life-threatening complication of treatment for childhood cancer. We evaluated the risk and risk factors for HF in a large European study of long-term survivors. Little is known of the effects of low doses of treatment, which is needed to improve current treatment protocols and surveillance guidelines. METHODS This study includes the PanCareSurFup and ProCardio cohort of ≥ 5-year childhood cancer survivors diagnosed between 1940 and 2009 in seven European countries (N = 42,361). We calculated the cumulative incidence of HF and conducted a nested case-control study to evaluate detailed treatment-related risk factors. RESULTS The cumulative incidence of HF was 2% (95% CI, 1.7 to 2.2) by age 50 years. The case-control study (n = 1,000) showed that survivors who received a mean heart radiation therapy (RT) dose of 5 to < 15 Gy have an increased risk of HF (odds ratio, 5.5; 95% CI, 2.5 to 12.3), when compared with no heart RT. The risk associated with doses 5 to < 15 Gy increased with exposure of a larger heart volume. In addition, the HF risk increased in a linear fashion with higher mean heart RT doses. Regarding total cumulative anthracycline dose, survivors who received ≥ 100 mg/m2 had a substantially increased risk of HF and survivors treated with a lower dose showed no significantly increased risk of HF. The dose-response relationship appeared quadratic with higher anthracycline doses. CONCLUSION Survivors who received a mean heart RT dose of ≥ 5 Gy have an increased risk of HF. The risk associated with RT increases with larger volumes exposed. Survivors treated with < 100 mg/m2 total cumulative anthracycline dose have no significantly increased risk of HF. These new findings might have consequences for new treatment protocols for children with cancer and for cardiomyopathy surveillance guidelines

Risk Factors for Small Adult Height in Childhood Cancer Survivors

International audiencePURPOSE Between 10% and 20% of childhood cancer survivors (CCS) experience impaired growth, leading to small adult height (SAH). Our study aimed to quantify risk factors for SAH or growth hormone deficiency among CCS. METHODS The French CCS Study holds data on 7,670 cancer survivors treated before 2001. We analyzed self-administered questionnaire data from 2,965 CCS with clinical, chemo/radiotherapy data from medical records. SAH was defined as an adult height ≤ 2 standard deviation scores of control values obtained from a French population health study. RESULTS After exclusion of 189 CCS treated with growth hormone, 9.2% (254 of 2,776) had a SAH. Being young at the time of cancer treatment (relative risk [RR], 0.91 [95% CI, 0.88 to 0.95] by year of age), small height at diagnosis (≤ 2 standard deviation scores; RR, 6.74 [95% CI, 4.61 to 9.86]), pituitary irradiation (5-20 Gy: RR, 4.24 [95% CI, 1.98 to 9.06]; 20-40 Gy: RR, 10.16 [95% CI, 5.18 to 19.94]; and ≥ 40 Gy: RR, 19.48 [95% CI, 8.73 to 43.48]), having received busulfan (RR, 4.53 [95% CI, 2.10 to 9.77]), or > 300 mg/m 2 of lomustine (300-600 mg/m 2 : RR, 4.21 [95% CI, 1.61 to 11.01] and ≥ 600 mg/m 2 : RR, 9.12 [95% CI, 2.75 to 30.24]) were all independent risk factors for SAH. Irradiation of ≥ 7 vertebrae (≥ 15 Gy on ≥ 90% of their volume) without pituitary irradiation increased the RR of SAH by 4.62 (95% CI, 2.77 to 7.72). If patients had also received pituitary irradiation, this increased the RR by an additional factor of 1.3 to 2.4. CONCLUSION CCS are at a high risk of SAH. CCS treated with radiotherapy, busulfan, or lomustine should be closely monitored for growth, puberty onset, and potential pituitary deficiency

Risk of digestive cancers in a cohort of 69 460 five-year survivors of childhood cancer in Europe: the PanCareSurFup study.

BACKGROUND Survivors of childhood cancer are at risk of subsequent primary neoplasms (SPNs), but the risk of developing specific digestive SPNs beyond age 40 years remains uncertain. We investigated risks of specific digestive SPNs within the largest available cohort worldwide. METHODS The PanCareSurFup cohort includes 69 460 five-year survivors of childhood cancer from 12 countries in Europe. Risks of digestive SPNs were quantified using standardised incidence ratios (SIRs), absolute excess risks and cumulative incidence. RESULTS 427 digestive SPNs (214 colorectal, 62 liver, 48 stomach, 44 pancreas, 59 other) were diagnosed in 413 survivors. Wilms tumour (WT) and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors were at greatest risk (SIR 12.1; 95% CI 9.6 to 15.1; SIR 7.3; 95% CI 5.9 to 9.0, respectively). The cumulative incidence increased the most steeply with increasing age for WT survivors, reaching 7.4% by age 55% and 9.6% by age 60 years (1.0% expected based on general population rates). Regarding colorectal SPNs, WT and HL survivors were at greatest risk; both seven times that expected. By age 55 years, 2.3% of both WT (95% CI 1.4 to 3.9) and HL (95% CI 1.6 to 3.2) survivors had developed a colorectal SPN-comparable to the risk among members of the general population with at least two first-degree relatives affected. CONCLUSIONS Colonoscopy surveillance before age 55 is recommended in many European countries for individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer, but not for WT and HL survivors despite a comparable risk profile. Clinically, serious consideration should be given to the implementation of colonoscopy surveillance while further evaluation of its benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness in WT and HL survivors is undertaken

Risk Factors for Heart Failure Among Pan-European Childhood Cancer Survivors: A PanCareSurFup and ProCardio Cohort and Nested Case-Control Study

International audiencePURPOSE Heart failure (HF) is a potentially life-threatening complication of treatment for childhood cancer. We evaluated the risk and risk factors for HF in a large European study of long-term survivors. Little is known of the effects of low doses of treatment, which is needed to improve current treatment protocols and surveillance guidelines. METHODS This study includes the PanCareSurFup and ProCardio cohort of $5-year childhood cancer survivors diagnosed between 1940 and 2009 in seven European countries (N 5 42,361). We calculated the cumulative incidence of HF and conducted a nested case-control study to evaluate detailed treatment-related risk factors. RESULTS The cumulative incidence of HF was 2$ 100 mg/m 2 had a substantially increased risk of HF and survivors treated with a lower dose showed no significantly increased risk of HF. The dose-response relationship appeared quadratic with higher anthracycline doses. CONCLUSION Survivors who received a mean heart RT dose of $ 5 Gy have an increased risk of HF. The risk associated with RT increases with larger volumes exposed. Survivors treated with , 100 mg/m 2 total cumulative anthracycline dose have no significantly increased risk of HF. These new findings might have consequences for new treatment protocols for children with cancer and for cardiomyopathy surveillance guidelines

Radiation doses received by major organs at risk in children and young adolescents treated for cancer with external beam radiation therapy:a large-scale study from 12 European countries

Background:Childhood cancer survivors are at high risk of long-term iatrogenic events, in particular those treated with radiotherapy. The prediction of risk of such events is mainly based on the knowledge of the radiation dose received to healthy organs and tissues during treatment of childhood cancer diagnosed decades ago. Purpose: We aimed to set up a standardised organ dose table in order to help former patients and clinician in charge of long term follow-up clinics. Material and methods: We performed whole body dosimetric reconstruction for 2646 patients from 12 European Countries treated between 1941 and 2006 (median: 1976). Most planning were 2D or 3D, 46% of patients were treated using Cobalt 60 and 41% using linear accelerator, the median prescribed dose being 27.2 Gy (IQ1-IQ3: 17.6-40.0 Gy), A patient specific voxel-based anthropomorphic phantom with more than 200 anatomical structures or sub-structures delineated as a surrogate of each subject's anatomy was used. The radiation therapy was simulated with a treatment planning system (TPS) based on available treatment information. The radiation dose received by any organ of the body was estimated by extending the TPS dose calculation to the whole-body, by type and localisation of childhood cancer. Results: The integral dose and normal-tissue doses to most of the 23 considered organs increased between the 1950’s and the 1970’s and decreased or plateaued thereafter. Whatever the organ considered, the type of childhood cancer explained most of the variability in organ dose. The country of treatment explained only a small part of the variability. Conclusion: The detailed dose estimates provide very useful information for former patients or clinicians who have only limited knowledge about radiation therapy protocols or techniques, but who know the type and site of childhood cancer, gender, age and year of treatment. This will allow better prediction of the long-term risk of iatrogenic events and better referral to long-term follow-up clinics

Risk Factors for Primary Bone Cancer after Childhood Cancer: A PanCare Childhood and Adolescent Cancer Survivor Care and Follow-Up Studies Nested Case-Control Study

International audiencePURPOSERadiation to the bone and exposure to alkylating agents increases the risk of bone cancer among survivors of childhood cancer, but there is uncertainty regarding the risks of bone tissue radiation doses below 10 Gy and the dose-response relationship for specific types of chemotherapy.METHODSTwelve European countries contributed 228 cases and 228 matched controls to a nested case-control study within a cohort of 69,460 5-year survivors of childhood cancer. Odds ratios (ORs) of developing bone cancer for different levels of cumulative radiation exposure and cumulative doses of specific types of chemotherapy were calculated. Excess ORs were calculated to investigate the shape and extent of any dose-response relationship.RESULTSThe OR associated with bone tissue exposed to 1-4 Gy was 4.8-fold (95% CI, 1.2 to 19.6) and to 5-9 Gy was 9.6-fold (95% CI, 2.4 to 37.4) compared with unexposed bone tissue. The OR increased linearly with increasing dose of radiation (Ptrend <.001) up to 78-fold (95% CI, 9.2 to 669.9) for doses of ≥40 Gy. For cumulative alkylating agent doses of 10,000-19,999 and ≥20,000 mg/m2, the radiation-adjusted ORs were 7.1 (95% CI, 2.2 to 22.8) and 8.3 (95% CI, 2.8 to 24.4), respectively, with independent contributions from each of procarbazine, ifosfamide, and cyclophosphamide. Other cytotoxics were not associated with bone cancer.CONCLUSIONTo our knowledge, we demonstrate - for the first time - that the risk of bone cancer is increased 5- to 10-fold after exposure of bone tissue to cumulative radiation doses of 1-9 Gy. Alkylating agents exceeding 10,000 mg/m2 increase the risk 7- to 8-fold, particularly following procarbazine, ifosfamide, and cyclophosphamide. These substantially elevated risks should be used to develop/update clinical follow-up guidelines and survivorship care plans