15 research outputs found

    Where People Meet the Muck: An Integrated Assessment of Beach Muck and Public Perception at the Bay City State Recreation Area, Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron

    Get PDF
    In several regions of the Great Lakes, including Saginaw Bay, the proliferation of muck, decaying organics largely from aquatic plants such as Cladophora, has washed ashore, and is blamed for negatively affecting water quality and economic losses in the region. The current view is that excess nutrient loading into the system is a leading cause of this type of organic debris, though changes in food web dynamics may also be a contributing factor. Through an Integrated Assessment (IA) framework, we summarized the current state of knowledge on the causes and consequences of muck conditions at the Bay City State Recreation Area (BCSRA), including the socio-economic impacts of muck at the park and on the Saginaw Bay Region. Through this framework we identify potential management scenarios for addressing beach fouling at the BCSRA. Through a robust stakeholder engagement process, the IA team implemented a suite of models and surveys to understand public perception of muck-related issues and identified a series of feasible short and long-term management actions that could help alleviate and better manage the impacts of muck. Results indicate that even drastic reductions in external phosphorus loads will not eliminate Cladophora growth in the bay. Beach muck is likely a historical part of the system, and nutrient reduction programs may not prevent muck from fouling Saginaw Bay beaches. We identify a sustainable park management practice maybe reallocating resources previously designated for cleaning efforts to achieve bare, sandy beaches and promoting alternative ecological activities and attractions such as bird watching, kayaking, and nature walks in the park’s coastal marshes

    Seasonal and interannual effects of hypoxia on fish habitat quality in central Lake Erie

    Get PDF
    1. Hypoxia occurs seasonally in many stratified coastal marine and freshwater ecosystems when bottom dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations are depleted below 2–3 mg O2 L-1. 2. We evaluated the effects of hypoxia on fish habitat quality in the central basin of Lake Erie from 1987 to 2005, using bioenergetic growth rate potential (GRP) as a proxy for habitat quality. We compared the effect of hypoxia on habitat quality of (i) rainbow smelt, Osmerus mordax mordax Mitchill (young-of-year, YOY, and adult), a cold-water planktivore, (ii) emerald shiner, Notropis atherinoides Rafinesque (adult), a warm-water planktivore, (iii) yellow perch, Perca flavescens Mitchill (YOY and adult), a cool-water benthopelagic omnivore and (iv) round goby Neogobius melanostomus Pallas (adult) a eurythermal benthivore. Annual thermal and DO profiles were generated from 1D thermal and DO hydrodynamics models developed for Lake Erie’s central basin. 3. Hypoxia occurred annually, typically from mid-July to mid-October, which spatially and temporally overlaps with otherwise high benthic habitat quality. Hypoxia reduced the habitat quality across fish species and life stages, but the magnitude of the reduction varied both among and within species because of the differences in tolerance to low DO levels and warm-water temperatures. 4. Across years, trends in habitat quality mirrored trends in phosphorus concentration and water column oxygen demand in central Lake Erie. The per cent reduction in habitat quality owing to hypoxia was greatest for adult rainbow smelt and round goby (mean: -35%), followed by adult emerald shiner (mean: -12%), YOY rainbow smelt (mean: -10%) and YOY and adult yellow perch (mean: -8.5%). 5. Our results highlight the importance of differential spatiotemporally interactive effects of DO and temperature on relative fish habitat quality and quantity. These effects have the potential to influence the performance of individual fish species as well as population dynamics, trophic interactions and fish community structure

    Multiple models guide strategies for agricultural nutrient reductions

    Full text link
    Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136504/1/fee1472_am.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136504/2/fee1472-sup-0008-WebTable7.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136504/3/fee1472-sup-0004-WebTable3.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136504/4/fee1472.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136504/5/fee1472-sup-0006-WebTable5.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136504/6/fee1472-sup-0002-WebTable1.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136504/7/fee1472-sup-0005-WebTable4.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136504/8/fee1472-sup-0007-WebTable6.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136504/9/fee1472-sup-0003-WebTable2.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136504/10/fee1472-sup-0001-WebFig1.pd
    corecore