27 research outputs found

    Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes mellitus is the leading cause of kidney failure worldwide, but few effective long-term treatments are available. In cardiovascular trials of inhibitors of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2), exploratory results have suggested that such drugs may improve renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS In this double-blind, randomized trial, we assigned patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuric chronic kidney disease to receive canagliflozin, an oral SGLT2 inhibitor, at a dose of 100 mg daily or placebo. All the patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 30 to <90 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area and albuminuria (ratio of albumin [mg] to creatinine [g], >300 to 5000) and were treated with renin–angiotensin system blockade. The primary outcome was a composite of end-stage kidney disease (dialysis, transplantation, or a sustained estimated GFR of <15 ml per minute per 1.73 m2), a doubling of the serum creatinine level, or death from renal or cardiovascular causes. Prespecified secondary outcomes were tested hierarchically. RESULTS The trial was stopped early after a planned interim analysis on the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring committee. At that time, 4401 patients had undergone randomization, with a median follow-up of 2.62 years. The relative risk of the primary outcome was 30% lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group, with event rates of 43.2 and 61.2 per 1000 patient-years, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.82; P=0.00001). The relative risk of the renal-specific composite of end-stage kidney disease, a doubling of the creatinine level, or death from renal causes was lower by 34% (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.81; P<0.001), and the relative risk of end-stage kidney disease was lower by 32% (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.86; P=0.002). The canagliflozin group also had a lower risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.95; P=0.01) and hospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.80; P<0.001). There were no significant differences in rates of amputation or fracture. CONCLUSIONS In patients with type 2 diabetes and kidney disease, the risk of kidney failure and cardiovascular events was lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group at a median follow-up of 2.62 years

    Effectiveness of Haemodiafiltration with Heat Sterilized High-Flux Polyphenylene HF Dialyzer in Reducing Free Light Chains in Patients with Myeloma Cast Nephropathy

    No full text
    <div><p>Introduction</p><p>In cases of myeloma cast nephropathy in need of haemodialysis (HD), reduction of free light chains using HD with High-Cut-Off filters (HCO-HD), in combination with chemotherapy, may be associated with better renal recovery. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of haemodiafiltration (HDF) in reducing free light chain levels using a less expensive heat sterilized high-flux polyphenylene HF dialyzer (HF-HDF).</p><p>Methods</p><p>In a single-centre prospective cohort study, 327 dialysis sessions were performed using a 2.2 m<sup>2</sup> heat sterilized high-flux polyphenylene HF dialyzer (Phylther HF22SD), a small (1.1m<sup>2</sup>) or large (2.1 m<sup>2</sup>) high-cut-off (HCO) dialyzer (HCO<sub>S</sub> and HCO<sub>L</sub>) in a cohort of 16 patients presenting with dialysis-dependent acute cast nephropathy and elevated free light chains (10 kappa, 6 lambda). The outcomes of the study were the mean reduction ratio (RR) of kappa and lambda, the proportion of treatments with an RR of at least 0.65, albumin loss and the description of patient outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using linear and logistic regression through generalized estimating equation analysis so as to take into account repeated observation within subjects and adjust for session duration.</p><p>Results</p><p>There were no significant differences in the estimated marginal mean of kappa RR, which were respectively 0.67, 0.69 and 0.70 with HCO<sub>L</sub>-HD, HCO<sub>S</sub>-HDF and HF-HDF (P = 0.950). The estimated marginal mean of the proportions of treatments with a kappa RR ≄0.65 were 68%, 63% and 71% with HCO<sub>L</sub>-HD, HCO<sub>S</sub>-HDF and HF-HDF, respectively (P = 0.913). The estimated marginal mean of lambda RR were higher with HCO<sub>L</sub>-HDF (0.78), compared to HCO<sub>L</sub>-HD and HF-HDF (0.62, and 0.61 respectively). The estimated marginal mean proportion of treatments with a lambda RR ≄0.65 were higher with HCO<sub>L</sub>-HDF (81%), compared to 57% in HF-HDF (P = 0.042). The median albumin loss were 7, 21 and 63 g/session with HF-HDF, HCO<sub>L</sub>-HD and HCO<sub>L</sub>-HDF respectively (P = 0.044). Among survivors, 9 out of 10 episodes of acute kidney injuries became dialysis-independent following a median time of renal replacement therapy of 40 days (range 7–181).</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>Therefore, in patients with acute dialysis-dependent myeloma cast nephropathy, in addition to chemotherapy, HDF with a heat sterilized high-flux polyphenylene HF dialyzer could offer an alternative to HCO dialysis for extracorporeal kappa reduction with lower albumin loss.</p></div

    Impact of haemodiafiltration method of free light chain reduction ratio.

    No full text
    <p>The impact of haemodiafiltration (HDF) in predilution (Pre), low-efficiency post-dilution (<15L post), and high-efficiency post-dilution (>15L post) are performed using large (2.1 m<sup>2</sup>) high cut-off filters (HCO<sub>L</sub>), small (1.1 m<sup>2</sup>) high cut-off filters (HCO<sub>S</sub>), and the 2.2 m<sup>2</sup> heat sterilized high-flux polyphenylene HF (HF). The estimated marginal means of kappa (A) and lambda (B) light chain reduction ratio taking into account repeated measures and duration of each treatment session. P-values reported are adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni correction method.* indicates that values are statistically different from other groups (P<0.01), ** indicates that values are statistically not different compared to other groups.</p

    Clinical and biochemical characteristics.

    No full text
    <p>CN: Myeloma Cast Nephropathy;LCDD: Light Chain Deposition Disease; MM: Multiple Myeloma; AKI: acute kidney injury. Values are mean ±SD or median (range)</p><p>* 1 subject had two distinct episodes of AKI</p><p>One patient received bortezomid- and Revlimid-based regimen. Another patient with two episodes of AKI received Bortezomib and Revlimid respectively for the first and second episode.</p><p>Clinical and biochemical characteristics.</p

    Reduction ratio of molecules of increasing molecular weights.

    No full text
    <p>The figure shows the reduction ratio (RR) of creatinine (113 Da), ÎČ-2 microglobulin (ÎČ2M, 11.8kDa), kappa (22.5 kDa) and lambda (45 kDa) free light chains, using haemodiafiltration with heat sterilized high-flux polyphenylene HF (HF-HDF), compared to haemodialysis or haemodiafiltration with a large (2.1 m<sup>2</sup>) high-cut-off dialyzer (HCO<sub>L</sub>). Estimates are obtained by generalized estimating equation taking into account repeated measures and session duration. * indicates a P-value of <0.05.</p

    Kappa free light chain reduction ratio per patient and treatment protocol.

    No full text
    <p>Values are mean±SD</p><p>RRT: Renal replacement therapy;HF-HDF: Haemodiafiltration with heat sterilized Polyphenylene HF of 2.2 m<sup>2</sup>; HCOs-HDF: Haemodiafiltration with high cut-off small surface area membrane (1.1 m<sup>2</sup>); HCO<sub>L</sub>-HD: Hemodialysis with high cut-off large surface area membrane (2.1 m<sup>2</sup>).</p><p>Kappa free light chain reduction ratio per patient and treatment protocol.</p

    Dialyzers characteristics and performance.

    No full text
    <p>*Heat sterilized</p><p>PAES: polyarylethersulfone; PVP: polyvinylpyrrolidone.</p><p>Dialyzers characteristics and performance.</p

    Lambda free light chain reduction ratio per patient and treatment protocol.

    No full text
    <p>Values are mean±SD</p><p>RRT: Renal replacement therapy;HF-HDF: Haemodiafiltration with heat sterilized Polyphenylene HF of 2.2 m<sup>2</sup>; HCO<sub>L</sub>-HDF: Haemodiafiltration with high cut-off large surface area membrane (2.1 m<sup>2</sup>); HCO<sub>L</sub>-HD: Hemodialysis with high cut-off large surface area membrane (2.1 m<sup>2</sup>).</p><p>Lambda free light chain reduction ratio per patient and treatment protocol.</p
    corecore